Hi,
with both fibers server and (web server) there is a split between IPv4
and IPv6:
IPv4:
(fibers:run-server handler-with-path #:family AF_INET #:port port #:addr
INADDR_ANY)
(run-server handler-with-path 'http `(#:host "localhost" #:family ,AF_INET
#:addr ,INADDR_ANY #:port
Thank you for taking a look Maxime. I have accidentally replied to just
you and not the whole list, so there might be a duplicate email.
> How about including the tests
> (https://github.com/scheme-requests-for-implementation/srfi-214/blob/master/implementation/tests.scm)
> as well?
>
> Guile
On Wed, 19 Jan 2022 13:07:33 +
Chris Vine wrote:
[snip]
> As I understand it, with linux IPv6 sockets are dual stack capable, and
> in earlier kernel versions this was be enabled by default. I believe
> with current versions that is no longer the case, and that you have to
> specifically
Maxime Devos writes:
> Maybe the IPV6_V6ONLY (see the ipv6(7) man page) is relevant here.
> Alternatively, you could run two servers in parallel: one bound to an
> IPv4 address and another bound to an IPv6 address.
My feeling is that IPV6_ONLY is best avoided, for portability, and
because
> If no copyright assignment has happend, then the copyright still
> belongs to the author
> -- from the Git repository's LICENSE: Copyright © Adam Nelson (2020)).
> While possibly you might have made some small changes to flexvectors,
> it seems that most code is preserved, so at most a ‘© FSF’
Vijay Marupudi schreef op wo 19-01-2022 om 10:44 [-0500]:
> > If no copyright assignment has happend, then the copyright still
> > belongs to the author
> > -- from the Git repository's LICENSE: Copyright © Adam Nelson
> > (2020)).
> > While possibly you might have made some small changes to
> >
On Wed, 19 Jan 2022 08:57:51 +0100
"Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide" wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> with both fibers server and (web server) there is a split between IPv4
> and IPv6:
>
> IPv4:
>
> (fibers:run-server handler-with-path #:family AF_INET #:port port #:addr
> INADDR_ANY)
>
> (run-server
On Wed, 19 Jan 2022 13:44:13 +
Chris Vine wrote:
> By the way I did use dual stack some years ago, and I cannot now
> remember all the details, but I think I may have had to bind on
> in6addr_any (which in dual stack would cover INADDR_ANY) or on ::
Vijay Marupudi schreef op wo 19-01-2022 om 08:51 [-0500]:
> > however, the README says ‘by Adam Nelson’. Did you reach some kind
> > of
> > agreement with Adam Nelson about copyright assignment? And since
> > SRFIs
> > are licensed under Expat (not 100% sure), wouldn't this need to be
> > the
>
Chris Vine writes:
> On Wed, 19 Jan 2022 13:44:13 +
> Chris Vine wrote:
>> On Wed, 19 Jan 2022 13:07:33 +
>> Chris Vine wrote:
>> [snip]
>> > As I understand it, with linux IPv6 sockets are dual stack capable, and
>> > in earlier kernel versions this was be enabled by default. I
On Wed, 19 Jan 2022 13:44:13 +
Chris Vine wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Jan 2022 13:07:33 +
> Chris Vine wrote:
> [snip]
> > As I understand it, with linux IPv6 sockets are dual stack capable, and
> > in earlier kernel versions this was be enabled by default. I believe
> > with current versions
Greg Troxel writes:
> [[PGP Signed Part:Signature made by expired key 1FDA7AE8098ED60E Gregory D.
> Troxel (low security, at work) ]]
>
> Maxime Devos writes:
>
>> Maybe the IPV6_V6ONLY (see the ipv6(7) man page) is relevant here.
>> Alternatively, you could run two servers in parallel: one
Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide schreef op wo 19-01-2022 om 08:57 [+0100]:
> Hi,
>
>
> with both fibers server and (web server) there is a split between IPv4
> and IPv6:
>
>
> IPv4:
>
> (fibers:run-server handler-with-path #:family AF_INET #:port port #:addr
> INADDR_ANY)
>
> (run-server
Vijay Marupudi schreef op di 18-01-2022 om 21:34 [-0500]:
> Hello,
>
> I have attached to this email a patch to add support for srfi-214,
> flexvectors.
>
> I have made as few changes to the code from the sample implementation.
>
> If this is accepted, I can work on adding to the documentation.
14 matches
Mail list logo