Michael Rogers:
> On 22/03/17 12:54, Nathan of Guardian wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 22, 2017, at 08:23 AM, Michael Rogers wrote:
>>> Following up on an old thread to let you know that unfortunately the
>>> approach we found for getting OkHttp to use a SOCKS proxy isn't safe. In
>>> some cases OkHttp
On 22/03/17 12:54, Nathan of Guardian wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 22, 2017, at 08:23 AM, Michael Rogers wrote:
>> Following up on an old thread to let you know that unfortunately the
>> approach we found for getting OkHttp to use a SOCKS proxy isn't safe. In
>> some cases OkHttp will try to resolve
On 06/09/16 10:48, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>
> The Briar folks are working on getting HTTP connections on Android to go
> through Tor via SOCKS. They used a custom SocketFactory and Socket
> subclasses, with their own SOCKS handling.
>
>
Nathan of Guardian:
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 22, 2016, at 03:52 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>> I didn't find a solid reference yet, but this test for me confirms that
>> at least in terms of HttpURLConnection on android-22, SOCKS proxies do
>> not work:
>>
>> URL url = new
Hans-Christoph Steiner:
>
>
> Michael Rogers:
>> On 06/09/16 11:54, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>>> Have you run tests yet of HTTPS verification using your technique? You
>>> can take code from the NetCipher tests if you want.
>>
>> Thanks, that's a good idea. We've tried it with a few
Michael Rogers:
> On 06/09/16 11:54, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>> Have you run tests yet of HTTPS verification using your technique? You
>> can take code from the NetCipher tests if you want.
>
> Thanks, that's a good idea. We've tried it with a few HTTPS sites but
> haven't done any
Mark Murphy:
> On Tue, Sep 6, 2016, at 05:48, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>> Could we use this approach in NetCipher?
>
> IIRC, NetCipher has SOCKS support. The exception is with OkHttpClient,
> and that's because Square is not explicitly supporting SOCKS with
> OkHttp3:
>
>
On 06/09/16 11:54, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
> Have you run tests yet of HTTPS verification using your technique? You
> can take code from the NetCipher tests if you want.
Thanks, that's a good idea. We've tried it with a few HTTPS sites but
haven't done any testing in depth.
> I don't
On Tue, Sep 6, 2016, at 05:48, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
> Could we use this approach in NetCipher?
IIRC, NetCipher has SOCKS support. The exception is with OkHttpClient,
and that's because Square is not explicitly supporting SOCKS with
OkHttp3:
https://github.com/square/okhttp/issues/2315
On 06/09/16 10:48, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
> Could we use this approach in NetCipher? I think Torsten that said this
> approach requires android-14 at least, but we could just use HTTP
> proxies to support older platforms.
As far as I know this should work on any version of Android, but
10 matches
Mail list logo
