On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 12:59 AM, shiv garg shivgarg5...@hotmail.com wrote:
I am developing a gtk application in which I need to insert n no of widgets
at runtime..
Say a number n that is scanned from user then I need to insert n rows each
containing a button and a checkbox
You can do
On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 7:53 AM, aullidolu...@gmail.com
aullidolu...@gmail.com wrote:
The strings 0 to 9 are displayed as expected on the treeview. The idea
is if I hit GDK_KEY_Up (since there's no upper level) should select the
last one; my function moveItemUP, does work in someway, because
On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 1:10 AM, Ken Bass daytoo...@gmail.com wrote:
The image is a captured video frame that can be in one of several formats
(eg, yuv420, rgb8/24/32, jpeg/mjpeg). That is, I can provide it in any of
those formats. It is in memory - not a file. And it would need be updated
On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 2:18 AM, Lucas Levrel llev...@yahoo.fr wrote:
Le 5 mars 2014, Chris Angelico a écrit :
The sources to all of GTK? I don't know, I haven't looked; but since
I'm not actually compiling GTK myself, I'd need to figure out exactly
what sources are actually necessary.
E
On Sat, Mar 8, 2014 at 12:55 PM, Chris Angelico ros...@gmail.com wrote:
1) My script will have a one-command action which will, after
confirmation, download eighteen separate DLLs from my web site.
With a little more dependency-chasing that's become twenty DLLs, but
the concept is materially
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 10:18 PM, Lucas Levrel llev...@yahoo.fr wrote:
En date de : Mer 5.3.14, Chris Angelico ros...@gmail.com a écrit :
The very easiest solution for my users would be for me to
distribute a .ZIP file of eighteen DLLs, which my app can fetch and
deploy. But that would require
On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 1:44 AM, Chris Moller mol...@mollerware.com wrote:
I was actually writing that testcase when I found a correlation: I'm using
gcc and my callbacks were nested functions. Pull the callbacks out and make
them normal, top-level, functions, and it all works even without no
On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 5:43 AM, Chris Moller mol...@mollerware.com wrote:
gcc supports nested functions as an extension to standard C. I tend to use
them a lot because they operate within the stack frame of the enclosing
function, thereby minimising the amount of information you have to pass.
On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 6:27 AM, Chris Moller mol...@mollerware.com wrote:
On 03/05/14 13:52, Chris Angelico wrote:
Is there a reason you're trying to write high-level code in C?
Habit, mostly. I've been coding in C since the early 80s and I can do it in
my sleep. Python's okay, but I tend
I have a Pike GTK app that works on Windows and Linux (and
theoretically other platforms but I haven't tested it). The Windows
version of Pike distributes GTK DLLs for 2.12.11, which has some flaws
compared to 2.24.10 which I use elsewhere. So it would be convenient
for my users if I could have a
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 12:27 PM, Daniel Kasak d.j.kasak...@gmail.com wrote:
If you're in doubt, I think the best way to do this is to distribute things
separately. Just make an installer / updater for the GTK libs ( that would
be handy, by the way ... oh and if you build some Windows themes,
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 6:20 PM, Chris Moller mol...@mollerware.com wrote:
No, they're not the same value. They're all for setting an angle, in
radians, pi-radians, and degrees, and I want the user to be able to set the
angle in any unit and have the equivalent angle in the other units show up
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 6:29 PM, Tristan Van Berkom
tris...@upstairslabs.com wrote:
Interesting, if I were you I would try to share the same adjustment
between all of your views.
I.e. I would keep the adjustment in the finest grained unit of each
unit you want to display, and have your spin
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 11:05 PM, Bric b...@flight.us wrote:
FWIF: with this drive to keep upgrading, I just lost a critical hour of
sleep (I start new class material today and needed to be rested) because I
messed up the one and only thing you should NEVER mess up in your system:
network
On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 10:30 PM, Bric b...@flight.us wrote:
(Unity completely and majorly sucks, by the way. And the upgrade has
wiped out major settings, like /etc/bash.bashrc (!??), gnome panels, and
lots more!)
Unrelated to your main issues, but I'll put in a plug for Xfce. When
Ubuntu
On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 4:52 AM, Bric b...@flight.us wrote:
GTK on MacOSX requires a few dependencies to build and those script
download them all and build them with clang default compiler without too
many issues.
https://wiki.gnome.org/action/show//Projects/GTK+/OSX/Building
Sorry, you
On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 7:45 AM, Bric b...@flight.us wrote:
But are we certain at this point that my latest compile failure is caused by
an old package(s)?
Easiest way to find out is probably to spin yourself up a newer OS
(Ubuntu 12.04 LTS Precise or 13.10 Saucy, or maybe Debian Wheezy,
which
Incidentally:
On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 7:45 AM, Bric b...@flight.us wrote:
It's rather bewildering that the make interpreter can't print out more
specifics about the breakage...
Makefiles are notorious for being hard to debug, partly because
they're often generated by a script. It's almost
On Sat, Feb 8, 2014 at 7:47 PM, Emmanuele Bassi eba...@gmail.com wrote:
to be fair, xdg-utils *should* be installed by default in any new
installation *and* when upgrading; I'd consider it a bug in the Debian
update process if it didn't. that's the whole point of the xdg-utils
tools, really:
On Sat, Feb 8, 2014 at 9:39 AM, christ...@bluepanel.org wrote:
Is there any proper way to do this or do I have use #ifdef syntax to
check for the system?
#ifdef __unix__
//my start code
#elif __WIN32__
// start windows code here
#else
// fallback code..?
#endif
If there
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 1:30 AM, Tristan Van Berkom
tris...@upstairslabs.com wrote:
You can get the behavior you are looking for with EggWrapBox:
https://git.gnome.org/browse/libegg/tree/libegg/wrapbox
Just copy the eggwrapbox.[ch] and compile it as a part of your
code (or compile a libegg
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 3:00 AM, Tristan Van Berkom
tris...@upstairslabs.com wrote:
Sorry I did not take into account that you were working with the
GTK+2 library and not GTK+3.
Ah, I should have mentioned, sorry. There has been talk of supporting
GTK3 in Pike, but I won't move to it till I can
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 3:19 AM, Tristan Van Berkom
tris...@upstairslabs.com wrote:
No, GtkToolbar != GtkToolPalette, they are separate things.
The GtkToolPalette is what we use in Glade to show all the
widget icons for example - there is a demo of it if you run
gtk-demo you should be able to
My application has a status bar which can have an arbitrary number of
items added to it. Currently, I use an Hbox with no padding, which
works fine as long as there aren't too many statusbar elements added;
but if there are a lot, the tail starts wagging the dog, in that the
size of the window
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 3:43 AM, James Tappin jtap...@gmail.com wrote:
If I interpret what you are trying to do correctly (not necessarily a
given), then I would have thought that GtkScrolledWindow (possibly in
conjunction with GtkViewport) would be the tool for the job.
Not scrolling,
On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 6:57 AM, David Marceau
uticdmarceau2...@yahoo.ca wrote:
C++ with gtkmm is straightforward and no qtcreator/gui builder
necessary. Just coding it by hand gives exact results.
...
I am going to rewrite the same app in golang with the go-gtk binding. I
can foresee it
On Fri, Dec 27, 2013 at 8:24 AM, Christoph Schmeding
schmed...@altair.de wrote:
We have the same need in our application, i.e. we don't want to validate or
commit on every change in the entry.
We also have hooked validation on the focus-out, and additionally on
activate, which is emitted
On Tue, Dec 24, 2013 at 9:14 PM, Nicola Fontana n...@entidi.it wrote:
Il Mon, 23 Dec 2013 22:19:28 -0800 A. Walton awal...@gnome.org scrisse:
Frankly I don't see what's wrong with making it instant apply from the
description. Connect to the GtkEditable::changed signal, throw in a short
On Mon, Dec 23, 2013 at 11:25 PM, Tristan Van Berkom
tris...@upstairslabs.com wrote:
We don't want to be chasing down scenarios where this could possibly
break, so the best thing we can do is commit everything immediately
(you could have an asynchronous layer in your data model which handles
' signal comes through, as that
would be hopelessly inefficient most of the time.
What's best practice here?
Chris Angelico
___
gtk-app-devel-list mailing list
gtk-app-devel-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-app-devel-list
On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 7:45 PM, Max Linke max_li...@gmx.de wrote:
Thanks that fixed it. So far Gtk looks nice and easier then I
expected :)
I quite like GTK, too. Most of my GUI work is in Pike, which is
semantically similar to Python (which I think is what you're using?).
GTK does a fine job
On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 9:43 PM, Max Linke max_li...@gmx.de wrote:
pack option was the right hint. I just saw that the expanding option is
hidden there in glade. After setting expand to yes for the
ScrolledWindow everything works like I expect it to.
Thanks for the quick help
Excellent! Glad
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 2:59 PM, David Buchan pdbuc...@yahoo.com wrote:
// Allocate memory on the heap, not stack.
msgdata = (msgdatas *) malloc (1 * sizeof (msgdatas));
msgdata-textview = (int *) malloc (1 * sizeof (int));
message = (char *) malloc (1024);
The only blocks of memory
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 9:28 PM, Chris Vine ch...@cvine.freeserve.co.uk wrote:
Otherwise, have you considered perhaps using something like the python
bindings for GTK+? These have a binding for g_idle_add() and handle
all the memory allocation for you. I recommend using the
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 2:00 AM, David Buchan pdbuc...@yahoo.com wrote:
Things I've learned yesterday are:
1. strdup() (I've never seen or used it before)
2. what the heck heap and stack mean (still more to learn there)
3. a more general and flexible solution is probably to use asynchronous
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 2:18 AM, David Buchan pdbuc...@yahoo.com wrote:
What I mean is, is it kosher to have:
msgdatas msgdata; // I'd pass msgdata as arg. to g_idle_add() I suppose.
No, it's most definitely not, unless you can guarantee that (a) the
function that called this will still be
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 2:56 AM, David Buchan pdbuc...@yahoo.com wrote:
Making the pointer to textview global would indeed simplify things
enormously. I guess I avoid global variables like the plague, having been
told to for years. Also wanted to make the idle function generic.
Yeah, lots of
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 2:56 AM, David Buchan pdbuc...@yahoo.com wrote:
PS. Socket programming is great fun! (
http://pdbuchan.com/rawsock/rawsock.html )
Absolutely! I don't usually use raw sockets though - I tend to use TCP
primarily, and sometimes UDP or ICMP, but not raw. TCP sockets equal
On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 2:39 AM, Sergei Kolomeeyets
kolomeey...@gmail.com wrote:
The question about the
possible meaning of GDK_KP_Enter, for instance, drivers me up the wall
really. I'm actually able to guess the meaning of Enter and GDK,,, But
what does that KP mean?
Keypad. That would be
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 7:56 PM, Gabriele Greco gabriele.gr...@darts.it wrote:
in Gypsum has barely started and I already have 50K lines; my RosMud
session currently has 300K lines of scrollback; and I've noted as an
unsolvable RosMud bug that it's unacceptably slow adding the
16,777,216th
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 4:44 AM, Gabriele Greco gabriele.gr...@darts.it wrote:
I suggest you to use GtkTextView for your text output, thank to GtkTextTag
it's flexible enough to do everything a mud client needs, also blinking
text, it scrolls at line boundaries and let you keep thousands of
with) that
forces the increments? I've been searching on Google and have come up
with a few bits and bobs, but most work with DrawingArea seems to be
pixel-based, not line-based, so there's no problem with scrolling by
pixels.
Thanks in advance!
Chris Angelico
42 matches
Mail list logo
