Hello,
This is coming late in the discussion, but I'd like to suggest a somewhat
different approach. I hope this is helpful.
It seems to me that in the end, the module-lookup system may need to be
more complex than having regular and suffix lookup paths. For instance, one
of the big concerns here
Mark H Weaver skribis:
>> However, I can live with that, but maybe we can have it both
>> ways:
>>
>> - Add the _SUFFIX environment variables, making it clear in the docs
>> that they are supported only from Guile 2.0.7 onward.
>
> Yes, I agree this is a good idea.
But then, what would happen
Sjoerd van Leent Privé writes:
> Hi Stefan,
>
> Just my idea about an assembler in Scheme. Sounds interesting. If it's
> done properly, it can be very promising to use scheme itself to
> directly emit machine instructions. This would also be interesting for
> meta compilation in the future (think
Hi Andreas,
Andreas Rottmann writes:
> l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
>
>> I pretty much like Mark’s suggestion of using ‘...’ as a special marker,
>> even though that’s a valid file name.
>>
> Well, there's a workaround -- specifying "./..." as an "escape sequence"
> for "..." if you re
Hi Andreas,
Andreas Rottmann skribis:
> l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
[...]
>> I pretty much like Mark’s suggestion of using ‘...’ as a special marker,
>> even though that’s a valid file name.
>>
> Well, there's a workaround -- specifying "./..." as an "escape sequence"
> for "..." if
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> Hi!
>
> Sorry for the delay.
>
> Andreas Rottmann skribis:
>
>> Ian Price writes:
>
> [...]
>
>>> Andreas Rottmann suggested something similar in February[1].
>>>
>> I've attached a patch implementing that suggestion, FWIW.
>>
>>> I don't have any concret
Hello,
Regarding the assembler, if I were to actually hack something ;-), I’d
choose Sassy [0], along with Industria’s disassemblers [1].
Ludo’.
[0] http://sassy.sourceforge.net/
[1] http://weinholt.se/industria/
Hi,
Yes this is pre-work and what i'm doing is an investigation trying out
things. bare that in mind :-)
For the assembler it can be really good to support one that comes with
guile so I do not find this
work as a research work but as a service work to propose components that
can be included in g
Before anyone spends any more time on this, I want to make it clear that
although I very much appreciate Stefan's pioneering spirit, and some of
his ideas are likely to be incorporated, Stefan's work on native
compilation is an independent project of his, and is unlikely to be
merged into the offic
Arg, I prematurely send that mail, well here is the continuation
4. I prefere to have an evironment like
(assemble target
(inst jmp label:)
(inst mov b a)
label:
(inst mov b c)
This makes the labels stand out and makes for a nice read of the assembler.
You can see how we
Hi Sjoerd,
1. I (mov dst src), this is what's used in the rtl vm code in C and I would
like to keep a match between
the two
2. I wouldl like to have prefix for instruction to mark those out like
(inst mov dst src)
3. It would be nice to have a default size of the architecture e.g.
(inst
Hi Stefan,
Just my idea about an assembler in Scheme. Sounds interesting. If it's
done properly, it can be very promising to use scheme itself to directly
emit machine instructions. This would also be interesting for meta
compilation in the future (think of aiding GCC).
So you are thinking a
12 matches
Mail list logo
