Re: Sting abstraction 2

2009-05-22 Thread Andy Wingo
On Wed 20 May 2009 17:24, Mike Gran spk...@yahoo.com writes: I've been working on the Unicode problem in Guile, and I had been too ambitious. I hacked it up pretty harsh and started getting errors that were tough to debug. Anyway, I backtracked a bit. FWIW this has happened to me a number

Sting abstraction 2

2009-05-20 Thread Mike Gran
Hi- I've been working on the Unicode problem in Guile, and I had been too ambitious. I hacked it up pretty harsh and started getting errors that were tough to debug. Anyway, I backtracked a bit. Today I pushed a new tree (string_abstraction2) which should be the same as master except with all

Re: Sting abstraction 2

2009-05-20 Thread Mike Gran
From: Ludovic Courtès l...@gnu.org Hello! Mike Gran writes: Anyway, I backtracked a bit.  Today I pushed a new tree (string_abstraction2) which should be the same as master except with all unnecessary calls to scm_i_string_chars, scm_i_symbol_chars, and

Re: Sting abstraction 2

2009-05-20 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hey, Mike Gran spk...@yahoo.com writes: So, same patches, different order, better testing.  Just try to git er done. OK, thanks for the explanation. (Did I ever mention this backtrace tree pic?  http://www.lonelycactus.com/uploaded_images/test[1]-765536.PNG  It shows that for all the