Thien-Thi Nguyen t...@gnuvola.org skribis:
Anyway, i hope Guile grows a ‘sendfile-some’ (or whatever) so that i can
adapt my programs to use it instead of the ttn-do ‘sendfile’:
I’m open to the idea. To get a better understanding, do you have
examples of real applications where it makes a
() l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)
() Wed, 17 Apr 2013 14:52:40 +0200
concrete cases of recurring short writes?
The original application was ttn-do serve-debiso, which configures
ttn-do sizzweb to serve debian ISOs (or rather, the various component
.deb files and metadata that apt-get requests
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 10:00:55PM -0400, Mark H Weaver wrote:
Unfortunately, this is rarely possible in a language like Scheme, where
calls to procedures bound by mutable top-level variables are frequent.
We cannot fix this without making most commonly-used top-level bindings
immutable. Last
Thien-Thi Nguyen t...@gnuvola.org skribis:
The original application was ttn-do serve-debiso, which configures
ttn-do sizzweb to serve debian ISOs (or rather, the various component
.deb files and metadata that apt-get requests from the loopback-mounted
ISO) over the home network.
Hi Chris,
Chris K. Jester-Young cky...@gmail.com writes:
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 10:00:55PM -0400, Mark H Weaver wrote:
Unfortunately, this is rarely possible in a language like Scheme, where
calls to procedures bound by mutable top-level variables are frequent.
We cannot fix this without
Chris K. Jester-Young cky...@gmail.com writes:
With a proper module system, I don't see why top-level bindings should
be mutable. That would make even things like direct inlining of cons or
+ somewhat harder than it needs to be. The way I understand it, the
definition of (@ (guile) cons) or
Ian Price ianpric...@googlemail.com writes:
The current issues with lua vs master are as follows
1) application has been renamed to call on master
2) sequence has been replaced with seq which is not quite a drop-in
3) while was being compiled into something with improper scoping.
I have
