David,
From a pragmatic side, wouldn't it be better to just have a marker like
#!curly-infix. The number 105 doesn't say much when reading the code,
which is the whole reason for the existence of curly-infixing.
Also, a file extension might change the folding mode. This could by
something
svanleent:
From a pragmatic side, wouldn't it be better to just have a marker like
#!curly-infix. The number 105 doesn't say much when reading the code,
which is the whole reason for the existence of curly-infixing.
There are advantages either direction. I agree with you on the advantage
Hi,
I found that this optimization can lead to dangerous bugs.
If I put,
(define a #(1))
(define b #(1))
, load the file. Then
(eq? a b)
#t
Is this an optimization we need. I can figure out applications where you do
not want this behavior e.g. I wan't to make distinct objects
and add
Stefan Israelsson Tampe stefan.ita...@gmail.com writes:
Is this an optimization we need. I can figure out applications where you do
not want this behavior e.g. I wan't to make distinct objects
and add metadata by making a vector of it. Now different objects might have
the same metadata and
Ian Price ianpric...@googlemail.com writes:
anyway. Anyway if vectors are immutable, as I believe they are, it
I, of course, meant vector literals, but a quick test shows this is not
the case.
(define v #(1 2 3))
(pk v)
(vector-set! v 0 #f)
(pk v)
~ $ guile -s /tmp/test.scm
;;; (#(1 2 3))
Yes, I can agree om that.
But this should be very stated clearly and perhaps added to a pitfall's
section.
/Stefan
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 9:13 PM, Ian Price ianpric...@googlemail.com wrote:
Stefan Israelsson Tampe stefan.ita...@gmail.com writes:
Is this an optimization we need. I can
Hi,
Ian Price ianpric...@googlemail.com skribis:
Attempting to resolve a guildhall bug with tupi[0], he mentioned
init.scm. I was not aware that guile read such a file, and it is not in
the manual, but it is in NEWS. So, first off, that situation should
change.
Agreed.
What I would like
Ian Price ianpric...@googlemail.com skribis:
Ian Price ianpric...@googlemail.com writes:
anyway. Anyway if vectors are immutable, as I believe they are, it
I, of course, meant vector literals, but a quick test shows this is not
the case.
It could be the case, though. Literal strings are
Hi David,
David A. Wheeler dwhee...@dwheeler.com skribis:
Guile support for curly-infix-expressions is very important to me.
Yet obviously guile has different semantics for #!, namely, #!...!#.
Clearly #!srfi-105 could be handled by a special case, but could
people live with that? I even
Hi,
Stefan Israelsson Tampe stefan.ita...@gmail.com skribis:
If I put,
(define a #(1))
(define b #(1))
, load the file. Then
(eq? a b)
#t
The R5RS reads (info (r5rs) Equivalence predicates):
Since it is an error to modify constant objects (those returned by
literal
10 matches
Mail list logo
