Thanks, but problem solved in the meantime.
edscott wilson garcia rta:
Probably a hack but... if you append the row to a treepath greater than
that of the iterator, no problem. But if you append it to a path less
than that represented by the iterator, the iterator will be knocked off
track.
busmanus wrote:
Hi,
I downloaded and compiled pango-1.2.5, but it didn't help in itself,
althogh I haven't tried out every possibility with it yet. I still
have a suspicion that it's really Xft that I messed up things with.
I'd like to ask, what version of fontconfig and Xft is considered to
Hi,
I'm sorry, but the statement below by Reuben hits the nail on the
head for the user.
Sven's answer (also quoted below) assumes several things that just
aren't likely to happen unless you're advanced in the use of Linux and
in building and installing software packages. I read the docs
Hi,
Steve Grimaud [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm sorry, but the statement below by Reuben hits the nail on the
head for the user.
The user doesn't compile any packages. Perhaps the user installs a
binary package from time to time but actually she shouldn't even have
to bother with that.
On Tue, 2003-10-21 at 11:16, Steve Grimaud wrote:
I wonder why I should have to understand how the compiler
and linker work in order to install a program.
Because compiling a program is not installing a program.
If Linux and these install and configuration packages are so
powereful, the
Steve Grimaud wrote:
Hi,
I'm sorry, but the statement below by Reuben hits the nail on the
head for the user.
...
I tried building a program from source (jpilot) on RH9 (shrike). I
encountered a problem with not finding GTK+ 2.0.0 or higher (although
I believe it's somewhere on my
Hi David,
I think gtk_container_set_focus_vadjustment() is supposed to help here, but it's never worked that well for me. Perhaps someone could explain how to use it?
I hacked in my own scheme: look at the scrolledwindow adjustments to see what part of the window is visible, look at the widget
On Mon, 2003-10-20 at 08:49, Boszormenyi Zoltan wrote:
Hi,
is it possible to append a row to a TreeModel while having
an iterator going through the same model?
Probably a hack but... if you append the row to a treepath greater than
that of the iterator, no problem. But if you append it to a
On Mon, 2003-10-20 at 15:12, Tara Milana wrote:
Dear Micheal, what concearns me is the number of problems
other users are having with GTK. I am the head programmer
for WPE and we maintain over a dozen programs, none of which
have the amount of problems I've seen when I resigned on to
this
On Mon, 2003-10-20 at 17:41, David Bourguignon wrote:
Owen Taylor wrote:
David Bourguignon wrote:
Right now, if I understand correctly, I only have one option to know what device
pressed a button: derive a new class of button from the drawing area widget. Is
that correct?
I don't
On Tue, 2003-10-21 at 05:16, Steve Grimaud wrote:
I tried building a program from source (jpilot) on RH9 (shrike). I
encountered a problem with not finding GTK+ 2.0.0 or higher (although
I believe it's somewhere on my computer). I then downloaded GTK+; then
glib, pango, and atk+, since
Let's stop debating this particular problem as whether GTK+ is hard to
install or not. Getting errors about anonymous version tags is *not*
supposed to be part of the GTK+ install process, and certainly I don't
know exactly what is going on here and how to fix it.
What I would say that is this
Hi,
I upgrade my Xserver from 4.1.0 to 4.3.0, I recompiled with its new libraries
and all is okay...
Gael
___
gtk-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list
On 2003.10.20 20:20 Chad A Daelhousen wrote:
GTK+ simply expects anyone compiling from source to give it a clean
system to run on. If things were broken before it arrived, that can
hardly be blamed on GTK+ itself.
I just wished GTK wasn't so complex to compile, it's really not
a complex of a
On 2003.10.20 21:40 Michael Torrie wrote:
The problems you are experiencing are not GTK problems per se. They are
build environment problems. So in order to solve this I need to know
specifics about your build environment. What distro? What compiler
version? Binutils? What libraries
Hi!
I'm trying to compiling the GTK for the tinyX target but I cannot find
the right configure options... can anyone please help me?
Thanks in advance,
Rodolfo
___
gtk-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list
On Tue, 2003-10-21 at 18:48, Rodolfo Giometti wrote:
Hi!
I'm trying to compiling the GTK for the tinyX target but I cannot find
the right configure options... can anyone please help me?
Shouldn't need any. TinyX is just X.
Regards,
Owen
Hi,
On 2003.10.20 21:40 Michael Torrie wrote:
The problems you are experiencing are not GTK problems per se. They are
build environment problems.
Michael is right.
My distribution was originally Red Hat 6.0, now Red Hat 6.2.
Maybe you have some problems because you have an old
If you don't know whether, or where, it's installed, and you don't know how
to find out, you shouldn't be messing with source installs. You're likely to
break things.
That's one opinion, but not a good one.
Why not show him how to find them?
--
__
Brooklyn
On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 11:26:35AM +0200, Sven Neumann wrote:
Hi,
Steve Grimaud [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm sorry, but the statement below by Reuben hits the nail on the
head for the user.
The user doesn't compile any packages. Perhaps the user installs a
binary package from time
Darn RPM's are also broken. In fact, the source RPMs are often broken.
You should be able to install from source when the source is reasonably designed.
Ruben
--
__
Brooklyn Linux Solutions
__
DRM is THEFT - We are the STAKEHOLDERS
On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 11:20:11PM -0400, Chad A Daelhousen wrote:
At Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 03:19:40PM -0400, Ruben Safir Secretary NYLXS wrote:
If you're so unsure about its location that you're resorting to 'find', you
just bought yourself a 'find /'. Yes, over *all* the file systems.
That work is a waste if the software can't be compiled and upgraded smothly from
source.
Ruben
Those guys are working for you, never forget it.
You should be thanking them instead of whining.
--
Cédric
___
gtk-list mailing list
[EMAIL
On Tue, 2003-10-21 at 20:39, Ruben Safir Secretary NYLXS wrote:
This is basic knowledge for building software.
Not for Apache or Perl or X.
Really. That's the first I've heard of this. I wouldn't even attempt
to build X without understanding the basics of a unix build
environment. Apache
On Tue, 2003-10-21 at 20:37, Ruben Safir Secretary NYLXS wrote:
If you don't know whether, or where, it's installed, and you don't know how
to find out, you shouldn't be messing with source installs. You're likely to
break things.
That's one opinion, but not a good one.
There is a
On Tue, 2003-10-21 at 20:46, Ruben Safir Secretary NYLXS wrote:
/usr/lib, /usr/local/lib, $(PREFIX), $LDFLAGS, anything nonstandard in
/etc/ld.so.conf on Linux... and that's just for libraries, not includes.
The cure is worse than the disease.
I disagree. The cure is the cure. And
On Tue, 2003-10-21 at 20:41, Ruben Safir Secretary NYLXS wrote:
Darn RPM's are also broken. In fact, the source RPMs are often broken.
Which RPMS? RPMS typically do exactly what they advertize: They
install and work without problem on the platform they were intended to
run. Of course you'll
I am at a loss as to why this error shows up - especially since I have
glib-2.2.3 installed.
Platform is Solaris 5.9; the config.log (pango) is attached. What is a little
confusing is that ATK configured make make install without error.
Any ideas of how I can resolve this issue?
Thx/Sx
28 matches
Mail list logo
