On Fri, 12 Jan 2024 at 20:46, Liliana Marie Prikler
wrote:
> PS: I should probably just write the patch myself at this point, but I
> feel like it'll be misunderstood either way.
Sorry but I do not understand how your proposal would work in tandem
with the current "guix edit". So yes, please
Am Freitag, dem 12.01.2024 um 19:49 +0100 schrieb Simon Tournier:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, 12 Jan 2024 at 18:39, Liliana Marie Prikler
> wrote:
>
> > > Well, I see how to write specific Scheme wrapper around $EDITOR;
> > > as I did in [1].
> > >
> > > Or, I see how to tweak guix/scripts/edit.scm for
Hi,
On Fri, 12 Jan 2024 at 18:39, Liliana Marie Prikler
wrote:
> > Well, I see how to write specific Scheme wrapper around $EDITOR; as I
> > did in [1].
> >
> > Or, I see how to tweak guix/scripts/edit.scm for running specific
> > launcher depending on $EDITOR.
> >
> > Liliana, could you
Am Freitag, dem 12.01.2024 um 10:35 +0100 schrieb Simon Tournier:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, 20 Nov 2023 at 20:33, Liliana Marie Prikler
> wrote:
>
> > > 2. Do we put this code in some etc/vscode-wrapper that user can
> > > install? (or that we could automatically installl) Or maybe
> > > revamp it
Hi,
On Mon, 20 Nov 2023 at 20:33, Liliana Marie Prikler
wrote:
>> 2. Do we put this code in some etc/vscode-wrapper that user can
>> install? (or that we could automatically installl) Or maybe revamp
>> it
>> for calling this code via some shell function?
>
> With VSCode et al. not being
Am Samstag, dem 09.12.2023 um 10:24 +0100 schrieb Ludovic Courtès:
> Hi Liliana,
>
> Liliana Marie Prikler skribis:
>
> > > > Maybe we can check for a guix_editor shell function and invoke
> > > > that
> > > > rather than EDITOR if defined?
> > >
> > > ‘guix edit’ cannot “invoke” a shell
Hi Liliana,
Liliana Marie Prikler skribis:
>> > Maybe we can check for a guix_editor shell function and invoke that
>> > rather than EDITOR if defined?
>>
>> ‘guix edit’ cannot “invoke” a shell function though.
>>
>> I was thinking of something more gross, like checking whether the
>>
Am Mittwoch, dem 22.11.2023 um 19:21 +0100 schrieb Ludovic Courtès:
> Hello,
>
> Liliana Marie Prikler skribis:
>
> > Am Donnerstag, dem 16.11.2023 um 16:25 +0100 schrieb Ludovic
> > Courtès:
>
> [...]
>
> > > It’d be nice to support these as well. However, how do we know
> > > we’re
> > >
Hello,
Liliana Marie Prikler skribis:
> Am Donnerstag, dem 16.11.2023 um 16:25 +0100 schrieb Ludovic Courtès:
[...]
>> It’d be nice to support these as well. However, how do we know we’re
>> dealing with kate or VSCode? By checking the basename of $EDITOR?
>> Kinda ugly and brittle, but
Am Montag, dem 20.11.2023 um 10:40 +0100 schrieb Simon Tournier:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, 16 Nov 2023 at 17:04, Liliana Marie Prikler
> wrote:
>
> > > It’d be nice to support these as well. However, how do we know
> > > we’re dealing with kate or VSCode? By checking the basename of
> > > $EDITOR?
Hi,
On Thu, 16 Nov 2023 at 17:04, Liliana Marie Prikler
wrote:
>> It’d be nice to support these as well. However, how do we know we’re
>> dealing with kate or VSCode? By checking the basename of $EDITOR?
>> Kinda ugly and brittle, but probably better than nothing.
>
> Maybe we can check for
Am Donnerstag, dem 16.11.2023 um 16:25 +0100 schrieb Ludovic Courtès:
> Liliana Marie Prikler skribis:
>
> > Am Donnerstag, dem 02.11.2023 um 10:43 +0100 schrieb Simon
> > Tournier:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > The command “guix edit” returns “+N path/to/file” that is then
> > > passed to $EDITOR.
Liliana Marie Prikler skribis:
> Am Donnerstag, dem 02.11.2023 um 10:43 +0100 schrieb Simon Tournier:
>> Hi,
>>
>> The command “guix edit” returns “+N path/to/file” that is then passed
>> to $EDITOR. Therefore $EDITOR needs the command line:
>>
>> $ $EDITOR +N /path/to/file
>>
>> Well,
Am Donnerstag, dem 02.11.2023 um 10:43 +0100 schrieb Simon Tournier:
> Hi,
>
> The command “guix edit” returns “+N path/to/file” that is then passed
> to $EDITOR. Therefore $EDITOR needs the command line:
>
> $ $EDITOR +N /path/to/file
>
> Well, that is accepted by many $EDITOR, to my
14 matches
Mail list logo
