Re: [guadec-list] Minutes 2016-02-24

2016-03-25 Thread Benjamin Berg
Oops, this one was a duplicate as it was send out a couple of weeks back. Benjamin On Fr, 2016-03-25 at 18:31 +0100, Benjamin Berg wrote: > Hi, > > Edited minutes are also on. >  * https://wiki.gnome.org/GUADEC/2016/Meetings/20160224 > > Originals: >  * Minutes:

[guadec-list] Minutes 2016-02-24

2016-03-25 Thread Benjamin Berg
Hi, Edited minutes are also on.  * https://wiki.gnome.org/GUADEC/2016/Meetings/20160224 Originals:  * Minutes: http://meetbot.gnome.org/guadec/2016/guadec.2016-02-24-20.20.html  * Minutes (text): http://meetbot.gnome.org/guadec/2016/guadec.2016-02-24-20.20.txt  * Log:

Re: [guadec-list] Minutes 2016-02-24

2016-02-25 Thread Ekaterina Gerasimova
On 25 February 2016 at 13:34, Ekaterina Gerasimova wrote: > On 25 February 2016 at 13:07, Benjamin Berg wrote: >> On Do, 2016-02-25 at 12:47 +0100, Tobias Mueller wrote: >>> Hi. >>> >>> On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 11:18:53AM +0100, Benjamin Berg

Re: [guadec-list] Minutes 2016-02-24

2016-02-25 Thread Ekaterina Gerasimova
On 25 February 2016 at 13:07, Benjamin Berg wrote: > On Do, 2016-02-25 at 12:47 +0100, Tobias Mueller wrote: >> Hi. >> >> On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 11:18:53AM +0100, Benjamin Berg wrote: >> > >> > * AGREED: regcfp will be our software for registration and CfP unless >>

Re: [guadec-list] Minutes 2016-02-24

2016-02-25 Thread Andreas Nilsson
On 2016-02-25 14:12, Alexandre Franke wrote: And the year before. There, proved you wrong. ;-) True. I stand corrected. - Andreas ___ guadec-list mailing list guadec-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/guadec-list

Re: [guadec-list] Minutes 2016-02-24

2016-02-25 Thread Alexandre Franke
On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 2:10 PM, Andreas Nilsson wrote: > There is this GUADEC curse that magically makes us switch registration > systems every year. > Would be kind of cool if we were able to keep the same two years in a row > for once. Hmm. > The regcfp system worked

Re: [guadec-list] Minutes 2016-02-24

2016-02-25 Thread Alexandre Franke
On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 2:07 PM, Benjamin Berg wrote: > I don't want to block a move to something else. However, I don't really > see schedule archives as a big enough reason to move considering we > would need someone to: > * figure everything out (badges, cfp,

Re: [guadec-list] Minutes 2016-02-24

2016-02-25 Thread Andreas Nilsson
On 2016-02-25 14:07, Benjamin Berg wrote: The advantages of regcfp: * Seems to work well for us (i.e. paper team, registration/badges) * People already know the system * We have the author supporting it for us There is this GUADEC curse that magically makes us switch registration

Re: [guadec-list] Minutes 2016-02-24

2016-02-25 Thread Benjamin Berg
On Do, 2016-02-25 at 12:47 +0100, Tobias Mueller wrote: > Hi. > > On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 11:18:53AM +0100, Benjamin Berg wrote: > > > >   * AGREED: regcfp will be our software for registration and CfP unless > > this should be revisited for good reasons next week > As for the CfP system: > Do

Re: [guadec-list] Minutes 2016-02-24

2016-02-25 Thread Tobias Mueller
Hi. On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 11:18:53AM +0100, Benjamin Berg wrote: >   * AGREED: regcfp will be our software for registration and CfP unless > this should be revisited for good reasons next week As for the CfP system: Do we know from the VoCCC how much a frab would make their and our lives

[guadec-list] Minutes 2016-02-24

2016-02-25 Thread Benjamin Berg
Hi, unfortunately we had a couple of core people missing. For anyone interested about the status there is plenty of information in the minutes :) Thanks to Kat for cleaning up the minutes and putting them on the wiki:   https://wiki.gnome.org/GUADEC/2016/Meetings/20160224 Benjamin == People