Re: bug#40316: nss not reproducible

2024-05-14 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hi, Christina O'Donnell skribis: > On 06/05/2024 11:12, Ludovic Courtès wrote: [...] >> For sure I’d be happy if the test suite could run faster, but does >> upstream offer such an option? When you say “a single pass”, is that >> something upstream supports? > Yes, you can control the tests

Re: bug#40316: nss not reproducible

2024-05-06 Thread Christina O'Donnell
Hi, On 06/05/2024 11:12, Ludovic Courtès wrote: Hi, Christina O'Donnell skribis: Tangentially, given how long nss takes to build, do you think that it'd be worth shaving it down to a single test pass? Currently it runs each test up to 3 times, which takes ~1h on my machine with no other

Re: bug#40316: nss not reproducible

2024-05-06 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hi, Christina O'Donnell skribis: > Tangentially, given how long nss takes to build, do you think that > it'd be worth shaving it down to a single test pass? Currently it runs > each test up to 3 times, which takes ~1h on my machine with no other > build running. Running only the standard pass

Re: bug#40316: nss not reproducible

2024-05-02 Thread Christina O'Donnell
Hi Ludo', This doesn't look directly related. I haven't seen anything like this occur when I build it. Tangentially, given how long nss takes to build, do you think that it'd be worth shaving it down to a single test pass? Currently it runs each test up to 3 times, which takes ~1h on my

Re: bug#40316: nss not reproducible

2024-05-02 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hi Christina, Nice work! Christina O'Donnell skribis: > I've got as far as making nss 3.98 reproducible, however updating it to 3.99 > results in 51 test failures. These are regressions, and worked correctly for > 3.98. I'm not entirely sure what the issue is, but I've run out of time to >