Mark Murphy:
> On Fri, Mar 18, 2016, at 06:52, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>> Also, to use the K-9 technique that does not use reflection,
>> TlsOnlySocketFactory will need to be a subclass of
>> SSLCertificateSocketFactory rather than SSLSocketFactory. I think
>> that's probably the best
Mark Murphy:
> On Wed, Mar 2, 2016, at 16:31, cketti wrote:
>> On 24.02.2016 21:12, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>>> Anyone have any pointers? NetCipher should really fully support SNI.
>>
>> This might help: https://github.com/k9mail/k-9/pull/718
>
> HttpClient has the same SNI problem, even
On Fri, Mar 18, 2016, at 06:52, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
> Also, to use the K-9 technique that does not use reflection,
> TlsOnlySocketFactory will need to be a subclass of
> SSLCertificateSocketFactory rather than SSLSocketFactory. I think
> that's probably the best approach.
Agreed. I
On Wed, Mar 2, 2016, at 16:31, cketti wrote:
> On 24.02.2016 21:12, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
> > Anyone have any pointers? NetCipher should really fully support SNI.
>
> This might help: https://github.com/k9mail/k-9/pull/718
HttpClient has the same SNI problem, even without NetCipher.
On 24.02.2016 21:12, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
> Anyone have any pointers? NetCipher should really fully support SNI.
This might help: https://github.com/k9mail/k-9/pull/718
___
List info: https://lists.mayfirst.org/mailman/listinfo/guardian-dev
To
