Re: GtkGlArea render fps is different than monitor frame rate

call "VSync" : i.e. your FPS are higher than 60, but you programmatically force it down to 60. The benefit is avoiding what we call "tearing", which is a display artifact that your eye could notice. Regards, Tarnyko Ferenc Engárd writes: Hi, I have a strange issue

Re: Outdated win32 bundle

is the only known CI service (to me) that compiles the stuff with VS. Visual Studio is another beast entirely. The GNOME Foundation kindly provided us with a VM that we can use to do Windows builds — which is what Tarnyko was using — using cross-compilation. So, VM is not running Windows if we're

Re: Outdated win32 bundle

the CI system on one of your computers or VMs. Regards, Tarnyko Emmanuele Bassi writes: Hi; On 8 June 2015 at 19:02, Bálint Réczey bal...@balintreczey.hu wrote: Hi Daniel, 2015-06-07 16:57 GMT+02:00 Daniel Espinosa eso...@gmail.com: Please use at least Gtk+ 3.14.9 because it fixes a bug

GTK+3/Win32 : looking for help

=node/48 So if anybody wants to contribute, he's more than welcome to answer this thread, or show up on IRC. Regards, Tarnyko ___ gtk-devel-list mailing list gtk-devel-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list

Re: gtkglarea 2.1.0 released

). Do you think it could be merged ? Cheers, -- Javier Jardón Cabezas ___ gtk-devel-list mailing list gtk-devel-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list Regards, Tarnyko ___ gtk

Re: GTK+3 Win32 Bundles : RFC

Hi Murray, Murray Cumming writes: On Wed, 2013-12-04 at 07:40 +0100, Tarnyko wrote: Hi folks, Just some news on the Win32 - bundle distribution - side. Main URL : http://win32builder.gnome.org/ The continuous build environment now generates 64-bit bundles. The bundle for GTK

Re: port Gtk 3.10 to windows

refer to this mail : https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gtk-devel-list/2013-December/msg6.html which also explains the various issues preventing them to land on the official website yet. Regards, Tarnyko ___ gtk-devel-list mailing list gtk-devel

GTK+3 Win32 bundles available on gtk.org

been patient with each of my requests to install something on GNOME's VM ; Martyn Russell who manages the site ; Martin Schlemmer and Andy Spencer for their patches ; and everyone who participated on Bugzilla (bug 695600, you know who you are !). Regards, Tarnyko

Re: Hicolor icon theme

/listinfo/gtk-devel-list Regards, Tarnyko ___ gtk-devel-list mailing list gtk-devel-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list

Re: GTK+3 Win32 Bundles : RFC

in a different schedule (keeping the 5 last bundles, once per week, put Git revision numbers therein... e.g.), please let me know. Regards, Tarnyko ___ gtk-devel-list mailing list gtk-devel-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel

Re: GTK+3 Win32 Bundles : RFC

Whoops, malformed link : http://win32builder.gnome.org Tarnyko writes: Hi folks, Some news on the GTK+ Win32 bundles provided on http://http://win32builder.gnome.org. - a 3.8.2 bundle is now available, with MSVC import libraries (thanks to Dieter for his amazing tips). A 3.10

Re: GTK+3 Win32 Bundles : RFC

fanc...@yahoo.com.tw writes: Hello Tarnyko, Hi Fan, Hmm, the print demo didn't crash for me at least on 3.10.0, when built with Visual Studio. Does it crash for you in 3.10.0? I might try to build git master soon to test that It worked in 3.8 ; crashing Git version displays 3.11

Re: GtkGlArea port to GTK+3 : RFYC

. Regards, Tarnyko John Stowers writes: For posterity and google, there is also a working port of gtkglext to gtk3 https://github.com/tdz/gtkglext John On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 10:28 AM, Nicolas Silva nical.si...@gmail.comwrote: On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 7:48 AM, Tarnyko tarn

Getting a Wayland surface from a GdkWindow

'GDK_IS_WAYLAND_WINDOW (window)' failed What am I doing wrong ? Thanks for your time. Regards, Tarnyko ___ gtk-devel-list mailing list gtk-devel-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list

Re: Getting a Wayland surface from a GdkWindow

Hi Florian, Thank you very much, that was it. Confused I didn't get it at the first spot. Florian Müllner writes: On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 4:09 PM, Tarnyko tarn...@tarnyko.net wrote: GtkWindow window = gtk_window_new (GTK_WINDOW_TOPLEVEL); GdkWindow *w = gtk_widget_get_window (GTK_WIDGET

Re: GtkGlArea port to GTK+3 : RFYC

on this when trying to port GNOME Chess (http://www.tarnyko.net/en/?q=node/40). Regards, Tarnyko Tarnyko writes: Hi folks, I recently needed a cross-platform way to display an OpenGL context in a GTK+3 Window ; I checked Gnome-Chess to get example, but it uses GLX directly (doesn't work

GTK+3 Win32 Bundles : RFC

unexperienced on this topic). I'll soon link this post to https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=695600, so we can have the bundles on the gtk.org website. Regards, Tarnyko ___ gtk-devel-list mailing list gtk-devel-list@gnome.org https

Re: GTK+3 Win32 Bundles : RFC

better not imagine how hard it could be with an emulation layer such a Wine... -- Cheers, Alberto Ruiz Regards, Tarnyko ___ gtk-devel-list mailing list gtk-devel-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list

Re: GTK+3 Win32 Bundles : RFC

Hi Matthew, Matthew Brush writes: Personally, I'd rather have as much as possible in the bundle and choose what to leave out of the the applications' installers, although it doesn't matter too much as long as the left-out binaries/libraries are available as compatible separate downloads.

Re: GtkGlArea port to GTK+3 : RFYC

, and WGL on Windows, transparently. So if you'd use GtkGLArea, you'd have a single code and recompile it with no changes on Unix and Win32. That's the whole point of the library. Regards, Vincent LE GARREC Regards, Tarnyko ___ gtk-devel-list

GtkGlArea port to GTK+3 : RFYC

to upgrade lib version from 2.X.X to 3.X.X ? Better work with Clutter-COGL-GTK3 ? Any feedback appreciated. Regards, Tarnyko ___ gtk-devel-list mailing list gtk-devel-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list

Re: Regarding gdbus-codegen

John, John Emmas writes: At the time I tried versions 2.7 and 3.1 but they both gave me the same problem. Going back to Tarnyko's email On 17/07/2013 19:55, Tarnyko wrote: - in gdbus-codegen, we have : path=$PATH:/lib/gdbus-2.0 from codegen import codegen_main That's a bit

Re: Regarding gdbus-codegen (was: Re: glib-mkenums in glib 2)

path change : https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=702862 Regards, Tarnyko Fan Chun-wei writes: Hi John, (list people: I understand this is a rather old topic that was brought up few months ago:) ). I was poking around with the Python scripts for gdbus-codegen lately, and I

Re: Regarding gdbus-codegen

+3.6.4 from : http://www.tarnyko.net/repo/gtk3_build_system gtk+-bundle_3.6.4-20130513_win32.zip Running : python gdbus-codegen Regards, Tarnyko John Emmas writes: Thanks guys. My memory is hazy now but from what I can recall, any lines like this were always problematic;- from

Re: Windows 32/64bit downloads and/or bundles for 2.x and 3.x

Hi Garrett, I maintain a GCC/MinGW build environment for GTK+ these days ; but I'm interested as well, so I might join the channel if nobody minds. Regards, Tarnyko Garrett Serack writes: Awesome! I’ll pop into your #hexchat-devel IRC channel tomorrow if you want to chat about

Broadway on win32 [patch]

Hi fellow devs, The following patch is for latest stable GTK+, and allows Broadway to compile and run on Win32. https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=701707 More details to be found in the bug report. Could someone please review this ? Regards, Tarnyko

Re: GTK+3 win32/64 build environment

Hi, Could someone review the build environment (https://git.gnome.org/browse/gtk3-build-system), so we can see what needs corrections/improvements ? (and possibly, if everything is OK, discuss a planning for a release ? ^^) Regards, Tarnyko tarn...@tarnyko.net writes: Hi folks

Re: GTK+3 win32/64 build environment

+3 from 32-bit/64-bit Linux (CentOS 6) ; Regards, Tarnyko ___ gtk-devel-list mailing list gtk-devel-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list

Re: GtkAppChooser custom command patch

___ gtk-devel-list mailing list gtk-devel-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list Regards, Tarnyko ___ gtk-devel-list mailing list gtk-devel-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman

Re: GTK+3 win32/64 build environment

Olav, Olav Vitters writes: On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 03:37:41AM +0200, tarn...@tarnyko.net wrote: I will upload all scripts to Git as soon as I get my account approved. What steps did you take? I did not get any voucher request for 'bugzilla.gnome.org'. Sorry I saw your message a bit late

Re: Windows 32/64bit downloads and/or bundles for 2.x and 3.x

. ___ gtk-devel-list mailing list gtk-devel-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list Regards, Tarnyko ___ gtk-devel-list mailing list gtk-devel-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list

Re: GTK+3 win32/64 build environment

-compiling GTK+3 from Linux requires to build the stack twice. It's no big deal, just that the Linux buildenv has more specific scripts -I'm currently rewriting them. I will upload all scripts to Git as soon as I get my account approved. Thanks a lot for your advices. Regards, Tarnyko

Re: GTK+3 win32/64 build environment

Arnel, Arnel A. Borja writes: I don't know that there's a free version of Windows :D. Now, regarding what Kevin digged out with the license, we know that it's not so free :-(. Short version : cross-compiling GTK+3 is a headaches generator. It's not easy nor efficient, and hard to

Re: GTK+3 win32/64 build environment

infrastructure. Will apply for it now. Regards, Tarnyko ___ gtk-devel-list mailing list gtk-devel-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list

Re: GTK+3 win32/64 build environment

-get install mingw), or is there such a thing as a standalaone mingw env available in a tarball ? Regards, Tarnyko For the Mac OSX build all the developers have to build their own libraries using Xcode because there are no official binaries and no cross compilers. I don't like

Re: GTK+3 win32/64 build environment

Hi Marc, Wow wow wow, lots of things there :-). Marc-André Lureau writes: It would be better if you could check in your scripts in a repository, so one could more easily study and eventually contribute to your effort. All the binaries should be fetched or build from the source (and

Re: GTK+3 win32/64 build environment

Dieter Verfaillie writes: I you mean the paths stated inside .pc files, then pkg-config on windows should be able to automatically deduce the correct value for ${prefix} based on the location where said package is installed [1] and ignore whatever is stated as ${prefix} inside the .pc file. No

Re: GTK+3 win32/64 build environment

? There's expat too, but yes you've listed most of them. Regards, Tarnyko ___ gtk-devel-list mailing list gtk-devel-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list

Re: GTK+3 win32/64 build environment

available on IRC channel for discussions, too. Regards, Tarnyko ___ gtk-devel-list mailing list gtk-devel-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list

Re: GTK+3 win32/64 build environment

;-). Regards, Tarnyko ___ gtk-devel-list mailing list gtk-devel-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list

Re: GTK+3 win32/64 build environment

this section carefully. IANAL neither, but if there is a doubt, we should not use the software. Sorry for having suggested that btw, shoud have been more precautionous. Regards, Tarnyko Thanks, Kevin From: gtk-devel-list [gtk-devel-list-boun

GTK+3 win32/64 build environment

that, but I need to know. Regards, Tarnyko ___ gtk-devel-list mailing list gtk-devel-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list

GtkAppChooser custom command patch

associations). Screenshots are available in the comment. The patch itself is unfinished, I'm mostly asking for feedback about the general idea and design. Regards, Tarnyko ___ gtk-devel-list mailing list gtk-devel-list@gnome.org https

Re: GtkAppChooser custom command patch

Thank you Bernard ! I've written the change due to recurring requests from my local user group (and other people, too). Any feedback is welcome. Regards, Tarnyko Bernhard Schuster writes: I did not look at your implementation, but the screenshots look very promising - in fact I think

Re: GtkAppChooser custom command patch

a useless patch. It does imply something for my past and future-planned contributions, too. Regards, Tarnyko Matthias Clasen writes: I don't think we want that in the app chooser, I'm afraid. Applications need to be installed properly, which will make them show up in the list of application

Re: [RC] GTK+ 3.4.2/3.6.4 Bundle (Win32)

64-bit buildenv and bundle now uploaded : http://www.tarnyko.net/repo/gtk3_build_system/ GTK+3.6.4_build_system_(win64)(v1).zip gtk+-bundle_3.6.4-20130329_win64.zip Looking for feedback on the website part : https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=695600 Regards, Tarnyko tarn

Re: [RC] GTK+ 3.4.2/3.6.4 Bundle (Win32)

produced and is available at : http://www.tarnyko.net/repo/gtk3_build_system/gtk+-bundle_3.6.4-20130327_win 32.zip Links will work in a few minutes. As for a personal opinion, I think it's ready for a release. Your suggestions and reviews are welcome ! Regards, Tarnyko tarn...@tarnyko.net writes

Re: [RC] GTK+ 3.4.2/3.6.4 Bundle (Win32)

Oops, sorry for the malformed links. Best to grab directly : http://www.tarnyko.net/repo/gtk3_build_system/ GTK+3.6.4_build_system_(win32)(v3).zip gtk+-bundle_3.6.4-20130327_win32.zip Regards, Tarnyko tarn...@tarnyko.net writes: Hi people, GTK+ 3.6.4 win32 build environment has been

Re: Is GTK+ a cross-platform toolkit ?

this :-(. Regards, Tarnyko Markus Elfring writes: Changed it to gray. ... -background-c: gray; +background-color: blue; I find that this patch indicates a different information. (Would you like to reorder the time sequence?) Which colours do you really prefer for improved

Re: Is GTK+ a cross-platform toolkit ?

awesome ^^). Regards, Tarnyko Andy Spencer writes: On 2013-03-15 00:45, tarn...@tarnyko.net wrote: That's nice. I will patch the 3.6.4 bundle to integrate the fix, so GtkNotebooks work again. I added a patch to the bug report that should fix the tab position issue. It's also available from

Re: Is GTK+ a cross-platform toolkit ?

...and as I forgot to mentiom, push the patch upstream to 3.6 using Bugzilla. I'm doing things by the book, Jose ^^. Regards, Tarnyko jose.ali...@gmail.com writes: On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 12:45 AM, tarn...@tarnyko.net wrote: That's nice. I will patch the 3.6.4 bundle to integrate

Re: Is GTK+ a cross-platform toolkit ?

that. Regards, Tarnyko Martin Schlemmer writes: On 3/15/2013 at 1:45 AM, tarn...@tarnyko.net wrote: For the Spinner problem you noticed (they don't spin) : it's not a Win32-specific bug. In fact, you can reproduce this on Linux by removing or commenting the gtk-theme line in /etc/gtk-3.0

Re: [RC] GTK+ 3.4.2/3.6.4 Bundle (Win32)

scripts work (cross-compiling from Win32 to Win64 is theorically possible but would require a huge rewrite). The 3.4.2 bundle can't be more complete, I think. Ready for release. Regards, Tarnyko tarn...@tarnyko.net writes: Hi Martin, Thanks for your intervention, very well appreciated

Re: Is GTK+ a cross-platform toolkit ?

/settings.ini (tested on Ubuntu Raring). This seems to be related to new code in gtkstylecontext.c which now runs animations only if a CSS theme has been loaded before (and that never happens when falling back to default theme). I'm tracking that down and will eventually post a patch. Regards, Tarnyko

Re: [RC] GTK+ 3.4.2/3.6.4 Bundle (Win32)

the rest works. I've seen your bug reports on GtkNotebook and Spinners too, currently trying to compile unstable and installing Linux to compare stuff. Regards, Tarnyko Martin Schlemmer writes: Hi, I know you asked for validation some time back, but I could not get time as yet, sorry. I

Re: [RC] GTK+ 3.4.2/3.6.4 Bundle (Win32)

. If nobody objects, I will be pushing the scripts and bundles to Bugzilla soon, as Emmanuele suggested. Regards, Tarnyko tarn...@tarnyko.net writes: Responding to myself for the sake of the cause. I've pushed a bug in Bugzilla for the patch I use to compile GTK+ : https

Re: [RC] GTK+ 3.4.2/3.6.4 Bundle (Win32)

As for the build scripts, they cover a lot more than pure GTK+ as they basically compile every dependency (including external ones like zlib, libpng...) so I'm not sure where I should push them. They are already in the bundles btw. Regards, Tarnyko tarn...@tarnyko.net writes: OK done, so I've replaced

Re: [RC] GTK+ 3.4.2/3.6.4 Bundle (Win32)

be the theme indeed ! I might do a lightweight theme containing only the needed icons. Better ideas ? Regards, Tarnyko tarn...@tarnyko.net writes: Hi folks, Following the discussion in this previous thread (https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gtk-devel-list/2013-March/msg00020.html), I am

Re: Is GTK+ a cross-platform toolkit ?

Hi Javier, 3.6.4 is stable ? So the work I'm doing right now is going to be worth it ^^. Thanks for the info, for the wiki thing too, I'm going to be back soon with some stuff. Regards, Tarnyko Javier Jardón writes: Hi, On 5 March 2013 11:32, tarn...@tarnyko.net wrote: OK

Re: Is GTK+ a cross-platform toolkit ?

Thanks, didn't know GTK+ used the odd/even versioning method, you people are all really helpful ! GTK+ 3.6.4 just finished compiling btw, creating the bundle right now. Regards, Tarnyko Allin Cottrell writes: On Wed, 6 Mar 2013, tarn...@tarnyko.net wrote: 3.6.4 is stable ? So

[RC] GTK+ 3.4.2/3.6.4 Bundle (Win32)

logs (see src/tarnyko/scripts/logs). Each build system is a complete MinGW/MSYS environments intended for installation on vanilla Windows XP/Vista/7/8. They are very straightforward to use if you follow the instructions carefully. They should work out-of-the-box. --- If you

Re: Is GTK+ a cross-platform toolkit ?

. Regards, Tarnyko Michael Torrie writes: On 03/04/2013 06:03 PM, tarn...@tarnyko.net wrote: (We're speaking policy here, but to support my point in technical terms : - my reusable GTK+3 build environment : http://www.tarnyko.net/repo/gtk3_build_system/ ; - sample bundle I have produced

Re: Is GTK+ a cross-platform toolkit ?

at someone's request. They are in the already existing binary package on my site (see link in first mail). Original requester said they were OK. So if there are issues, are we putting them in the official .zip archive ? They were in the previous ones. Regards, Tarnyko PS : read your remark

Re: Is GTK+ a cross-platform toolkit ?

. It works (see http://www.tarnyko.net/en/?q=node/23). But GTKmm is distributed separately from core GTK in Linux and MacPorts at least, so we should do the same here, shouldn't we ? Regards, Tarnyko Andy Spencer writes: As always, thank you for your work on this. I have been hoping for a while

Re: Is GTK+ a cross-platform toolkit ?

. Regards, Tarnyko ___ gtk-devel-list mailing list gtk-devel-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list

Re: Is GTK+ a cross-platform toolkit ?

, Tarnyko Emmanuele Bassi writes: hi; On 5 March 2013 11:32, tarn...@tarnyko.net wrote: OK, as a majority of people seem to be interested, here is what I will do : 1) Produce binaries of following GTK+3 versions : - 3.4.1 stable (http://packages.ubuntu.com/precise/libgtk-3-0, Debian

Is GTK+ a cross-platform toolkit ?

, Tarnyko ___ gtk-devel-list mailing list gtk-devel-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list

Is GTK+ a cross-platform toolkit ? (fwd)

have even already done that, having patched the code to integrate Broadway in the final win32 binaries (see here : http://www.tarnyko.net/en/?q=node/7). So I'm basically asking if the project would want to integrate my participation. Regards, Tarnyko - http://www.tarnyko.net/repo