Re: guile-gnome-0 - guile-1.6.8-6.3 - random crash

() Andy Wingo wi...@pobox.com () Fri, 09 Apr 2010 00:13:10 +0200 () Andy Wingo wi...@pobox.com () Thu, 08 Apr 2010 20:53:17 +0200 what is the right thing to do here? Get it into a project on savannah in git hosting, no? Sorry, i don't understand. What does it

Re: guile-gnome-0 - guile-1.6.8-6.3 - random crash

On Fri 09 Apr 2010 09:08, Thien-Thi Nguyen t...@gnuvola.org writes: () Andy Wingo wi...@pobox.com () Fri, 09 Apr 2010 00:13:10 +0200 () Andy Wingo wi...@pobox.com () Thu, 08 Apr 2010 20:53:17 +0200 what is the right thing to do here? Get it into a project on

modifying pointers

Hi Ludo, You added a change to foreign-set! for %null-pointer. Would it not make sense instead to make foreign pointers of type void unsettable? Andy -- http://wingolog.org/

Re: Guile extensions

Thanks :-) What you can do in scheme is making an actor language contruct with macros. See http://soft.vub.ac.be/~tjdhondt/POOL/HTM.dir/notes.htm I will probably upload this to monkey-mac. Love, tullarisc. 2010/4/9 Andy Wingo wi...@pobox.com Verily shall you walk in the light of the lambda

Re: modifying pointers

Hi, Andy Wingo wi...@pobox.com writes: You added a change to foreign-set! for %null-pointer. Would it not make sense instead to make foreign pointers of type void unsettable? Not necessarily. See the test that was added: --8---cut here---start-8---

Re: modifying pointers

Hi, On Fri 09 Apr 2010 18:30, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes: Andy Wingo wi...@pobox.com writes: You added a change to foreign-set! for %null-pointer. Would it not make sense instead to make foreign pointers of type void unsettable? Not necessarily. See the test that was added:

Re: modifying pointers

Hello, Andy Wingo wi...@pobox.com writes: On Fri 09 Apr 2010 18:30, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes: Andy Wingo wi...@pobox.com writes: You added a change to foreign-set! for %null-pointer. Would it not make sense instead to make foreign pointers of type void unsettable? Not

Re: modifying pointers

Hi! On Fri 09 Apr 2010 21:46, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes: Andy Wingo wi...@pobox.com writes: I'm just wondering if it is valid to create a ((void*) 777) pointer. Under what condition is that useful? [...] It opens the door to all sorts of crazy things. :-) Cool :) FWIW, let's