Il 20/01/2012 18.08, Jack ha scritto:
However, that is separate from knowing that the button has been pushed,
so you can then start the communications. For this, is there any reason
to use a custom signal? Wouldn't it be easier to catch the standard
signal emitted when a button is pushed, by
On 01/23/2012 02:18 AM, Manuel Ferrero wrote:
Il 20/01/2012 18.08, Jack ha scritto:
However, that is separate from knowing that the button has been pushed,
so you can then start the communications. For this, is there any reason
to use a custom signal? Wouldn't it be easier to catch the
On Mon, 23 Jan 2012 08:41:22 -0700
Michael Torrie torr...@gmail.com wrote:
On 01/23/2012 02:18 AM, Manuel Ferrero wrote:
Il 20/01/2012 18.08, Jack ha scritto:
However, that is separate from knowing that the button has been
pushed, so you can then start the communications. For this, is
I'm learning GTK+ and I was able to write, compile and run a simple code
on my win32 PC to create a window with a button in it and monitor with a
callback if the user presses the button.
I learned that GTK+ reacts to user events signalling on the object that
received the event.
Now I'd like
Hi Manuel,
Please see glibGIOChannel. It is unified way to make I/O data
from files, sockets an so on.
I am using it for Ethernet sockets under win32.
Best regars,
Igor
2012/1/20, Manuel Ferrero mferr...@reer.it:
I'm learning GTK+ and I was able to write, compile and run a simple
On 01/20/2012 06:42 AM, Manuel Ferrero wrote:
I was wondering if there is some custom signal I can use to keep the
same event-driven philosophy to exchange messages between process.
Of course. Though the other poster's idea of using gio channels is a
good one. But yes you can create custom
On 2012.01.20 11:36, Michael Torrie wrote:
On 01/20/2012 06:42 AM, Manuel Ferrero wrote:
I was wondering if there is some custom signal I can use to keep the
same event-driven philosophy to exchange messages between process.
Of course. Though the other poster's idea of using gio channels is
