Hi,
Am Mittwoch, den 17.11.2010, 13:29 +0100 schrieb Max Schwarz:
Do you have an idea on how to implement this? I think Qt's model is quite
nice, they have a 'delta' field in their event [3] which gives more precise
information. Of course, If you want to retain API compability (which I think
Hi,
Am Mittwoch, den 17.11.2010, 16:25 +0100 schrieb Max Schwarz:
Do you have an idea on how to implement this? I think Qt's model is quite
nice, they have a 'delta' field in their event [3] which gives more
precise information. Of course, If you want to retain API compability
(which
Hi,
Am Freitag, den 25.06.2010, 14:12 -0400 schrieb Colin Walters:
On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 12:50 PM, Matthias Clasen
matthias.cla...@gmail.com wrote:
Fwiw, a big motivation for all the sealing business was to make it
possible that GTK3 _can_ move faster and incorporate more new stuff
Hi,
Am Mittwoch, den 02.06.2010, 04:26 +0300 schrieb Владимир:
On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 12:57 PM, Alexander Larsson al...@redhat.com
wrote:
On Mon, 2010-05-31 at 17:36 +0300, Владимир wrote:
There is nothing server about change notification
Hi Erik,
Am Dienstag, den 05.01.2010, 23:32 +1100 schrieb Erik de Castro Lopo:
I have written a small test program that can create independent toplevel
windows based on a command line parameter. Currently these top level
windows contain nothing more than a GtkLabel widget and destroy
Hi,
Am Mittwoch, den 04.11.2009, 06:23 +0100 schrieb Javier Jardón:
The question: why is it normal for GTK widget constructors to return
GtkWidget and not their real type?
Cody perfectly replied to that already.
PD: If there is not technical reasons, maybe we can change this for
GTK+ 3 (or
Benjamin,
Am Montag, den 13.07.2009, 16:52 +0200 schrieb Benjamin Otte:
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 3:55 PM, Martin Nordholtsense...@gmail.com wrote:
Always building the tests ensures that they are kept up do date with changes
in the rest of the code base. If they are not built along with the
Am Dienstag, den 05.05.2009, 18:57 -0700 schrieb patkhor:
I provide the user with the OK button, when user click on that button, the
program will create some number of threads (more than 10) and each threads
will do time-consuming work in the background. I successfully compiled my
program, but
Am Samstag, den 28.03.2009, 12:37 +0100 schrieb Christian Dywan:
Am Fri, 27 Mar 2009 17:38:12 -0700
schrieb Eugenia Loli-Queru el...@hotmail.com:
So, what about that link? :-)
Here's a patch. I'm not quite sure who decides if we can change it
back, but it's ready to go.
I don't think we
Am Montag, den 16.03.2009, 11:49 +0100 schrieb Alexander Larsson:
On Mon, 2009-03-16 at 10:23 +, Michael Meeks wrote:
On Sun, 2009-03-15 at 10:19 +0100, Alexander Larsson wrote:
But there are milllions of lines of code that does the rename as
atomic replace and the chances that
Hi,
Am Donnerstag, den 12.03.2009, 21:11 +0100 schrieb Alexander Larsson:
typedef enum {
G_FILE_CREATE_NONE= 0,
G_FILE_CREATE_PRIVATE = (1 0),
- G_FILE_CREATE_REPLACE_DESTINATION = (1 1)
+ G_FILE_CREATE_REPLACE_DESTINATION = (1 1),
+ G_FILE_CREATE_ASYNC_WRITE = (1 2),
}
Hi,
Am Montag, den 16.02.2009, 09:51 +0100 schrieb Alexander Larsson:
On Mon, 2009-02-09 at 18:27 -0800, C.J. Adams-Collier wrote:
I'm having a problem building gtk from Alex's branch. Am I doing
something wrong? I had jhbuild take care of building the deps and got
a jhbuild shell before
Hi,
Am Montag, den 19.01.2009, 03:08 -0500 schrieb Matthias Clasen:
On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 12:24 PM, Dr. David Alan Gilbert
gilbe...@treblig.org wrote:
* Matthias Clasen (matthias.cla...@gmail.com) wrote:
On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 8:19 PM, Dr. David Alan Gilbert
gilbe...@treblig.org wrote:
Am Montag, den 22.12.2008, 14:27 +0100 schrieb Olav Vitters:
On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 03:10:13PM +0200, Eugene Gorodinsky wrote:
Vala is a high level language which is translated to GObject and C, so
you are proposing to rewrite GObject using GObject.
Vala can be modified, since it is
Am Dienstag, den 02.12.2008, 14:55 +0100 schrieb Christian Dywan:
Am Tue, 2 Dec 2008 14:19:49 +0100
schrieb Nelson Benítez León [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
2008/12/2 Christian Dywan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Am Tue, 2 Dec 2008 14:03:01 +0100
schrieb Nelson Benítez León [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=562998
Regards,
Sven
___
gtk-devel-list mailing list
gtk-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
Hi,
Am Donnerstag, den 09.10.2008, 00:01 + schrieb Maciej Katafiasz:
Den Tue, 07 Oct 2008 16:55:29 -0400 skrev Behdad Esfahbod:
coda wrote:
Another possibility mentioned was making more use of GString.
Not a huge fan.
Why's that? GString is a very odd animal, we have it, it works
Am Montag, den 29.09.2008, 15:34 +0200 schrieb Christian Dywan:
Low hanging fruits:
Plus this one: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=548666
Bug 548666 – [PATCH] Allow searching for a given item in a GSequence
Patch attached; applies cleanly; documentation in there; even a test
case
Am Mittwoch, den 24.09.2008, 18:03 +0200 schrieb Xavier Bestel:
BTW where can I find a list of 2.90/3.0-deprecations ?
2.90 and 3.0 won't deprecate anything. Your list will be the list of
deprecated API shipped with 2.16.0.
Regards,
Sven
___
Am Montag, den 25.08.2008, 14:12 +0200 schrieb Murray Cumming:
At the least, any Yes/No stuff in the API reference documentation should
have a note saying that they are generally a bad idea, probably with a
link to the GNOME HIG.
And also, please mention that some languages don't even have
Am Freitag, den 15.08.2008, 15:06 +0200 schrieb Christian Dywan:
Am Fri, 15 Aug 2008 15:45:29 +0300
schrieb Tor Lillqvist [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I think both is rather open for missunderstandings actually, before and
after the improvement of the g_thread_init documentation.
g_mem_set_vtable
Am Sonntag, den 27.07.2008, 15:48 -0400 schrieb Patrick Hallinan:
I do not know why Werror would be enabled. If you cannot find the
reason,
then when the compilation fails and you get the jhbuild options as to
what to do,
pick Option 4 which gives you a shell. Enter the guile directory
Am Donnerstag, den 17.07.2008, 06:59 -0500 schrieb Travis Watkins:
On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 6:51 AM, Kalle Vahlman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The problem is this code cleanup release breaks everyone's
applications for no reason.
This is wrong for 2 reasons:
1. It does only breaks apps that don't
Hi,
Am Mittwoch, den 16.07.2008, 18:08 -0400 schrieb Paul Davis:
On Wed, 2008-07-16 at 16:51 -0400, Morten Welinder wrote:
i totally agree with those who are arguing against the current notion of
what GTK3 should be. i haven't seen any evidence that any of the
problems that our developers
out there, it's quite unlikely that you hit a massive bug like this).
Regards,
Sven
--
Sven Herzberg
Imendio AB - Expert solutions in GTK+
http://www.imendio.com
___
gtk-devel-list mailing list
gtk-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman
Hi Tommi,
Am Dienstag, den 18.03.2008, 11:56 +0200 schrieb Tommi Komulainen:
On Sat, 2008-03-15 at 21:03 +0100, ext ryan lortie wrote:
After some talk at the Hackfest about it, I'm writing the list to
officially request that glib and GTK be moved to LGPL version 3 or
later.
IANAL and
Quoting GPL 2:
»However, as a special exception, the source code distributed need not
include anything that is normally distributed (in either source or
binary form) with the major components (compiler, kernel, and so on) of
the operating system on which the executable runs, unless that component
Am Freitag, den 22.02.2008, 16:34 +0100 schrieb Alexander Larsson:
The first one concerns g_uri_get_scheme. The webkit developers has plans
to add a GUri object in glib, and g_uri_get_scheme (which takes a uri
string and returns the scheme part) would conflict with the g_uri_
namespace.
Am Mittwoch, den 30.01.2008, 10:54 +0200 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
The floating references in GTK make the whole reference counting a bit messy.
The following points make life easier:
* Always have a matching g_object_unref for each g_object_ref you have
You mean, g_object_ref_sink().
Am Freitag, den 21.12.2007, 11:05 +0100 schrieb Mathias Hasselmann:
Am Donnerstag, den 20.12.2007, 11:46 -0500 schrieb Havoc Pennington:
Third, since implementing an interface requires extra boilerplate
GObject stuff, it would be convenient for authors of a custom widget if
GtkWidget
Alexander Larsson wrote:
On Thu, 2007-12-13 at 14:50 +0100, Michael Natterer wrote:
Alexander Larsson wrote:
On Wed, 2007-12-12 at 16:46 +0100, Michael Natterer wrote:
Alexander Larsson wrote:
On Tue, 2007-12-11 at 17:48 +0100, Michael Natterer wrote:
Your API has g_test_rand_bit() which should (IMO) be called
g_test_rand_boolean() to match the fundamental type's name that's
used for this in glib (gboolean) and also to provide consistency with
g_rand_boolean(). I think a difference to the rest of the g_* API
isn't really helpful in
Alp Toker wrote:
Matthias Clasen wrote:
Well, I have certainly considered C ABI compatibility to be the main deciding
factor when making such decisions. I'd say if C# interfaces are inflexible
like
that then mapping GObject interfaces directly to C# interfaces was probably
wrong.
Kuang-Chun Cheng wrote:
Hi,
I'm studying GObject system and found that I can implement both
Pure Virtual Class (by setting all member functions NULL to make the
class pure virtual)
and an Interface in GObject.
I'm a C programmer without much C++ experiences, but according
to my
Havoc Pennington wrote:
If that makes sense, I'd suggest that others review and write up their
thinking on GooCanvas, perhaps reading some of the old threads, Piccolo,
HippoCanvas, etc. as background material. And also if there are other
canvas maintainers who want to put their hat in the
Carl Worth wrote:
On Mon, 30 Apr 2007 12:52:55 -0400, Havoc Pennington wrote:
The latest commit mentioned there talks about a 0.0.5 release, but I
don't know where a tar file for that might exist. Sven?
Yves had two small issues with my test-tarball of 0.0.5 and I'm going to
fix these
Carlos Garnacho wrote:
Hello!,
On Fri, 2007-04-20 at 17:11 +0200, Sven Herzberg wrote:
Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote:
There is something which bothers me though. Support for some units,
points for example, would require floating points measures. And I
suspect we don't want to do
Cody Russell wrote:
I'd like the canvas system to be generalized enough that we can have
multiple implementations of it, in the same way that GDK allows us to
port to Win32 or MacOSX. In particular, I think we could have an
implementation that is much like what most of the canvases are doing
Carlos Garnacho wrote:
First of all we need to specify the feature requirements for the
canvas. The following is a list of features I think we should
consider, hope it's a good start, please add to it if there are others:
- GTK+ suitable API.
- a11y support.
- Model/View split.
- Size
Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote:
There is something which bothers me though. Support for some units,
points for example, would require floating points measures. And I
suspect we don't want to do layout in floating point (instability
issues). Mozilla converts css units in twips (an arbitrary integer
On Mi, 2006-12-06 at 22:00 +0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The reality is that gtk is leaking.
Let's call it »Your test case is leaking« (whether or not GTK+ is the
source of that needs to be checked).
g_signal_newv() from within a g_object_new() from within a gtk_window_new()
isn't freed.
Hey Kaustubh,
On Mi, 2006-11-29 at 10:38 +0530, Kaustubh Atrawalkar wrote:
How to get a background running application into focus by another
application? I mean there is a gtk application running on which another
gtk application is running. Now i need to get that background
application
What is libccc?
===
Libccc is a canvas library designed to be easy to use and yet provide
many useful features to application developers.
Features:
* API is similar to Gnome Canvas (but avoids several API bugs from
Gnome Canvas)
* Model/View based interface
*
On Do, 2006-07-20 at 10:04 +0200, Murray Cumming wrote:
In the GTK+ meeting at GUADEC
( http://www.gtk.org/plan/meetings/20060625.txt )
there was talk of making GtkLabel editable.
For what is this needed?
You can to use that in UI builders like glade to edit menu items in
place.
Regards,
Hi there,
I spend the last weeks to develop a cairo based canvas for GTK+. When
developing that canvas I was inspired by the GNOME canvas API. For
people who have been using the GNOME canvas, it's very easy to use,
there's just one bis change: Model/View split.
The dependency list of that
Hi,
I think it would be easier for the GTK+ people if you could contribute
patches. If you're working with CVS (in case you don't: you should) just
edit the files you want to change ans then create a patch by executing:
cvs diff -Nup changes.patch
This will create a changes.patch file
46 matches
Mail list logo
