Hi,
Neil Jerram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I think we should we wait until there's a big enough mass of Guile
> stuff out there that the current organization becomes a problem. When
> we have a real problem to solve, we'll probably have a better idea
> about the solution.
Well, there is no r
Neil Jerram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> It seems people aren't that bothered. :-)
Oh, well, the obscurity of ice-9 has the advantage that nobody will
use it by accident and get name clashes :-).
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
>
> Are people fond of `ice-9'? :-)
It's pretty sill
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> Actually, it might be time for a more rational name space... ;-)
>
> Keisuke (at least) had come up with the idea of a `system' module
> directory. So you would put the debugging material under `(system
> debugging)' rather than adding yet another th
Hi,
Neil Jerram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
>
>> Neil Jerram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>>> 1. Scheme code
>>>
>>> By default I'd add these under (ice-9) - but perhaps we should
>>> consider something else? Please let me know if you have ideas.
>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> Neil Jerram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> 1. Scheme code
>>
>> By default I'd add these under (ice-9) - but perhaps we should
>> consider something else? Please let me know if you have ideas.
>
> Maybe you could create a sub-directory, like `(ice-9
Hi Neil,
Neil Jerram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 1. Scheme code
>
> The Scheme files fall into two categories: those which implement new
> debugging infrastructure (steps.scm, trace.scm, traps.scm, trc.scm,
> breakpoints.scm) and those which implement the Emacs interface
> (gds-client.scm, gds-
