John Soo (2020-11-24 11:23 -0800) wrote:
> Hello Alex and Guix,
>
> Hope you are well.
Hello, I am fine, thanks!
> I volunteered to maintain some version of
> emacs-guix recently. How do you feel about a fork moving to Savannah?
You (and all the Guix people) are free to do whatever you think
Mathieu Othacehe (2019-10-14 16:54 +0200) wrote:
> Hey Pierre,
>
>> --8<---cut here---start->8---
>> (define-public cross-gcc
>> (package
>> (inherit ((@@ (gnu packages cross-base) cross-gcc)
>> "i686-unknown-linux-gnu"
>>
Ludovic Courtès (2019-04-07 18:24 +0200) wrote:
[...]
> As you found out, this is deprecated in favor of ‘keyboard-layout’,
> which has a couple of advantages: it’s uniform (the same config works
> for GRUB, Linux, and Xorg), and it’s installed from the initrd, so
> already effective when you
Mark H Weaver (2019-04-05 21:45 -0400) wrote:
> Hi Ludovic,
>
> guix-comm...@gnu.org writes:
>
>> civodul pushed a commit to branch master
>> in repository guix.
>>
>> commit 3a665637afc32a142dc24a77ce7ce9235eb6a3af
>> Author: Ludovic Courtès
>> Date: Wed Apr 3 14:32:41 2019 +0200
>>
>>
(This message is unrelated to the bug)
YOANN P (2018-09-27 20:03 +) wrote:
[...]
> Indeed, but I only found the IRC discussion between alezost and you who
> explained it clearly.
> I'm not sure that alezost and me was the only ones who do the same
> error
For the records: I did not do
Hello,
Let me announce Emacs-Build-Farm – Emacs interface for Hydra and Cuirass
(build farms used by Nix and Guix). This is a successor of
"guix-hydra-…" code from ‘emacs-guix’ package.
It can be installed from Guix (after "guix pull"):
guix package -i emacs-build-farm
In short,
Pierre Neidhardt (2018-07-21 23:55 +0200) wrote:
> Is the d3.js backend functional?
>
>> guix graph --backend=d3js coreutils > coreutils-graph.html
>
> result in a HTML page with a script, but the rendering remains blank. I don't
> know anything about d3js, I could be missing something trivial.
Pierre Neidhardt (2018-07-01 21:41 +0200) wrote:
> Maxim Cournoyer writes:
>
>>> - Perform transactions (install/remove) over multiple packages.
>>
>> To be fair, I think you can already accomplish this using emacs-guix by
>> separating with commas multiple package names :).
>
> Can you explain?
Maxim Cournoyer (2018-07-02 10:55 -0400) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Oleg Pykhalov writes:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> Pierre Neidhardt writes:
>>
>>> Maxim Cournoyer writes:
>>>
> - Perform transactions (install/remove) over multiple packages.
To be fair, I think you can already accomplish this
Ludovic Courtès (2018-05-29 21:31 +0200) wrote:
> Alex Kost skribis:
>
>> Ludovic Courtès (2018-05-28 11:34 +0200) wrote:
[...]
>>> Basically if you don’t have it, when you type “#$(foo)”, Paredit inserts
>>> a space before the opening parenthesis.
>>
>&g
Ricardo Wurmus (2018-05-29 13:32 +0200) wrote:
> Alex Kost writes:
>
>> Ricardo Wurmus (2018-05-28 21:25 +0200) wrote:
>>
>> [...]
>>> The update did break “emacs-minimal” and thus all Emacs packages, but
>>> that can be fixed by passing “--with-gnutls
Ricardo Wurmus (2018-05-28 21:25 +0200) wrote:
[...]
> The update did break “emacs-minimal” and thus all Emacs packages, but
> that can be fixed by passing “--with-gnutls=no” to emacs-minimal:
I like it! I think '*-minimal' packages should be as minimal as possible.
--
Alex
Ludovic Courtès (2018-05-28 11:34 +0200) wrote:
> Alex Kost skribis:
>
>> Highlighting? Sorry, I don't understand what you mean: highlighting
>> will not be effected in any way. The problem is that those
>> 'modify-syntax-entry' lines in ".dir-locals.el"
Ludovic Courtès (2018-05-23 14:33 +0200) wrote:
> Hello!
>
> Alex Kost <alez...@gmail.com> skribis:
>
>> Pierre Neidhardt (2018-05-20 21:57 +0200) wrote:
>>
>>> I recently noticed that guix-devel-mode misbehaved on packages ending
>>> with a &quo
Pierre Neidhardt (2018-05-20 21:57 +0200) wrote:
> I recently noticed that guix-devel-mode misbehaved on packages ending
> with a "+" (like my recent emacs-image+).
>
> See https://github.com/alezost/guix.el/issues/24 for more details.
>
> Alex Kost suggested we remov
Oleg Pykhalov (2018-05-06 20:39 +0300) wrote:
> Alex Kost <alez...@gmail.com> writes:
>
> […]
>
>> I don't understand what mechanism you mean. Why it cannot simply be
>> removed?
>
> ‘guix import elpa’ should remove ‘let-alist’ or ‘guix lint’ should
>
Oleg Pykhalov (2018-05-04 21:50 +0300) wrote:
> In addion to my previous answer.
>
> Oleg Pykhalov writes:
>
> […]
>
>>> 'let-alist' is a part of Emacs (that's why it was removed by commit
>>> 469c7ce0¹). Is there a reason to add it?
>
> […]
>
>> Elpa importer could
Hello Oleg, I have found you added a lot of new Emacs packages, thank
you!
Oleg Pykhalov (2018-05-02 13:21 -0400) wrote:
> wigust pushed a commit to branch master
> in repository guix.
>
> commit 15d568330bdd10694b358ff0d5de909ced7f7cdd
> Author: Oleg Pykhalov
> Date: Wed
Oleg Pykhalov (2018-03-07 12:46 +0300) wrote:
> Hello Ludovic and Guix,
>
> l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
[...]
>> +`(("en"
>> + "Subscribe to the Help mailing list to get support from the GuixSD
>> +and GNU Guix community via email. You can post messages in English though
>>
Ludovic Courtès (2017-10-04 09:35 +0200) wrote:
> Howdy Alex,
>
> I just noticed that ‘M-x guix-system-generations’ followed by ‘i’
> doesn’t correctly handle UUID objects in the ‘root-device’ or
> ‘store-device’ fields. Here’s the backtrace:
[...]
> I wonder if this was already the case before
Hartmut Goebel (2017-09-22 14:13 +0200) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just stepped into problems listing the generations of "system". Then I
> found out:
>
> "guix system" uses sub-commands
>
> guix system list-generations
> guix system roll-back
> guix system switch-generation
>
> Contrary to
Feng Shu (2017-09-22 06:45 +0800) wrote:
> ---
> 851d0m0xsz4v0hjw98rypisxn34rq012-font-wqy-microhei-0.2.0-beta:
> 总用量 864
> dr-xr-xr-x3 root root4096 1月 1 1970 .
> drwxrwxr-t 1726 root guixbuild 872448 9月 22 06:35 ..
> dr-xr-xr-x3 root root4096 1月 1 1970 share
Maxim Cournoyer (2017-09-01 10:49 -0400) wrote:
> Hi Alex!
>
> Alex Kost <alez...@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> Maxim Cournoyer (2017-08-15 12:08 -0400) wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 9:52 AM, Alex Kost <alez...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> [...]
&g
Feng Shu (2017-07-26 20:44 +0800) wrote:
> l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
[...]
>> The rest (setting up the symlink) is a little less convenient though.
>> See (guix scripts package) or the equivalent Emacs-Guix code for how
>> this works.
>
> (build-and-use-profile store
Ludovic Courtès (2017-07-25 12:26 +0200) wrote:
> Hello Guix!
>
> Ricardo Wurmus skribis:
>
>> Ricardo Wurmus writes:
>>
Now if one could pass a manifest or a system configuration to “guix
weather” and it would show how many of the desired
Kyle Meyer (2017-07-24 18:25 -0400) wrote:
> Alex Kost <alez...@gmail.com> writes:
>
> [...]
>
>>>> However, I agree that GUIX_ENVIRONMENT should be honored, but as I wrote
>>>> *not instead* but *along with* the default profiles. So if you st
Kyle Meyer (2017-07-25 21:40 -0400) wrote:
> Marius Bakke writes:
>
>> Wait, isn't this what --pure is for? I haven't followed the
>> discussion, but I would expect `guix environment` to *add* to my
>> current profile, and use '--pure' if I want a "clean" environment.
>
> I
Kyle Meyer (2017-07-23 18:29 -0400) wrote:
> Alex Kost <alez...@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> Kyle Meyer (2017-07-22 21:39 -0400) wrote:
>>
>>> I noticed that Emacs packages from the user's profile leak into guix
>>> environment calls.
>>
>>
Kyle Meyer (2017-07-22 21:39 -0400) wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I noticed that Emacs packages from the user's profile leak into guix
> environment calls.
As for me, this is a natural behaviour. If you want to be safe from any
external packages, site settings, etc., run "emacs -Q".
> For example, when
Feng Shu (2017-07-06 06:21 +0800) wrote:
> I want to build emacs-exwm-x in my guix-git repo with the following command:
>
>guix build emacs-exwm-x -f /home/feng/project/guix/gnu/packages/emacs.scm
>
> But it seem to do nothing, any suggestion?
As it is mentioned in the manual, when you use
Alex Vong (2017-07-04 16:16 +0800) wrote:
[...]
> Is there an intermediate approch? Is is possible for Emacs to signal a
> warning when the required features are not found, but still continue
> loading the rest of the config?
If you wish to have a message in *Messages* buffer, you can do it like
Ludovic Courtès (2017-07-03 23:53 +0200) wrote:
> Hi Alex,
>
> Alex Kost <alez...@gmail.com> skribis:
>
>> Ludovic Courtès (2017-06-30 11:35 +0200) wrote:
>
> [...]
>> I have a (probably not related) question though: in the past, package
>> 'l
Ludovic Courtès (2017-06-30 11:35 +0200) wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Ricardo Wurmus skribis:
>
>> Christopher Baines writes:
>>
>>> Recently I had problems with the way GUIX_PACKAGE_PATH was working with
>>> govuk-guix [1]. Currently, I'm using a separate directory
Alex Vong (2017-06-29 12:28 +0800) wrote:
> "Feng Shu" writes:
>
>> Now I have found that 'guix pull' is too slow,
>> I need 3 hours to compile guix, is it possible to speed it ?
>
> Maybe you can try building from git instead? I used to run
> '$ guix pull && guix package
Christopher Baines (2017-06-23 21:20 +0100) wrote:
> Hey,
>
> Recently I had problems with the way GUIX_PACKAGE_PATH was working with
> govuk-guix [1]. Currently, I'm using a separate directory for the
> GUIX_PACKAGE_PATH that contains symlinks to a subset of the Guile
> modules necessary for the
Adam Van Ymeren (2017-06-10 12:32 -0400) wrote:
> On June 10, 2017 12:04:59 PM EDT, Alex Kost <alez...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>I also needed similar functionality, but since I didn't want to depend
>>on guix modules
>
> Why not depend on guix modules? I'm not a
Mike Gerwitz (2017-06-10 10:42 -0400) wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 10, 2017 at 12:08:21 +0200, Mathieu Othacehe wrote:
>> The script is becoming bigger and some parts of Guix would be really
>> handy : (guix records), (guix workers), (guix utils) ...
>>
>> I don't want Guix to become a dependency of my
Mark H Weaver (2017-06-06 16:47 -0400) wrote:
> Alex Kost <alez...@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> Mark H Weaver (2017-06-04 20:15 -0400) wrote:
>>
>>>> +(define-public s
>>>> + (let ((commit "6604341edb3a775ff94415762af3ee9bd86bfb3c")
>>
Mark H Weaver (2017-06-04 20:15 -0400) wrote:
>> +(define-public s
>> + (let ((commit "6604341edb3a775ff94415762af3ee9bd86bfb3c")
>> +(revision "1"))
>> +(package
>> + (name "s")
>> + (version (string-append "0.0.0-" revision "." (string-take commit 7)))
>
> I think we
Ludovic Courtès (2017-05-17 10:28 +0200) wrote:
> Hi Alex,
>
> Alex Kost <alez...@gmail.com> skribis:
>
>> This is almost the same message as:
>>
>> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2016-09/msg01570.html
>>
>> I mean this is a remin
If it's not too late for the release, I think it would be good to make
guile-json an optional dependency (currently it is required). A simple
fix is here:
http://debbugs.gnu.org/26860
Although Ricardo suggested another solution there.
--
Alex
This is almost the same message as:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2016-09/msg01570.html
I mean this is a reminder on the subject.
Ludovic, I think you suggested a good solution to a "Customizing
/etc/profile" problem. Since I will no longer be a blocker of
doubleplusgoo...@gmail.com (2017-05-05 22:13 -0400) wrote:
> Pretty small patch for my first time commiting.
Hello and welcome! I also have a couple of notes additionally to what
Arun wrote.
> From ff50a931905376440f245c37df620d724a78dde9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: "Ethan R. Jones"
Mark H Weaver (2017-04-21 14:05 -0400) wrote:
> l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
>> In hindsight, it would have been wiser to just rename ‘_’ in (guix ui)
>> to something else, like ‘G_’. Well, it’s not too late. Should we do
>> that? Thoughts?
>
> I agree that renaming '_' in (guix ui)
myglc2 (2017-04-16 00:19 -0400) wrote:
> On 04/15/2017 at 16:20 Chris Marusich writes:
[...]
> The geiser doc says ...
>
>You can also specify a couple more initialisation parameters. For
> Guile, 'geiser-guile-load-path' is a list of paths to add to its load
> path (and its
Arun Isaac (2017-04-14 14:33 +0530) wrote:
> The install phase of the emacs-build-system simply copies all files to
> the output directory. This ends up copying many unnecessary files such
> as README, Makefile, tests, hidden files such as .gitignore,
> .travis.yml, etc. MELPA package recipes, on
myglc2 (2017-04-10 18:56 -0400) wrote:
> Info source was included but not previously being built.
>
> From 5b757a33ffb1528621027aeecff07a7b95c5df39 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: George Clemmer
> Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2017 18:31:52 -0400
> Subject: [PATCH] gnu: emacs-ag:
To make it clear, this is a question about Emacs-Guix.
Feng Shu (2017-04-12 07:10 +0800) wrote:
> Maybe we should add three addition keybinding:
>
> 1. Force rebuild the package defined by the current variable definition.
What do you mean? What is the analogous guix shell command?
> 2.
Alex Kost (2017-04-11 23:04 +0300) wrote:
> Chris Marusich (2017-04-11 00:40 -0700) wrote:
>
>> Alex Kost <alez...@gmail.com> writes:
>>
>>> Note, however, that in most cases (not in this case) using "require" is
>>> not needed at all! Usua
Chris Marusich (2017-04-11 00:40 -0700) wrote:
> Alex Kost <alez...@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> Note, however, that in most cases (not in this case) using "require" is
>> not needed at all! Usually it is enough to have the generated
>> autoloads. For example
Alex Kost (2017-04-10 13:10 +0300) wrote:
> Chris Marusich (2017-04-08 17:21 -0700) wrote:
[...]
>> +(define-public emacs-default-encrypt
>> + (package
>> +(name "emacs-default-encrypt")
>> +(version "4.3")
>> +(source
>>
Chris Marusich (2017-04-08 17:21 -0700) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to package DefaultEncrypt:
>
> https://www.emacswiki.org/emacs/DefaultEncrypt
>
> I've made a package definition (see attached patch), and it builds
> without error. I've installed it into my user profile. Per the
>
myglc2 (2017-04-06 13:06 -0400) wrote:
> On 01/18/2017 at 10:02 Alex Kost writes:
>
>> alezost pushed a commit to branch master
>> in repository guix.
>>
>> commit cf006d2e738f473e7fb630b566e04c4872fa204b
>> Author: Christopher Baines <m...@cbaines.net>
Arun Isaac (2017-03-28 20:08 +0530) wrote:
> Many emacs packages have tests in something like
> "packagename-tests.el".
How many? My impression is that only few of them have. Anyway...
> Would it be a good idea to add a `check' phase
> to the emacs build system that looks for these test
Ludovic Courtès (2017-03-24 10:38 +0100) wrote:
> Hi Alex,
>
> Sorry for the delay.
No problem! My delays are longer :-)
> Alex Kost <alez...@gmail.com> skribis:
>
>> From 8d8a79d69619b68dd3a798e7456bfd871fcb8395 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: Alex Kost <
John Darrington (2017-03-20 07:38 +0100) wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 02:18:39AM -0400, Leo Famulari wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 07:03:03AM +0100, John Darrington wrote:
> > > +(source (origin
> > > + (method url-fetch)
> > > +
Kei Kebreau (2017-03-19 17:03 -0400) wrote:
> This is interesting. Which module contains the definition for the
> 'every' procedure?
(srfi srfi-1)
You can read the documentation for 'every' in the Guile manual:
(info "(guile) SRFI-1 Searching")
--
Alex
Ludovic Courtès (2017-03-16 23:29 +0100) wrote:
> Alex Kost <alez...@gmail.com> skribis:
>
>> Ludovic Courtès (2017-03-15 17:14 +0100) wrote:
>>
>>> Alex Kost <alez...@gmail.com> skribis:
>>>
>>>> Hello, I've noticed that severa
Pjotr Prins (2017-03-14 15:18 +) wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 05:28:52PM +0300, Alex Kost wrote:
>> No, "$HOME/guix-test-profile" was not a symlink to
>> "/var/guix/profiles/...". Try this:
>
> Hmmm. You are right. ~/.guix-profile, meanwile, does
Federico Beffa (2017-03-14 17:43 +0100) wrote:
> Alex Kost <alez...@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> Federico Beffa (2017-03-14 09:42 +0100) wrote:
>>
>>> Pjotr Prins <pjotr.publi...@thebird.nl> writes:
>>> 'guix -p $HOME/guix-test-profile' lists onl
Ludovic Courtès (2017-03-15 17:14 +0100) wrote:
> Hi Alex,
>
> Alex Kost <alez...@gmail.com> skribis:
>
>> Hello, I've noticed that several packages contain "@code" structures in
>> their synopses, but only 'description' field supports texinfo markup.
>&
Federico Beffa (2017-03-14 09:42 +0100) wrote:
> Pjotr Prins <pjotr.publi...@thebird.nl> writes:
>
>> On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 10:35:56PM +0300, Alex Kost wrote:
>>> Federico Beffa (2017-03-12 18:28 +0100) wrote:
>>>
>>> > Hi,
>
Pjotr Prins (2017-03-14 05:55 +) wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 10:35:56PM +0300, Alex Kost wrote:
>> Federico Beffa (2017-03-12 18:28 +0100) wrote:
>>
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > I've created a profile for test purposes with
>> >
>> >
Federico Beffa (2017-03-12 18:28 +0100) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've created a profile for test purposes with
>
> guix package -p $HOME/guix-test-profile -m test-manifest.scm
>
> that now I would like to delete. I've looked up the documentation but
> not found any suitable command. What's the
Ricardo Wurmus (2017-02-27 16:07 +0100) wrote:
> Alex Kost <alez...@gmail.com> writes:
>
>>> IIUC Ludovic is AFK now, so I would like to push these patches in a week
>>> or so, if there will be no comments.
>>
>> Since there were no comments, I app
Alex Kost (2017-02-18 12:21 +0300) wrote:
> Hello, as discussed at
>
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2016-12/msg01174.html
>
> this patchset moves linux-libre .conf files and "guix-emacs.el" (needed
> for Emacs) to "gnu/packages/aux-files&
Tomas Cech (2017-02-20 09:59 +0100) wrote:
[...]
> So, guys, where are your GIT repositories for GUIX_PACKAGE_PATH?
There are several links here:
https://gitlab.com/rain1/guix-wiki/wikis/Packaging
--
Alex
David Craven (2017-02-17 13:56 +0100) wrote:
>> I think if you posit a free software project that works in the way you
>> describe ("on its own"), it would work very much like Guile works
>> right now.
>
> An operating system has to work on all hardware. Asking people to buy a
> RYF approved
e.am
index 8fe22d4..1e26da8 100644
--- a/Makefile.am
+++ b/Makefile.am
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
# GNU Guix --- Functional package management for GNU
# Copyright © 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017 Ludovic Courtès <l...@gnu.org>
# Copyright © 2013 Andreas Enge <andr...@enge.fr>
-# Co
Hello, as discussed at
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2016-12/msg01174.html
this patchset moves linux-libre .conf files and "guix-emacs.el" (needed
for Emacs) to "gnu/packages/aux-files", also it modifies "guix-emacs.el"
a bit. These patches shouldn't change anything in a user
r <m...@netris.org>
;;; Copyright © 2014 Eric Bavier <bav...@member.fsf.org>
-;;; Copyright © 2016 Alex Kost <alez...@gmail.com>
+;;; Copyright © 2016, 2017 Alex Kost <alez...@gmail.com>
;;; Copyright © 2016 Mathieu Lirzin <m...@gnu.org>
;;;
;;; This file is part
David Craven (2017-02-16 01:14 +0100) wrote:
> Hello guixers!
Hello David, thank you very much for all the great work you did for
Guix!
> I am very grateful for all the things I could learn during my time
> here and all the awesome work that you guys put in.
>
> But I wish to leave the guix
Ludovic Courtès (2017-02-08 16:21 +0100) wrote:
> Hello,
>
> huang_ying_cari...@163.com skribis:
>
>> l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
>
> [...]
>
>>> First we need a simple ‘special-files’ service or something (for /bin/sh
>>> and /usr/bin/env).
>>>
>>> Then the whole battle will be about
contact@cryptolab.net (2017-02-03 20:34 +) wrote:
> There are no releases, and I don't know how/if there are certain
> expectations about themes. If loading them just via (require 'dream) is
> not normal, should it be mentioned in the description?
> See
Ludovic Courtès (2017-02-05 13:09 +0100) wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Sorry for the delay. I secretly hope somebody would answer, but this is
> such a hot topic that nobody dared. ;-)
>
> "Huang, Ying" skribis:
>
>> It is a common practice to use /usr/bin/env in script shabang
Federico Beffa (2017-02-05 11:48 +0100) wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 4, 2017 at 8:02 PM, Alex Kost <alez...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Federico Beffa (2017-02-04 15:50 +0100) wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> for some reason Guix can't find (gnutls) despite th
Federico Beffa (2017-02-04 15:50 +0100) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> for some reason Guix can't find (gnutls) despite the module being
> installed and usable in Guile:
[...]
> Any suggestion?
Check that guix-daemon is also started with GUILE_LOAD_[COMPILED_]PATH
environment containing gnutls modules.
--
Ludovic Courtès (2017-02-03 17:45 +0100) wrote:
> Alex Kost <alez...@gmail.com> skribis:
>
>> Ludovic Courtès (2017-02-01 23:52 +0100) wrote:
>>
>>> Clément Lassieur <clem...@lassieur.org> skribis:
>>>
>>>> * gnu/packages/
Adonay Felipe Nogueira (2017-01-23 10:46 -0200) wrote:
> Hi all! :)
>
> About my copyright notice: I try to always expose alternative ways with
> which people can reach me, from less varying to most varying.
OK, I see that your other commits also have this libreplanet URL in the
copyright line,
Thomas Danckaert (2017-02-03 13:22 +0100) wrote:
>> Oh, I just realized that's probably why you used 'load-path' instead
>> of
>> 'image-load-path', right?
>
> load-path, shmoad-path ;-) I was just confused (even more so because
> load-path is part of image-load-path).
He-he :-)
>> [...]
>> No
Thomas Danckaert (2017-02-02 19:41 +0100) wrote:
> From: Alex Kost <alez...@gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add emacs-mew.
> Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2017 11:56:22 +0300
>
>> OK, I see. We can just patch "mew-key.el" file by putting the
>> following
&g
ng0 (2017-02-02 10:08 +) wrote:
> Alex Kost writes:
>
>> contact@cryptolab.net (2017-02-01 18:08 +) wrote:
>>
>>> From: ng0 <contact@cryptolab.net>
>>>
>>> * gnu/packages/emacs.scm (emacs-pretty-mode): New
contact@cryptolab.net (2017-02-01 18:08 +) wrote:
> From: ng0
>
> * gnu/packages/emacs.scm (emacs-pretty-mode): New variable.
> ---
> gnu/packages/emacs.scm | 23 +++
> 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git
Ludovic Courtès (2017-02-01 23:52 +0100) wrote:
> Clément Lassieur skribis:
>
>> * gnu/packages/emacs.scm (magit): Update to 2.10.1.
>
> Applied, thanks!
No, no, arrgh! I didn't update magit to 2.10.1 because it has a bug
that makes "C" key in COMMIT_EDITMSG buffer
Thomas Danckaert (2017-02-01 11:56 +0100) wrote:
>> Also I see that by default it puts image files into
>> "share/emacs/site-lisp/mew/etc". I don't think this is a good
>> place, I would rather move them to "share/mew" as most packages do
>> with various additional files.
>
> Yes, that would be
-public mu
>(package
> (name "mu")
Also it is good to generate "mew-autoloads.el" file, so that "M-x mew"
command will be available for users by default. I'm attaching a
modified patch to address what I mentioned. Could you test it to make
sure that
Mathieu Othacehe (2017-01-27 14:43 +0100) wrote:
> * gnu/packages/emacs.scm (emacs-alert): New variable.
> ---
> gnu/packages/emacs.scm | 26 ++
> 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/gnu/packages/emacs.scm b/gnu/packages/emacs.scm
> index
Ludovic Courtès (2017-01-28 00:16 +0100) wrote:
> Alex Kost <alez...@gmail.com> skribis:
>
>> Mathieu OTHACEHE (2017-01-27 11:16 +0100) wrote:
>>
>>>> On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 12:20:46PM +0300, Alex Kost wrote:
>>>>> Mathieu Othacehe (2017-01
Mathieu OTHACEHE (2017-01-27 11:16 +0100) wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 12:20:46PM +0300, Alex Kost wrote:
>>> Mathieu Othacehe (2017-01-26 13:31 +0100) wrote:
>>> > + (uri (string-append
>>> > + "http://melpa.o
Mathieu Othacehe (2017-01-26 13:31 +0100) wrote:
> * gnu/packages/emacs.scm (emacs-ht): New variable.
> ---
> gnu/packages/emacs.scm | 25 +
> 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/gnu/packages/emacs.scm b/gnu/packages/emacs.scm
> index d3e64c04f..699d41712
Thomas Danckaert (2017-01-24 21:08 +0100) wrote:
> From: Thomas Danckaert
> Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Add emacs-mew.
> Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2017 18:01:11 +0100 (CET)
>
>> From 3759a0a4720165e0443bdb7522f6b4b7515aec6f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: Thomas Danckaert
Adonay Felipe Nogueira (2017-01-15 11:48 -0200) wrote:
> After so much wait, we got L'Abbaye des Morts game out of Google
> Code. :)
>
> I had to remove the bundled fonts because they no longer use these
> directly in the game. It seems to be in their repository just because
> they don't want to
Ludovic Courtès (2017-01-19 12:51 +0100) wrote:
> Alex Kost <alez...@gmail.com> skribis:
>
>> Ludovic Courtès (2017-01-15 23:11 +0100) wrote:
>>
[...]
>>> I see. So maybe we should just add a rule for ‘match’ in
>>> .dir-locals.el; any downside to th
ng0 (2017-01-18 11:51 +) wrote:
> Alex Kost <alez...@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> ng0 (2017-01-15 21:10 +) wrote:
>>
>>> From: ng0 <n...@we.make.ritual.n0.is>
>>>
>>> * gnu/packages/emacs.scm (emacs-sx): New variable.
>>
&
Christopher Baines (2017-01-17 20:08 +) wrote:
> ng0 writes:
>
>> Hartmut Goebel writes:
>>
>>> Am 15.01.2017 um 17:13 schrieb ng0:
> Am 15.01.2017 um 12:25 schrieb Christopher Baines:
>> the silver searcher
> Please explain
ng0 (2017-01-15 21:10 +) wrote:
> From: ng0
>
> * gnu/packages/emacs.scm (emacs-sx): New variable.
Thanks, I committed it as 899bcad310. See the comments below.
> ---
> gnu/packages/emacs.scm | 26 +-
> 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+),
Ricardo Wurmus (2017-01-17 16:26 +0100) wrote:
> Hartmut Goebel writes:
>
>> Am 17.01.2017 um 15:11 schrieb Ricardo Wurmus:
>>> * gnu/packages/python.scm (python-argparse, python2-argparse): New
>>
>> As of Python >= 2.7 and >= 3.2, the argparse module is maintained
Ricardo Wurmus (2017-01-17 15:11 +0100) wrote:
[...]
> +(define-public python-argparse
> + (package
> +(name "python-argparse")
> +(version "1.4.0")
> +(source
> + (origin
> + (method url-fetch)
> + (uri (pypi-uri "argparse" version))
> + (sha256
> +
Ludovic Courtès (2017-01-15 23:11 +0100) wrote:
> Alex Kost <alez...@gmail.com> skribis:
>
>> Ludovic Courtès (2017-01-14 22:16 +0100) wrote:
>>
>>>> +(define (uglify-field-name name)
>>>> + (match name
>>>> + ('verbosi
Christopher Baines (2017-01-15 11:25 +) wrote:
> * gnu/packages/emacs.scm (emacs-ag): New variable.
> ---
> gnu/packages/emacs.scm | 27 +++
> 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/gnu/packages/emacs.scm b/gnu/packages/emacs.scm
> index
1 - 100 of 1224 matches
Mail list logo