2009/1/5 Ludovic Courtès l...@gnu.org:
Hello!
Neil Jerram neiljer...@googlemail.com writes:
3. The ossau-gds-dev branch. This contains some minor improvements
to the Emacs interface. After the review of master is done, we'll
merge ossau-gds-dev into master.
I'd do (3) before (2) because
Hi,
David Séverin lpce@gmail.com writes:
Don't you think that the 'using thread' on debian [and other distro?]
shouldn't be
solved before to call a release '2.xx'?
That Debian builds Guile --without-threads is a Debian-specific problem.
The fact that Guile with and without threads
2009/1/12 Ludovic Courtès l...@gnu.org:
Hello,
Neil Jerram neiljer...@googlemail.com writes:
That's good, but I think I didn't explain the possible problem fully,
i.e. that the substitute won't work. Because of how Guile saves and
restores continuations (by copying the stack), and how it
2009/1/12 Neil Jerram neiljer...@googlemail.com:
2009/1/12 Ludovic Courtès l...@gnu.org:
Hello,
Neil Jerram neiljer...@googlemail.com writes:
That's good, but I think I didn't explain the possible problem fully,
i.e. that the substitute won't work. Because of how Guile saves and
restores
Hi Ludo! Thanks for your responses...
2009/1/8 Ludovic Courtès l...@gnu.org:
Hi Neil,
Neil Jerram neiljer...@googlemail.com writes:
Use of Gnulib
- linker warning
- alloca - Have we inadvertently removed requirement for a real alloca?
No. Gnulib's `alloca' provides a substitute when
Le Sat, 3 Jan 2009 18:38:13 +,
Neil Jerram neiljer...@googlemail.com a écrit :
We're clearly moving towards a 2.0 release. Here is my attempt to
pull that together a bit and flesh out what needs to be done.
What will go into 2.0:
Hi Guilers,
Don't you think that the 'using thread' on
Hi Neil,
Neil Jerram neiljer...@googlemail.com writes:
Below is a raw summary of all diffs between current branch_release-1-8
and master. Next step is to check that everything here is correct,
and properly+fully documented in the manual and in NEWS. The
Queries at the end are bits that I'm
2009/1/3 Neil Jerram neiljer...@googlemail.com:
I've started doing this review and will hopefully complete soon.
Below is a raw summary of all diffs between current branch_release-1-8
and master. Next step is to check that everything here is correct,
and properly+fully documented in the manual
2009/1/5 David Séverin da...@altosw.be:
Never used Texinfo :( I could learn, but right now I can not offer more than
using
guile and giving the best feedback I can on matters I feel knowledgeable
enough to
do so [I am alone managing a small company [+- a year late in my work]].
No
2009/1/5 Ludovic Courtès l...@gnu.org:
One specific query... Although I advocated removing GH before, I
don't feel 100% confident that that's the right thing for 2.0. I'm
wondering now if we should instead move the GH code into a separate
library, libgh, but continue to provide this as part
Hello!
Neil Jerram neiljer...@googlemail.com writes:
We're clearly moving towards a 2.0 release.
Cool!
2. The vm branch. Once the review of master is done, we'll merge
vm into master.
3. The ossau-gds-dev branch. This contains some minor improvements
to the Emacs interface. After the
2009/1/4 Neil Jerram neiljer...@googlemail.com:
2009/1/4 David Séverin da...@altosw.be:
Hi Guilers,
It might be a small thing [and of course not a priority at all], but I'd
love to see
a small evolution of the manual index structure in order to separate scheme
procedures from others,
Le Sun, 4 Jan 2009 16:25:47 +,
Neil Jerram neiljer...@googlemail.com a écrit :
2009/1/4 David Séverin da...@altosw.be:
Hi Guilers,
It might be a small thing [and of course not a priority at all], but I'd
love to
see a small evolution of the manual index structure in order to
Hi Guilers,
It might be a small thing [and of course not a priority at all], but I'd love
to see
a small evolution of the manual index structure in order to separate scheme
procedures from others, scheme variables from others...:
* Concept Index
* Scheme
2009/1/4 David Séverin da...@altosw.be:
Hi Guilers,
It might be a small thing [and of course not a priority at all], but I'd love
to see
a small evolution of the manual index structure in order to separate scheme
procedures from others, scheme variables from others...:
* Concept Index
Hi Neil,
On Sat 03 Jan 2009 19:38, Neil Jerram neiljer...@googlemail.com writes:
We're clearly moving towards a 2.0 release. Here is my attempt to
pull that together a bit and flesh out what needs to be done.
I think the plan is sensible.
2. The vm branch. Once the review of master is
We're clearly moving towards a 2.0 release. Here is my attempt to
pull that together a bit and flesh out what needs to be done.
That seems like a good plan on all counts, plus perhaps
period of feature freeze on master, with testing on many OS and
architecture variants, with a special
We're clearly moving towards a 2.0 release. Here is my attempt to
pull that together a bit and flesh out what needs to be done.
What will go into 2.0:
1. The git master branch. In principle, everything here, but we
need to review and check for
- anything that should be excluded
- any
18 matches
Mail list logo
