-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Resurrecting this thread to mention an idea that came to me last
night. I don't have time to try it out at the moment, but it might
allow us to create a Wi-Fi Direct connection between two devices
without any user interaction:
* Alice creates a
On Tue, Nov 4, 2014, at 10:28 AM, Michael Rogers wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Resurrecting this thread to mention an idea that came to me last
night. I don't have time to try it out at the moment, but it might
allow us to create a Wi-Fi Direct connection between
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
I wonder if we could capture the discovery frames with airodump-ng and
explore them with wireshark...
Cheers,
Michael
On 09/10/14 18:43, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
If there is DNS communication, that means there is IP communication
already
On Thu, Oct 9, 2014, at 01:43 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
If there is DNS communication, that means there is IP communication
already
setup. Or is there some kind of special DNS for wifi direct? If there
is IP,
then I think you'll get a lot more efficient data transfer using IP
Hello,
My understanding is that this is special Wi-Fi Direct DNS, not general IP
traffic, which would basically imply some equivalent to ad-hoc Wi-Fi. It
would be great if the latter were true, but I don't believe it is.
Paul.
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 4:13 AM, Hans-Christoph Steiner
On Wed, Oct 8, 2014, at 06:48 AM, Paul Gardner-Stephen wrote:
Hello All,
I have been following the discussion about FireChat, Gilgamesh and the
really interesting ideas in it for using bluetooth device names to
transfer
data.
As someone pointed out, this transport could be fairly
On Wed, Oct 8, 2014, at 08:21 AM, Paul Gardner-Stephen wrote:
Hello Nathan,
Root would not be required to use this transport.
In other words: adding the bluetooth device name transport would allow
most
stock Android phones to mesh, albeit at low data rates (~1KB/minute), and
with
Hey Paul,
Good to see your comments here, since you're deep in the mesh. I wanted to
get your thoughts on a question: since this bluetooth name hack is a
broadcast-only transport, I fear it will also have the same limitations as all
other mesh transports with rely on some kind of broadcast
On Wed, Oct 8, 2014, at 09:07 AM, Paul Gardner-Stephen wrote:
Hello,
On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 10:57 PM, Nathan of Guardian
[1]nat...@guardianproject.info wrote:
On Wed, Oct 8, 2014, at 08:21 AM, Paul Gardner-Stephen
wrote:
Hello Nathan,
Root would not be required to use this
