Hello!
Your insights in reverse:
On Sat 21 Feb 2009 03:52, Andreas Rottmann a.rottm...@gmx.at writes:
it might make sense to provide a pure-Scheme FFI inside Guile core
(perhaps just molding the current G-Wrap runtime library into shape).
Once you have that, you can create bindings without
Hi,
Mike Gran spk...@yahoo.com writes:
I've been playing with this wide char stuff, and I have a patch that
would move the encoding of characters to UCS-4.
Thanks for the good news!
This is completely useless on its own, because, in this
patch, the internal encoding of strings is still
Hello,
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
The attached patch creates a new type tag, `scm_tc7_gsubr', whereby the
24 MSBs are used to store gsubr arity information as returned by
`SCM_GSUBR_MAKTYPE ()'. This makes cclos useless, which simplifies the
code and reduces the overhead when
Andy Wingo wi...@pobox.com writes:
Hello!
Your insights in reverse:
On Sat 21 Feb 2009 03:52, Andreas Rottmann a.rottm...@gmx.at writes:
it might make sense to provide a pure-Scheme FFI inside Guile core
(perhaps just molding the current G-Wrap runtime library into shape).
Once you have
Hello!
Andy Wingo wi...@pobox.com writes:
On Fri 20 Feb 2009 01:45, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
Do we really need it? Guile `master' doesn't put any autoload in the
global namespace, only in `guile-user-module', thus only affecting the
REPL.
Yeah, dunno. It would be great to
