Andy Wingo wi...@pobox.com writes:
What if instead we implemented closure serialization somehow? Then we
would handle procedural macros too, and bound-identifiers would still be
sufficient.
Maybe that idea is a little too crazy.
Are we still talking about Scheme? The language with
Mark H Weaver m...@netris.org writes:
(current-module) should be relevant only at the beginning of
macro-expansion: before any program transformations are performed,
(current-module) is baked into every symbol of the top-level form.
(psyntax actually does this lazily, but the effect is the
This patch makes our gensyms universally-unique. Comments welcome.
Mark
From 18616afc6a3d5aca48da2e0819d08d7ff98de214 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mark H Weaver m...@netris.org
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2012 08:15:10 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] Universally-unique gensyms
* libguile/symbols.c
Hi Mark,
Excellent!
On Tue 17 Jan 2012 14:27, Mark H Weaver m...@netris.org writes:
This patch makes our gensyms universally-unique. Comments welcome.
I think the lazy initialization needs to happen within the lock. Also
it would be nice to factor out the initialization of the random seed
On Tue 17 Jan 2012 14:57, Andy Wingo wi...@pobox.com writes:
I think the lazy initialization needs to happen within the lock. Also
it would be nice to factor out the initialization of the random seed
would be a nice helper to have in random.[ch].
Sigh, mind racing ahead of the fingers:
Yes!
see attachement!
/Stefan
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 12:30 AM, Andy Wingo wi...@pobox.com wrote:
On Mon 16 Jan 2012 22:56, Stefan Israelsson Tampe stefan.ita...@gmail.com
writes:
As you see, it's just wild west to get the racket code working.
:)
Can you give a stripped-down test case
David Kastrup d...@gnu.org writes:
Mark H Weaver m...@netris.org writes:
(current-module) should be relevant only at the beginning of
macro-expansion: before any program transformations are performed,
(current-module) is baked into every symbol of the top-level form.
(psyntax actually does
From: Andy Wingo wi...@pobox.com
If I could vote for one thing to focus on in 2012, for the broader Guile
community, I'd pick two things ;-) I'd pick Guile in Emacs, first of
all. We have the hack power, the time is right, and we just need to
focus on the task. By the end of the year we
I feel like I shouldn't get into this discussion for my huge lack of
Guile (and Scheme in general) knowledge. But I will do in any case
:-).
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 2:37 PM, Mike Gran spk...@yahoo.com wrote:
heresy
[snip]
I know that you want to believe that if your tech is good enough,
people
