On Thu, Oct 18, 2007 at 05:58:17PM +0300, Vesa Jääskeläinen wrote:
>
> If this is some new arch that will be supported on i386 then I would
> suggest i386/linuxbios/.
AFAICT, the declarations that I moved are not LinuxBIOS-specific in nature.
Sure, EFI wasn't using them, but AFAICT that's just be
Robert Millan wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 17, 2007 at 09:17:54PM +0300, Vesa Jääskeläinen wrote:
>> Robert Millan wrote:
>>> This patch splits the i386-generic part of i386/pc/loader.h into
>>> i386/loader.h.
>>>
>>> Comments?
>> Why did you move stuff from i386/pc to i386 ?
>>
>> I do see a point on run
On Wed, Oct 17, 2007 at 09:17:54PM +0300, Vesa Jääskeläinen wrote:
> Robert Millan wrote:
> > This patch splits the i386-generic part of i386/pc/loader.h into
> > i386/loader.h.
> >
> > Comments?
>
> Why did you move stuff from i386/pc to i386 ?
>
> I do see a point on running grub2 on non-pc i
Robert Millan wrote:
> This patch splits the i386-generic part of i386/pc/loader.h into
> i386/loader.h.
>
> Comments?
Why did you move stuff from i386/pc to i386 ?
I do see a point on running grub2 on non-pc i386...
___
Grub-devel mailing list
Grub
Committed.
--
Robert Millan
I know my rights; I want my phone call!
What use is a phone call, if you are unable to speak?
(as seen on /.)
___
Grub-devel mailing list
Grub-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hi,
[...]
> 2007-10-17 Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> * include/grub/i386/loader.h: New file.
>
> * include/grub/i386/pc/loader.h (grub_linux_prot_size): Moved to ...
> * include/grub/i386/loader.h (grub_linux_prot_size): ... h
This patch splits the i386-generic part of i386/pc/loader.h into i386/loader.h.
Comments?
--
Robert Millan
I know my rights; I want my phone call!
What use is a phone call, if you are unable to speak?
(as seen on /.)
2007-10-17 Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* include/grub/i386/loader
