I agree with you, but it really happend, and in high frequency, maybe it's
a bug?
It's a unary RPC.
在 2017年9月6日星期三 UTC+8上午12:26:14，Mark D. Roth写道：
>
> If the tag being returned from the completion queue is the result of a
> Finish() call, then I think ok should always be true, even if the status
When multiple clients concurrently make the same call to a GRPC server, does
the server answere these calls asynchronously? I'm using C#. In case I want the
server to handle the calls synchronously should I use some sort of locking like
SemaphoreSlim?
Additionally, I've read that creating a con
On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 6:32 AM, Amit Saha wrote:
> Digging up this thread.
>
This thread was just shy of a year old. It would have been better to start
another thread and just reference this one with a link.
I guess you are suggesting, that a "client" program (which may be composed
> of multipl
grpc-gateway should work. Let us know how well zulu works with grpc-gateway
+ grpc.
On Sunday, September 3, 2017 at 11:23:58 PM UTC-7, Joseph Kei wrote:
>
> I want to do A/B testing on my product environment. I try to use zuul but
> it only surpport REST.
> If I still stick on using zuul, is g
Thank you all for advise and suggestions!
On Wednesday, September 6, 2017 at 3:15:34 AM UTC+3, Eric Anderson wrote:
>
> We normally recommend using a proxy that supports HTTP/2 to the backend,
> like nghttpx and derivatives (Enjoy, Istio). If that's not possible, then
> the solutions tend to inv
On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 1:07 PM, wrote:
> Is there a means for the client to obtain the certificate bytes from the
> TLS negotiation that was sent by the server ? The reason I ask, to avoid a
> replay security scenario the idea is for the client to hash this and send
> it back with requests.
>
T
We normally recommend using a proxy that supports HTTP/2 to the backend,
like nghttpx and derivatives (Enjoy, Istio). If that's not possible, then
the solutions tend to involve something that looks like grpc-web.
If the proxy you are already using supports HTTP/1.1 trailers, it should be
possible
Hi
Is there a means for the client to obtain the certificate bytes from the
TLS negotiation that was sent by the server ? The reason I ask, to avoid a
replay security scenario the idea is for the client to hash this and send
it back with requests. I honestly don't know the details of this but j
On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 6:07 AM, Amit Saha wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 9:02 AM Amit Saha wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 5 Sep 2017 at 6:44 am, Ken Payson wrote:
>>
>>> gRPC Python sets the SO_REUSEADDR option on server sockets, which allows
>>> multiple servers to bind to the same port.
>>>
>>
>> T
If the tag being returned from the completion queue is the result of a
Finish() call, then I think ok should always be true, even if the status is
not okay. This is because the underlying op in C-core always succeeds:
https://github.com/grpc/grpc/blob/master/include/grpc/impl/codegen/grpc_types.h
I think this is exactly what Service Configs are supposed to solve, but I
haven't investigate them at
all: https://github.com/grpc/grpc/blob/master/doc/service_config.md
Hope that helps,
Evan
On Saturday, September 2, 2017 at 4:24:20 AM UTC-4, Amit Saha wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I can set call s
I've got a process that is running GRPC servers on a single device via
localhost in Golang. This gives me protection from external access, but I
would like to restrict down local access as well. I would not want another
user on the same device getting access.
I could switch over to using do
This was enormously helpful.
Thank you so much for your response!
Regards,
Akshitha
On Thursday, August 31, 2017 at 7:40:50 PM UTC-4, Sree Kuchibhotla wrote:
>
> Hi Akshita,
> Just taking a step back, If you need some way to monitor multiple
> channels, one pattern that you can use is to just c
On Saturday, September 17, 2016 at 2:25:54 PM UTC+10, Eric Anderson wrote:
>
> Reading another thread made me want to tweak my statement:
>>
>> Only in very heavy throughput (when we start talking about trying to
>> fully saturate a server NIC) should you even begin to consider do something
>>
On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 9:02 AM Amit Saha wrote:
> On Tue, 5 Sep 2017 at 6:44 am, Ken Payson wrote:
>
>> gRPC Python sets the SO_REUSEADDR option on server sockets, which allows
>> multiple servers to bind to the same port.
>>
>
> Thanks. Is there any reason why this is set to be the default beha
15 matches
Mail list logo
