@costales (costales): It might be important to note that my Ubuntu is
used as a VM under Windows 7/VirtualBox 4.2.14
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Gufw
Developers, which is subscribed to gui-ufw in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1194791
Title:
gufw
Invalid status? How convenient!
I've noticed a current trend in the software industry and open-source
community: denying a bug to avoid to have to solve it as long as only a
few users are affected by it. Nowadays, quantity surpasses quality by
far in people's mind.
I guess no one even tried to re
@costales: Here's what you've requested:
actionmystique@ACER-Aspire:~$ sudo gnome-control-center
[sudo] password for actionmystique:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/share/gufw/gufw/gufw.py", line 20, in
from controller import Controller
File "/usr/share/gufw/gufw/control
I've just uninstalled and installed gufw as suggested. And my system is up to
date.
Nothing has changed after running gufw:
actionmystique@ACER-Aspire:~$ sudo gnome-control-center
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/share/gufw/gufw/gufw.py", line 20, in
from controller import
Extracts from "/usr/share/gufw/gufw/model/Firewall.py"
# Gufw 13.04.0 - http://gufw.org
# Copyright (C) 2008-2011 Marcos Alvarez Costales
https://launchpad.net/~costales
...
import commands
import time
import os
import dbus
So dbus is not used anymore?
--
You received this bug notification b
No, No, No
Never installed 13.10 from the sources.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Gufw
Developers, which is subscribed to gui-ufw in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1194791
Title:
gufw does not start from System Settings -> Firewall Configuration
Sta
If I remove the dbus call, another error pops up:
actionmystique@ACER-Aspire:/usr/share/gufw/gufw/model$ sudo
gnome-control-center
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/share/gufw/gufw/gufw.py", line 21, in
from view.guiGufw import GuiGufw
File "/usr/share/gufw/gufw/view/guiGufw
1. same
2. it should work as root as well.
without it:
actionmystique@ACER-Aspire:/$ gnome-control-center
(gnome-control-center:3913): IBUS-WARNING **: The owner of
/home/actionmystique/.config/ibus/bus is not actionmystique!
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/share/gufw/gufw/gufw
"sudo update-python-modules -f" did NOT change anything.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Gufw
Developers, which is subscribed to gui-ufw in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1194791
Title:
gufw does not start from System Settings -> Firewall Configuratio
a "sudo apt-get dist-upgrade" does not change anything.
I appreciate the time and effort you've put into trying to solve this case.
I feel it won't be solved.
You said that there's no "import dbus" in the 13.10 release. I'll wait for
Ubuntu 13.10 then.
--
You received this bug notification beca
After having installed your 13.10 gufw package and resolved a dependency
issue (python-netifaces is now installed), I have this error after
having launched "sudo gnome-control-center/gufw":
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/share/gufw/gufw/gufw.py", line 19, in
from controller
I begin to understand where the problem lies.
I use python ***3.3*** (latest release) and there's no such thing as
"dist-packages" inside "/usr/lib/python3.3/"
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Gufw
Developers, which is subscribed to gui-ufw in Ubuntu.
https://bug
But when I use the command "python -v", all the paths are within
usr/local/lib/python2.7/ and there's no other packages than GNS3 inside
dist-packages
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Gufw
Developers, which is subscribed to gui-ufw in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpa
Here are the results:
>>> import sys
>>> sys.path
['', '/usr/local/lib/python27.zip', '/usr/local/lib/python2.7',
'/usr/local/lib/python2.7/plat-linux2', '/usr/local/lib/python2.7/lib-tk',
'/usr/local/lib/python2.7/lib-old', '/usr/local/lib/python2.7/lib-dynload',
'/usr/local/lib/python2.7/site
>>> import sys
>>> sys.path.append('/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages')
>>> import dbus
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "", line 1, in
File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/dbus/__init__.py", line 82, in
import dbus.types as types
File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/dbus/type
Your gufw is assuming particular python version and paths, and correct behavior
from other apps.
I don't know anything about python, but your app should not depend on these.
Why don't you:
- test python version installed on the system prior to launch
- include the expected paths of the packages t
Here's the content of my PATH variable:
/usr/lib/lightdm/lightdm:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/games:/usr/local/games:/home/actionmystique/bin:/usr/local/java/jre1.7.0_25/bin
I'm not an Ubuntu expert, so I cannot understand the meaning of your
"export PATH=$(ech
I was finally able to launch gufw !!! :)
-
All I did was to simply switch the order of usr/local/bin and usr/bin paths
within $PATH and reload:
-
Public bug reported:
Environment: Up-to-date Ubuntu 14.04 Desktop - Gufw 14.04.2 LTS
I'm trying to enter a simple advanced rule to allow NFS traffic in (all other
traffic is denied in).
The "add" button has no effect: no rule is added, no error message!
See attached screenshot for all details.
A quick look at the gufw.log shows:
"Error running: ufw insert 5 allow in proto tcp from 192.168.1.163 port 1:1023
to 192.168.1.194 port 111,2049 > ERROR: Invalid position '5'"
There are 4 rules at the first positions.
If I delete all other rules and insert the NFS rule at position "0", it
is i
Public bug reported:
When we try to scroll down the "Listening Report" box, it always goes
back to the first line even though we"re looking at the last lines of
the report. It seems to be tied to the refresh timer. Every time the box
is refreshed, the current displayed line is put back to the firs
Hi, I"m fine and thanks for your reply.
Regarding the refresh interval value: Gufw release 14.04.2 LTS.
Regarding the port numbers, how about adding one or two columns in the
listening report table with the services names and/or description from the
official "Service Name and Transport Protoco
Actually, the paths are:
/usr/share/gufw/gufw/view/gufw.py
/usr/share/gufw/gufw/gufw.py
and the two files are very different
After adding the printf, and starting gufw, the message is generated
regularly in the window.
/etc/services is only a small part of the file I was talking about.
--
I've just found a workaround for the first issue: if we select a line
while scrolling down, the refresh does not scroll back to the first line
of the report.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Gufw
Developers, which is subscribed to Gufw.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/
So my suggestion to solve this slight issue is to select the first current line
of the report while the user scrolls down.
The next refresh won't change anything regarding the current displayed lines.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Gufw
Developers, which is sub
About the unkown ports: how do I know which application(s) open(s) a
particular UDP/TCP port?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Gufw
Developers, which is subscribed to Gufw.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1352777
Title:
Listening Report Issues
Status in Gufw:
> Then, the refresh Listening Report is working right :) Isn't it?
I never siad it was not wortking; I said that changing the refresh
interval needed a gufw restart to be taken into account.
> About the unkown ports: how do I know which application(s) open(s) a
> particular UDP/TCP port?
Sorry,
Also, some open ports are missing in the listening report: if I do
"netstat -tulpn", I collect 5 more ports...
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Gufw
Developers, which is subscribed to Gufw.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1352777
Title:
Listening Report Issues
The hidden ports are within the dynamic ports zone (49152-65535) and below, in
some unassigned portions (above ~ 3).
They mutate when I try to block them, several times a day and on system restart.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Gufw
Developers, which is su
I've solved the "hidden ports" mystery: they are used by NFS deamon
(nfs-kernel-server). More details on this thread:
http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=2238950&p=13102309#post13102309
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Gufw
Developers, which is subscribed to
Public bug reported:
Environment: Ubuntu 14.10 - Gufw 14.10.1
--
The configuration is basic:
- Incoming: Deny
- Outgoing: Allow
- Routing: Allow
Now, suppose you need to allow internal communication, for example all
incoming UDP/TCP traffic from a VirtualBox VM on vboxnet0 sitti
I'm fine, thanks, how are you?
You're right, but it does not change anything if I set the right subnet;
the problem actually comes from the fact that I've specified vboxnet0
after the ">" sign, instead of specifying "not forward": my mistake.
However, you cannot add a unique rule for both protoco
The comment about the ">" interface is not tied to the "port range"
gliitch.
I confirm that this issue/limitation comes from ufw, not from gufw;
sorry about that.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Gufw
Developers, which is subscribed to Gufw.
https://bugs.launchpa
Public bug reported:
Hello Marcos,
The rules used to be listed without any issue.
I don't know what have changed since.
The correct profile is loaded from /etc/gufw/app_profiles .
The profile text file contains all the rules.
Gufw first complained that the profile permissions needed to be 600. I
** Description changed:
- Hello Marcos,
The rules used to be listed without any issue.
- I don't know what have changed since.
+ I don't know what have changed since to explain this strange & suspicious
behavior.
The correct profile is loaded from /etc/gufw/app_profiles .
The profile text f
No & no
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Gufw
Developers, which is subscribed to Gufw.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1571701
Title:
The rules have disappeared from the Rules tab
Status in Gufw:
New
Bug description:
The rules used to be listed without an
I completely removed iptables, ufw & gufw and reinstalled them.
At the beginning, there is:
iptables -S
-P INPUT ACCEPT
-P FORWARD ACCEPT
-P OUTPUT ACCEPT
Then, I start Gufw, my default profile ("root-profile") is loaded, but Gufw is
disabled, which is weird.
I enable it, make sure that incoming
I have to add that this extra check on the ownership of /etc has lead to
completely open my server for quite some time, with the rule "-P INPUT ACCEPT"
set for a long time: the "extra security feature" has the exact opposite
effect.
On top of that, only /etc was changed in my situation: none of
Public bug reported:
Hello,
I've just installed iptables-persistent package so that my user-defined
iptables rules are reloaded at each reboot.
Some rules cannot be defined with Gufw/ufw, such as for instance "sudo iptables
-I OUTPUT -m geoip --dst-cc -j ACCEPT" which uses
Xtables-addons.
In
** Description changed:
Hello,
I've just installed iptables-persistent package so that my user-defined
iptables rules are reloaded at each reboot.
- Some rules cannot be defined with Gufw/ufw, such as for instance "sudo
iptables -I OUTPUT -m geoip --dst-cc -j ACCEPT" which uses
Xtab
*** This bug is a security vulnerability ***
Private security bug reported:
4.4.0-21-generic #37-Ubuntu SMP Mon Apr 18 18:33:37 UTC 2016 x86_64 GNU/Linux
Gufw 16.04.1
/etc owned by root
All rules previously defined within Gufw are still available:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B6XxNd5c3zV_SEI
A workaround is to perform the following:
Edit one rule -> change the interface > Apply -> Edit the same rule -> Change
the interface back to the original one -> Apply
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Gufw
Developers, which is subscribed to Gufw.
https://bugs.lau
Public bug reported:
Ubuntu Gnome 16.04 4.4.0-22
Gufw 16.04
Inverted colors
** Affects: gui-ufw
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Gufw
Developers, which is subscribed to Gufw.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/158773
Public bug reported:
Ubuntu 16.04 4.4.0-38
Gufw 16.04.1
If I try to define a port range using a : as delimiter as explained by the help
message which appears when hovering the mouse over the port field, it is
impossible to save the rule: the add button remains greyed out:
https://drive.google.
44 matches
Mail list logo
