Hello,
What tends to happen is that people that want to do this consider
themselves Scheme programmers, first and foremost, and who do not
identify themselves with one Scheme system; so they release their code
on their own site, with info on using it with various systems, and send
mails to
() Noah Lavine noah.b.lav...@gmail.com
() Sat, 29 Jan 2011 16:23:39 -0500
a lot less coordination among Schemes
right now than there should be
Scheme is a fun platform for experimentation,
which is sometimes at odds w/ coordination.
Personally, i wouldn't sweat it overmuch.
On Sat 29 Jan 2011 23:54, Hans Aberg haber...@telia.com writes:
On 29 Jan 2011, at 21:53, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
I think there should be a mailing list for people who implement
Schemes, to sort of coordinate our non-standard features. ...
I think comp.lang.scheme is already a good place for
Hi!
Andy Wingo wi...@pobox.com writes:
On Sat 29 Jan 2011 23:54, Hans Aberg haber...@telia.com writes:
On 29 Jan 2011, at 21:53, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
I think there should be a mailing list for people who implement
Schemes, to sort of coordinate our non-standard features. ...
I think
Hi Noah,
I think several Schemes already have a dynamic FFI with a C parser.
Bigloo has one (info (bigloo) Automatic extern clauses generation),
and it’s GPL’d code, which we could reuse. Larceny has something too.
Thanks,
Ludo’.
Hello,
I think several Schemes already have a dynamic FFI with a C parser.
Bigloo has one (info (bigloo) Automatic extern clauses generation),
and it’s GPL’d code, which we could reuse. Larceny has something too.
Oh, great. Can Guile reuse GPL'd code, though, since it is LGPL? I see
that
Hi,
I think several Schemes already have a dynamic FFI with a C parser.
Bigloo has one (info (bigloo) Automatic extern clauses generation),
and it’s GPL’d code, which we could reuse. Larceny has something too.
Oh, great. Can Guile reuse GPL'd code, though, since it is LGPL?
We could have
Hi Noah,
On Sun 30 Jan 2011 17:08, Noah Lavine noah.b.lav...@gmail.com writes:
My question is, what should I do to let other Scheme variants know
this is happening and get them involved?
C.L.S, currently. It could be that there is a need for another forum,
but I don't know.
What tends to
Hi Noah,
Noah Lavine noah.b.lav...@gmail.com writes:
I think there should be a mailing list for people who implement
Schemes, to sort of coordinate our non-standard features. For
instance, you could email the list and say hey, Guile is thinking of
adding a unicode library with this
Hello,
I think comp.lang.scheme is already a good place for this. You quickly
get feedback and many implementors seem to participate in it.
Oh, great. I didn't know about that.
Although I must say, it seems like there is a lot less coordination
among Schemes right now than there should be.
On 29 Jan 2011, at 21:53, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
I think there should be a mailing list for people who implement
Schemes, to sort of coordinate our non-standard features. ...
I think comp.lang.scheme is already a good place for this. You
quickly
get feedback and many implementors seem to
Hello all,
This is unusual as it is not really a Guile-specific message, but I
was reading recently about the r7rs process and then about SRFIs, and
I had an idea.
I think there should be a mailing list for people who implement
Schemes, to sort of coordinate our non-standard features. For
12 matches
Mail list logo
