Hi :)
From a users pov.
The thing i like about the current system is that it now successfully picks-up
the various "Recovery" partitions created by OEMs or by Windows 7 (probably
others too)
Ideally i would like the main Windows partitions near the top of the menu and
those "Recovery" ones
On 05.06.2013 21:03, Andrey Borzenkov wrote:
> В Wed, 05 Jun 2013 20:43:58 +0200
> Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko пишет:
>
>> On 05.06.2013 19:58, Andrey Borzenkov wrote:
>>> В Wed, 05 Jun 2013 12:21:54 -0500
>>> Bruce Dubbs пишет:
>>>
Mads Kiilerich wrote:
> On 05/31/2013 07:03
В Wed, 05 Jun 2013 20:43:58 +0200
Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko пишет:
> On 05.06.2013 19:58, Andrey Borzenkov wrote:
> > В Wed, 05 Jun 2013 12:21:54 -0500
> > Bruce Dubbs пишет:
> >
> >> Mads Kiilerich wrote:
> >>> On 05/31/2013 07:03 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Vladimir 'φ-coder/phc
Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko wrote:
On 05.06.2013 19:58, Andrey Borzenkov wrote:
В Wed, 05 Jun 2013 12:21:54 -0500
Bruce Dubbs пишет:
Mads Kiilerich wrote:
On 05/31/2013 07:03 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko wrote:
I must say I'm generally disappointe
On 05.06.2013 19:58, Andrey Borzenkov wrote:
> В Wed, 05 Jun 2013 12:21:54 -0500
> Bruce Dubbs пишет:
>
>> Mads Kiilerich wrote:
>>> On 05/31/2013 07:03 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko wrote:
> I must say I'm generally disappointed with os-prober and hav
В Wed, 05 Jun 2013 12:21:54 -0500
Bruce Dubbs пишет:
> Mads Kiilerich wrote:
> > On 05/31/2013 07:03 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> >> Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko wrote:
> >>
> >>> I must say I'm generally disappointed with os-prober and have
> >>> ideas to move away from it. I'll start anoth
On 05.06.2013 17:56, Mads Kiilerich wrote:
> On 05/31/2013 07:03 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>> Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko wrote:
>>
>>> I must say I'm generally disappointed with os-prober and have
>>> ideas to move away from it. I'll start another topic for it.
>>
>> I agree. I would prefe
Mads Kiilerich wrote:
On 05/31/2013 07:03 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko wrote:
I must say I'm generally disappointed with os-prober and have
ideas to move away from it. I'll start another topic for it.
I agree. I would prefer adding an include command so grub.
В Wed, 05 Jun 2013 17:56:40 +0200
Mads Kiilerich пишет:
> On 05/31/2013 07:03 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> > Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko wrote:
> >
> >> I must say I'm generally disappointed with os-prober and have
> >> ideas to move away from it. I'll start another topic for it.
> >
> > I
On 05/31/2013 07:03 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko wrote:
I must say I'm generally disappointed with os-prober and have
ideas to move away from it. I'll start another topic for it.
I agree. I would prefer adding an include command so grub.cfg could
just do some
On May 31, 2013, at 1:03 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko wrote:
>
>> I must say I'm generally disappointed with os-prober and have
>> ideas to move away from it. I'll start another topic for it.
>
> I agree. I would prefer adding an include command so grub.cfg co
Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko wrote:
I must say I'm generally disappointed with os-prober and have
ideas to move away from it. I'll start another topic for it.
I agree. I would prefer adding an include command so grub.cfg could
just do something like:
include /boot/grub/grub.d/*.cf
On 31.05.2013 16:48, Andrey Borzenkov wrote:
> В Mon, 1 Oct 2012 13:25:50 +0200
> "Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko" пишет:
>
>> I haven‘t had time to view in details but os-prober isn‘t managed by us but
>> by debian-boot team so you need to contact them. Also I‘d prefer more of
>> detection to be
В Mon, 1 Oct 2012 13:25:50 +0200
"Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko" пишет:
> I haven‘t had time to view in details but os-prober isn‘t managed by us but
> by debian-boot team so you need to contact them. Also I‘d prefer more of
> detection to be done on runtime than it‘s done in current model
In th
I haven‘t had time to view in details but os-prober isn‘t managed by us but
by debian-boot team so you need to contact them. Also I‘d prefer more of
detection to be done on runtime than it‘s done in current model
On Sep 29, 2012 5:04 PM, "Andrey Borzenkov" wrote:
> Attached are suggested implemen
2012/9/29 Andrey Borzenkov
> Attached are suggested implementation for UEFI support. Because ESP can
> contain arbitrary number of boot entries, it is itself implemented as
> extensible framework.
>
> 1. /usr/lib/os-prober/mounted/05efi
>
> Makes basic plausibility checks (FAT and /EFI exists) an
Attached are suggested implementation for UEFI support. Because ESP can
contain arbitrary number of boot entries, it is itself implemented as
extensible framework.
1. /usr/lib/os-prober/mounted/05efi
Makes basic plausibility checks (FAT and /EFI exists) and calls scripts
from /usr/lib/os-prober/m
17 matches
Mail list logo
