Antonio Campos wrote:
Well, a good idea. The (dreaded :) Motif also has those two modes and
switches them automagically. If you click and release mouse button
on a menu, it is driven by explicit clicks, and if you click and
drag mouse, submenus pop up on pointer rollover. (But still it
Erik,
All that said, there can be asked a simple question: why take Motif as
an example? There are *more* *perfect* GUI styles around, Mackintosh
e.g.. Take after Makintosh!
EM Use the MacOS theme.
Where can I get it?
--
Andrew Klochkov
--
To unsubscribe: mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL
On 25 Nov 1999, Andrew Klochkov wrote:
Erik,
All that said, there can be asked a simple question: why take Motif as
an example? There are *more* *perfect* GUI styles around, Mackintosh
e.g.. Take after Makintosh!
EM Use the MacOS theme.
Where can I get it?
gtk.themes.org
--
John Sullivan wrote:
On the Macintosh (at least), click-to-leave-menu-displayed was merged into the
existing hold-mouse-button-down-to-view-menu behavior in such a way that both
still work nicely and don't get in each other's way. There's no need for a
preference to switch between them. I
Kent Schumacher wrote:
The point about a sub-menu disappearing unless you follow an
exact path with your mouse needs to be addressed. I don't think
this is a matter of taste. I would assume any user would naturally
feel that they could move the mouse pointer directly to a sub-menu
item.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Kent Schumacher wrote:
The point about a sub-menu disappearing unless you follow an
exact path with your mouse needs to be addressed. I don't think
this is a matter of taste. I would assume any user would naturally
feel that they could move the mouse pointer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Kent Schumacher wrote:
The point about a sub-menu disappearing unless you follow an
exact path with your mouse needs to be addressed. I don't think
this is a matter of taste. I would assume any user would naturally
feel that they could move the mouse
make a theme
--
Preben Randhol "Marriage is when you get to keep
[[EMAIL PROTECTED]] your girl and don't have to give
[http://www.pvv.org/~randhol/] her back to her parents." (Eric, 6)
--
To unsubscribe: mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, 18 Nov 1999 13:17:36 +0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There are words in GTK docs:
"GTK is a library for creating graphical user interfaces similar to the
Motif "look and feel"". And it can really be observed that GTK has
inherited some Motif appearance. But, sadly, Motif is not an
Concave border round the default button - it is a way too big. And
maybe it can be drawn in different style?
I never actually notices this, maybe you should have a look at the "pin
cushion" setting on your screen.. hehe
"Triangular" buttons on the ends of scroll bars - they impose the
]]
Sent: Thursday, November 18, 1999 2:36 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [gtk-list] Re: Gtk look and feel
Unix users expect that behaviour, because it's exactly
what every other
major toolkit does (Motif, OpenLook). It's just to be consistent.
Why? That's where Unices
99 2:36 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [gtk-list] Re: Gtk look and feel
Unix users expect that behaviour, because it's exactly
what every other
major toolkit does (Motif, OpenLook). It's just to be
consistent.
Why? That's where Unices are definitely wrong.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Motif's elements simply spoil the picture. It would be better if
| you find some talented artist who can fix this. KDE team, e.g., has
I can't say I find QT (nor KDE) any nicer than Motif to look at though.
--
Preben Randhol "Marriage is when
13 matches
Mail list logo
