Re: pxe failing on grub 2.00 for files larger than 50KiB

On 26.09.2012 05:25, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > On 09/25/2012 03:09 PM, Seth Goldberg wrote: >> Is it possible that debian mismerged some changes from 2.00? > > no, i don't think so. the tarball that debian's 2.00-5 package i used > has this sha1 sum: > > 274d91e96b56a5b9dd0a07accff69dbb6d

Re: Bug#688799: grub-common: grub-mknetdir does not need to be run by root -- move out of sbin?

On 26.09.2012 00:06, Colin Watson wrote: > On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 11:04:31PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote: >> It's a reasonable argument, yes. If we do this, I think it should be >> upstream, as in the following patch. What do folks on grub-devel think? > > Oops, forgotten ChangeLog entry: > > 2

Re: [2.00] grub-install use on UEFI system?

On 25.09.2012 20:42, yannubu...@gmail.com wrote: > > > 2012/9/25 Chris Murphy > > > > On Sep 25, 2012, at 6:17 AM, yannubu...@gmail.com > wrote: >> >> With 1.99, i only had to use 'grub-install' (without any >> para

Re: pxe failing on grub 2.00 for files larger than 50KiB

On 09/25/2012 03:09 PM, Seth Goldberg wrote: > Is it possible that debian mismerged some changes from 2.00? no, i don't think so. the tarball that debian's 2.00-5 package i used has this sha1 sum: 274d91e96b56a5b9dd0a07accff69dbb6dfb596b ../grub2_2.00.orig.tar.xz which is the same as the up

Re: Bug#688799: grub-common: grub-mknetdir does not need to be run by root -- move out of sbin?

On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 11:04:31PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote: > It's a reasonable argument, yes. If we do this, I think it should be > upstream, as in the following patch. What do folks on grub-devel think? Oops, forgotten ChangeLog entry: 2012-09-25 Colin Watson * Makefile.util.def

Re: Bug#688799: grub-common: grub-mknetdir does not need to be run by root -- move out of sbin?

On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 02:06:46PM -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > I observe that grub-mknetdir works fine as a non-privileged user. > Making it an "administrator-only" tool by placing it in /usr/sbin/ > seems like it encourages people to update their tftp server > directories as root, when the

Re: pxe failing on grub 2.00 for files larger than 50KiB

On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 12:09:16PM -0700, Seth Goldberg wrote: > Is it possible that debian mismerged some changes from 2.00? It would have been extremely hard to do that by mistake, and I'm quite confident that I didn't. All our patches are done by explicit *.patch files in the debian/patches/

Re: [PATCH] suppress error message "/grub2/locale/en.mo.gz not found"

On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 12:46:15PM +0800, Michael Chang wrote: > I agree with you. IMHO the problem is it's not emitted directly from > gettext module but from common underlying fs level, removing it would > lead to other message which is fatal be ignored as well. That's incorrect; the gettext mod

Re: [PATCH] suppress error message "/grub2/locale/en.mo.gz not found"

On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 02:51:49PM +0800, Michael Chang wrote: > We don't insert gettext module if message catalog file missing to > prevent error message from being logged. I already posted a patch against the gettext module itself with a similar rationale, which I think is a better place for thi

Re: pxe failing on grub 2.00 for files larger than 50KiB

Hi, Is it possible that debian mismerged some changes from 2.00? There is code in tftp.c that stalls TFTP responses if >= 50 packets are queued by the network driver. That packet count is increased by one each time grub_net_put_packet is called and decreased by one each time grub_net_recei

pxe failing on grub 2.00 for files larger than 50KiB

hi grub folks-- i'm using grub 2.00-5 from debian experimental. I made a pxeboot netdir with grub-mknetdir. i'm trying to boot from it, and i get: error: timeout reading '/boot/grub/i386-pc/normal.mod'. From the command prompt, i can successfully load smaller modules like cat.mod and hello

Re: [PATCH] suppress error message "/grub2/locale/en.mo.gz not found"

В Вт., 25/09/2012 в 19:24 +0400, Andrey Borzenkov пишет: > В Вт., 25/09/2012 в 12:46 +0800, Michael Chang пишет: > > 2012/9/25 Andrey Borzenkov : > > > В Пн., 24/09/2012 в 11:37 +0200, Mads Kiilerich пишет: > > >> On 09/24/2012 08:51 AM, Michael Chang wrote: > > >> > We don't insert gettext module

Re: [2.00] grub-install use on UEFI system?

2012/9/25 Chris Murphy > > On Sep 25, 2012, at 6:17 AM, yannubu...@gmail.com wrote: > > > With 1.99, i only had to use 'grub-install' (without any parameter, and > not necessarily booted in EFI mode). > It would be nice (for retrocompatibility) if 2.00 could do the same (eg it > could guess the 3

Re: [2.00] grub-install use on UEFI system?

On Sep 25, 2012, at 6:17 AM, yannubu...@gmail.com wrote: > > With 1.99, i only had to use 'grub-install' (without any parameter, and not > necessarily booted in EFI mode). > It would be nice (for retrocompatibility) if 2.00 could do the same (eg it > could guess the 32/64 architecture, and set

Re: [PATCH] suppress error message "/grub2/locale/en.mo.gz not found"

В Вт., 25/09/2012 в 12:46 +0800, Michael Chang пишет: > 2012/9/25 Andrey Borzenkov : > > В Пн., 24/09/2012 в 11:37 +0200, Mads Kiilerich пишет: > >> On 09/24/2012 08:51 AM, Michael Chang wrote: > >> > We don't insert gettext module if message catalog file missing to > >> > prevent error message fro

Re: [2.00] grub-install use on UEFI system?

Try using the command: > grub-install --target=x86_64-efi --efi-directory=" eg. /boot/efi>" > Thank you Aaron With 1.99, i only had to use 'grub-install' (without any parameter, and not necessarily booted in EFI mode). It would be nice (for retrocompatibility) if 2.00 could do the same (eg it cou