I needed this in OS X w/ MacPorts where GNU libtoolize is called glibtoolize.
This or a version of this is probably useful in other situations.
Thanks,
Daniel
o.patch
Description: Binary data
On Sun, Oct 05, 2014 at 12:11:00PM -0400, Ian Grant wrote:
> > As has been stated---your concerns are substantiated and understood,
>
> I wasn't aware that my concerns _have_ been substantiated. How? I am
> not sure they have been understood, either.
They were substantiated long ago by the very r
Jan Nieuwenhuizen writes:
Changes in v3:
* fix source-line/user-source-line confusion in srfi-64
* better conforming commit message
>From 2776b305b1b81ccebbb94ae4ef83ae83996a5253 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jan Nieuwenhuizen
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2014 18:37:44 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Add GNU-
On Sun, Oct 5, 2014 at 1:42 PM, Ian Grant wrote:
> [we] will be able to implement a C compiler in Microsoft Word BASIC, or in
> COBOL, and that will be capable of compiling GCC, if we had a year or
> so to wait while it does it ...
This is not true. Word BASIC or COBOL could easily write out an
e
Taylan wrote:
> In your PDF analogy, the solution is to write a spurious
> amount of PDF implementations. Or for C, to implement
> a spurious amount of C compilers. That is impractical
> because C is complex.
It's not as complex as you might think. In the space of a couple of
months, I wrote wha
On Sun, Oct 5, 2014 at 11:15 AM, Nala Ginrut wrote:
>
> Alright, I changed a system and try it again with evince successfully.
> Anyway, I did't find any maths or special symbols in it, so it could be
> published on your blog as plain text. But you may insist on the opinion of
> PDF.
There is ano
On Sun, Oct 5, 2014 at 2:58 AM, Mike Gerwitz wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 04, 2014 at 09:35:09PM -0400, Ian Grant wrote:
>> Well, if I do succeed in distributing malware, it will be a good
>> demonstration of what I have been arguing for months now, which is
>> that your "core infrastructure" is _very,_ _
On Sun, Oct 5, 2014 at 10:14 PM, Ian Grant
wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 5, 2014 at 1:39 AM, Nala Ginrut wrote:
> >
> > The real problem here, is the provided PDF can't be opened normally.
> That's
> > bad, for your idea. It's your mistake, not others.
>
> Then tell me the name, the sha512sum of the file
On Sun, Oct 5, 2014 at 1:39 AM, Nala Ginrut wrote:
>
> The real problem here, is the provided PDF can't be opened normally. That's
> bad, for your idea. It's your mistake, not others.
Then tell me the name, the sha512sum of the file, the URL from which
you downloaded it and the size of the file a
On 3 October 2014 22:56, Taylan Ulrich Bayirli/Kammer <
taylanbayi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> William ML Leslie writes:
>
> > Oh, interesting point. Maybe we should define PDF as an abstract
> > semantics that we can convert into a wide range of equivalent document
> > layout languages? If the attac
Ludovic Courtès writes:
Hi,
>>> I don’t think this is needed. Lexers are expected to use
>>> ‘make-lexical-token’ and ‘make-source-location’ from (system base lalr)
>>> to preserve source location information.
>> I hope you're right...and that's what I tried, but I didn't get it
>> working. Po
Hi,
I found that when code under test throws an exception, it is hidden from
the user. The test suite niftily uses exceptions for message passing, I
wonder if this is wise (in-band signaling?).
Anyway, if an unexpected exception occurs I find it helpful to see the
backtrace. See attached patch.
Jan Nieuwenhuizen writes:
Hi,
New version adds
* test-suite/tests/srfi-64.test (guile-test-runner): Update callers.
Thanks to Mark Weaver, who also suggested this function might better be
moved to test-suite/lib.scm.
Greetings,
Jan
PS: please have a look at my GUD and Guile-Gnome patc
13 matches
Mail list logo