Re: Improve handling of bug reports for GTK+?

2012-08-11 Thread Xan Lopez
On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 8:29 PM, Andre Klapper wrote: > [Please CC me on answers as I am not subscribed ot this list.] > > The situation of GTK+ in bugzilla.gnome.org: > High number of open tickets, high number of unreviewed patches, > constantly growing number of tickets, no real triaging of repo

Re: i18n of app menus

2012-01-23 Thread Xan Lopez
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 3:22 PM, Shaun McCance wrote: > > So I just read this: > > http://developer.gnome.org/gio/2.31/gio-GMenu-Markup.html > > It turns out this: > > > > is really shorthand for this: > > >_New Window >app.new >n > > > or presumably this: > > >_Ne

Re: New rule

2010-10-21 Thread Xan Lopez
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 1:44 AM, Bastien Nocera wrote: > On Thu, 2010-10-21 at 17:33 +0100, Richard Hughes wrote: >> How about, if you plan to break API, it's mandatory to write entries >> in the migration guide. Heck, even a quick email to the mailing list >> explaining how to convert code might

Re: impending gdbus merge

2010-05-09 Thread Xan Lopez
On Sun, May 9, 2010 at 12:16 PM, Xan Lopez wrote: > > Problem on my side (the header include seems correctly protected and > all, although of course I'm on Linux... so not sure what's going on) > or something wrong in glib? FWIW from grepping the tree it would seem to get

Re: impending gdbus merge

2010-05-09 Thread Xan Lopez
On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 8:06 PM, Matthias Clasen wrote: > Hey, > > I thought I should let everybody know that we are getting very close > to merging gdbus into GLib. David has created a gdbus-merge branch > where we'll stage things before the final merge to master. So, if you > haven't payed attent

Re: filesystemmodel branch - initial testing

2009-09-30 Thread Xan Lopez
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 3:45 AM, Federico Mena Quintero wrote: > Humans from Earth, > > I'm finally testing Company's filesystemmodel branch.  IT IS SO FAST! > Really, it makes the file chooser much snappier.  And the code is a > pleasure to read. > > I haven't had crashes yet, although I haven't t

Re: Webkit-gtk and MacOSX

2009-08-26 Thread Xan Lopez
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 5:40 AM, Brian J. Tarricone wrote: > On 08/25/2009 06:04 PM, John Ralls wrote: > >> Thank you both for hashing this out for me. I'll persevere with getting >> Webkit-Gtk to build with quartz, then. I'm not sure I agree that it's >> "not that big": WebKit.framework clocks in

Re: Webkit-gtk and MacOSX

2009-08-25 Thread Xan Lopez
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 10:44 PM, Kristian Rietveld wrote: > On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 9:35 PM, Xan Lopez wrote: >> WebKit is the native layer on top of WebCore offered by each port for >> their platform, so the answer to that is: yes, WebKitGTK provides >> GObject APIs which

Re: Webkit-gtk and MacOSX

2009-08-25 Thread Xan Lopez
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 10:20 PM, Kristian Rietveld wrote: >> to provide a Gtk-Carbon shim library using the approach in >> http://developer.apple.com/documentation/Cocoa/Conceptual/DisplayWebContent/Tasks/CarbonApps.html >>  will it integrate OK with gdk-quartz and cairo-quartz? > > What I am wond

Re: g_malloc overhead

2009-01-29 Thread Xan Lopez
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 5:02 PM, Xavier Bestel wrote: > On Thu, 2009-01-29 at 16:51 +0200, Tor Lillqvist wrote: >> > I think strncpy() is one of the few that needs an utf8 equivalent, >> > because a char may span several bytes. >> >> Well, he didn't say exactly what semantics he wanted his >> g_ut

Re: g_malloc overhead

2009-01-29 Thread Xan Lopez
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 5:02 PM, Xavier Bestel wrote: > On Thu, 2009-01-29 at 16:51 +0200, Tor Lillqvist wrote: >> > I think strncpy() is one of the few that needs an utf8 equivalent, >> > because a char may span several bytes. >> >> Well, he didn't say exactly what semantics he wanted his >> g_ut

Re: Bikeshedding the invisible-char

2009-01-19 Thread Xan Lopez
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 4:07 AM, Federico Mena Quintero wrote: > Fedora has a (currently unapplied?) patch in its gtk2 package which > changes GtkEntry's invisible-char defualt from "*" to "*" (Unicode > 0x2022 BULLET). > > openSUSE has a patch that changes the invisible-char to "●" (Unicode > 0x2

Re: Logo (was Re: GTK+ Website Review)

2007-10-07 Thread Xan Lopez
On 10/7/07, Mikael Hallendal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 6 okt 2007 kl. 19.41 skrev Christophe Dehais: > > Hi, > > For what it's worth, I like it a lot! > > I personally like it much better than a variant of the current skewed > box. I wonder if I'm the only person alive that really likes the GTK

GTK Bug Report, Mid-August version

2007-08-16 Thread Xan Lopez
Key: + Change since last week s Simple patch m Moderately complex patch b Complex patch ! Looks good to me Fixed since last report: s! 361781 GtkViewport size request includes xthickness/ythickness for shadow_type=none [Owen] s 427899 GtkFrame's label may exceed the frame area s! 430049 gtk_se

Weekly Bug Report, 11/06/2007

2007-06-11 Thread Xan Lopez
There it goes. Feedback still welcome. Key: + Change since last week s Simple patch m Moderately complex patch b Complex patch Closed since last week: --- s 333791 Initial sort order for TreeView columns (WONTFIX) s 342471 TreeView accessor for TreeViewColumn [Kris, Matth

Weekly Bug Report 04/06/2007

2007-06-04 Thread Xan Lopez
Where applicable, I've put in brackets the last maintainer(s) to "touch" the bug report, but anyone is welcome to give his input. Comments or ideas on how to improve the reports would be greatly appreciated. I think in the near future the reports will be mostly centered around cleaning up the ho

Weekly Bug Report, 26/05/2007

2007-05-26 Thread Xan Lopez
Where applicable, I've put in brackets the last maintainer(s) to "touch" the bug report, but anyone is welcome to give his input. Comments or ideas on how to improve the reports would be greatly appreciated, but I think in the near future the reports will be mostly centered around cleaning up the

Re: GTK+ Web site overhaul

2007-04-30 Thread Xan Lopez
On 4/30/07, Tim Janik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, 30 Apr 2007, Martyn Russell wrote: > > > Tim Janik wrote: > gtk-doc.sgml? there's no such file, did you mean gtk-faq.sgml? > that is part of the gtk+ module so it gets shipped together with > gtk, and given the right sgml tools, also gets b

Re: GTK+ Love

2007-03-07 Thread Xan Lopez
Ugh, sorry, some mail server decided to eat the mails regarding this thread and I just found out that you had answered me. On 3/6/07, Bob Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm in California, and have a pretty flexible schedule. If we > prearrange it, I could generally be available for IRC on thi

Re: GTK+ Love

2007-03-05 Thread Xan Lopez
Hi! On 3/3/07, Bob Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This all sounds like a great idea. I work for a company that's > actively using and modifying various open-source components, > including GTK+, and this would be a good way to get involved with the > community and learn how to submit changes b

GTK+ Love

2007-03-02 Thread Xan Lopez
Hi, it's a pretty well known fact at this point that gtk+ has a severe shortage of maintainers and developers. It's usually quite hard to get strong contributors in any free software project, but big and complex software like gtk+ only makes things worse :) I've got two ideas in mind to try to impr