On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 4:47 PM, Matthias Clasen mcla...@redhat.com wrote:
GTK+ 2.16.6 is now available for download at:
ftp://ftp.gtk.org/pub/gtk/2.16/
http://download.gnome.org/sources/gtk+/2.16/
Any chance or problem for the windows binaries on the website/ftp?
I'm too used to update
Any chance or problem for the windows binaries on the website/ftp?
Sorry, I had forgotten to upload them. Should be there soonish.
--tml
___
gtk-app-devel-list mailing list
gtk-app-devel-list@gnome.org
Tristan Van Berkom wrote:
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 2:53 AM, Emmanuel
Touzeryemmanuel.touz...@free.fr wrote:
Hi,
[...]
You know what I'm thinking... I think that this is from times where people
used to build GUIs in the code... When they were writing all the
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 2:12 PM, Thomas Stover tho...@wsinnovations.com wrote:
[...]
Indeed. Not building interfaces manually may save time now and then, but it
hinders your understanding of what is happening. For instance when you want
to dynamically make interface changes at run time your
Tristan Van Berkom wrote:
Im not exactly sure what your trying to say, my understanding is that
in the modern world you create widget subclasses when you need
composite/dynamic widgets, all widgets are generally layed out in some
kind of form, or multiple forms.
Thats my understanding of the
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 3:24 PM, Thomas Stover tho...@wsinnovations.com wrote:
[...]
Well that's pretty much how I see it, but creating new derived widgets is
not always the same thing as dynamic interface manipulation. The issue that
grabbed my attention more was the notion of always using
Tristan Van Berkom wrote:
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 3:24 PM, Thomas Stover tho...@wsinnovations.com wrote:
[...]
Well that's pretty much how I see it, but creating new derived widgets is
not always the same thing as dynamic interface manipulation. The issue that
grabbed my attention more was
Hi,
Indeed. Not building interfaces manually may save time now and then,
but it hinders your understanding of what is happening. For instance
when you want to dynamically make interface changes at run time your
left with simple hide show tricks. I can remember more than once
when I wanted
Emmanuel Touzery wrote:
It startles me that it doesn't seem to bother people much that all the
widget variables are declared as GtkWidget*.
Well, if you want you can use variables of type GtkWidgetOfTypeX * and
type cast on the call of constructor. You have to type cast back to
GtkWidget *
On Wed, 9 Sep 2009 12:23:07 -0400 (EDT)
Marshall Lake ml...@mlake.net wrote:
I tried G_PRIORITY_HIGH_IDLE with similar results ... the idle
function is called only with the following code:
g_idle_add_full (G_PRIORITY_HIGH_IDLE, (GSourceFunc)
idlefunc, NULL, NULL); while
10 matches
Mail list logo
