On Mon, 2006-11-13 at 02:15 -0500, Freddie Unpenstein wrote:
On Mon 10/23, James Scott Jr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am about to write the socket module of a program that follows the
gnu standard structure for a daemon. I am using glib wherever
possible and have a question concerning the
Andrea Zagli wrote:
Il giorno dom, 12/11/2006 alle 11.20 -0500, Tristan Van Berkom ha
scritto:
That is normal, I wouldnt expect calling gtk_widget_destroy() to
destroy your window, its the combination of calling gtk_widget_destroy()
*and returning to the mainloop* that will actually remove the
On Mon, Nov 13, 2006 at 01:02:57PM +0100, Jan-Oliver Wagner wrote:
No, I do not have 2.4 at hand. It is not handy to always install
the version that is the targetted minimum version of GTK+.
Today it is 2.4, tomorrow (for another project) 2.2 etc.
I don't think downloading and unpacking one
On Monday 13 November 2006 22:36, David Nečas (Yeti) wrote:
Mass removal of deprecated symbols *only* for the purpose of
removal of deprecated symbols is a good method to waste time
and bring new bugs.
my understanding of deprecated is that those methods are not
maintained anymore. Or at least
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
James Scott Jr wrote:
On Mon, 2006-11-13 at 02:15 -0500, Freddie Unpenstein wrote:
On Mon 10/23, James Scott Jr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am about to write the socket module of a program that follows the
gnu standard structure for a daemon. I
However, I learned that for quite a number of methods it is
a good idea to drop the deprecated ones and instead
use the replacements (less buggy, better UI, better source code
readability, less source code, better performance).
Usually it should indeed make sense, because otherwise there
On Mon, 2006-11-13 at 17:02 -0800, C.R. Kirkwood-Watts wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
James Scott Jr wrote:
On Mon, 2006-11-13 at 02:15 -0500, Freddie Unpenstein wrote:
On Mon 10/23, James Scott Jr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am about to write the socket
