Coverity scan of Fedora Guile-2.0.2 package

Hello, as a part of Red Hat Coverity scan initiative I have been analysed the Fedora Guile package. Selected issues you can find in addition of this message and I hope that it would be useful for the next improvement of Guile quality. If you are interested in getting the whole scan, please

(define-module (foo) #:import (...)), a la r6rs

Hi, I was hacking on Dorodango today, in a script that happened to have a Guile-style (define-module ...) block, and I was importing pieces of an rnrs library. Then I needed to update the import set to provide what was needed. In the middle of making a keyboard macro to add #:use-module before

Re: (define-module (foo) #:import (...)), a la r6rs

Hi! Andy Wingo wi...@pobox.com skribis: So what do you all think about: (define-module (foo) #:import ((bar) (only (baz) qux foo) ...)) Or even: (define-module (foo) (import (bar) (only (baz) qux foo) ...)) I’d prefer

Re: (define-module (foo) #:import (...)), a la r6rs

From: Andy Wingo wi...@pobox.com Hi, I was hacking on Dorodango today, in a script that happened to have a Guile-style (define-module ...) block, and I was importing pieces of an rnrs library. Then I needed to update the import set to provide what was needed. In the middle of making a

Re: (define-module (foo) #:import (...)), a la r6rs

On Thu, Jul 28 2011, Andy Wingo wrote: Hi, I was hacking on Dorodango today, in a script that happened to have a Guile-style (define-module ...) block, and I was importing pieces of an rnrs library. Then I needed to update the import set to provide what was needed. In the middle of making