On 9/23/18 6:09 PM, Joshua Branson wrote:
> Jan Nieuwenhuizen writes:
>
>> Ludovic Courtès writes:
>>
>> Hi!
>>
>> Yay! I think the way forward to reduce them further that I like best is
>> to assume Guile and start building a Gash/Geesh and the other utilities
>> from there.
>>
>
> Can you
Jan Nieuwenhuizen writes:
> Ludovic Courtès writes:
>
> Hi!
>
> Yay! I think the way forward to reduce them further that I like best is
> to assume Guile and start building a Gash/Geesh and the other utilities
> from there.
>
Can you link to Gash/Geesh? I can't find it via google.
>
> Thanks
Jan Nieuwenhuizen writes:
> Jan Nieuwenhuizen writes:
>
>> Hmm, make check showed some silly errors, I needed this patch
>
> And I needed another one to get tests/builders.scm to pass. And
> although it passes it builds most of Mes bootstrap in ./test-tmp, which
> takes quite a bit of time.
>
>
Jan Nieuwenhuizen writes:
> Hmm, make check showed some silly errors, I needed this patch
And I needed another one to get tests/builders.scm to pass. And
although it passes it builds most of mes bootstrap in ./test-tmp, which
takes quite a bit of time.
Moreover, quite some other problems
Ludovic Courtès writes:
Hi!
>> I finally realised what it really means that the GuixSD bootstrap has
>> `binutils-cross-boot0' (I really think that should be reflected in the
>> SCM name too?) and `gcc-cross-boot0': bolting the x86_64-linux bootstrap
>> onto the i686-linux Mes bootstrap proved
Ludovic Courtès writes:
Hi Ludo',
> (And sorry for the delay; I reckon my mail scheduling algorithm leaves a
> lot to be desired…)
AFAICS, esp. what's coming your way you schedule way better than I do ;)
>> +@node Reduced Binary Seed Bootstrap
>> +@section The Reduced Binary Seed Bootstrap
>
>
Hello!
Jan Nieuwenhuizen skribis:
> Jan Nieuwenhuizen writes:
>
>> Just to give you a heads up: four `Oops' fixup-commits later I decided
>> to squash them again and create a fresh wip-bootstrap: d7feea557.
>>
>> I think it could be ready for a rename to core-updates-next.
>>
>> $ guix hash -r
Hello!
(And sorry for the delay; I reckon my mail scheduling algorithm leaves a
lot to be desired…)
Jan Nieuwenhuizen skribis:
> Ludovic Courtès writes:
[...]
>> $ guix hash -r /gnu/store/58q6748dydqxrhrw8xn2gsf60djl6gvv-hello-2.10
>> 005zi21nvhmygjam6vsvkgmw9awsmyacz6a65naxcblrpbra1g94
>
>
Jan Nieuwenhuizen writes:
> Just to give you a heads up: four `Oops' fixup-commits later I decided
> to squash them again and create a fresh wip-bootstrap: d7feea557.
>
> I think it could be ready for a rename to core-updates-next.
>
> $ guix hash -r
Jan Nieuwenhuizen writes:
> I just push a fresh wip-bootstrap 6d975c901, and all differences between
> native x86 and --system=i686-linux are now gone!
Just to give you a heads up: four `Oops' fixup-commits later I decided
to squash them again and create a fresh wip-bootstrap: d7feea557.
I
Jan Nieuwenhuizen writes:
Hi Ludo'!
Replying to your initial review to notice the things that I initially
postponed and now have been done and the things that are still todo.
>> Previously we discussed that “-s i686-linux” on x86_64 would lead to a
>> different graph compared to a native
Vincent Legoll writes:
> nice work here !
Thanks!
>> +Guix---like other GNU/Linux distributions---is traditionally bootstrapped
>> from
>> +from a set of bootstrap binaries: Bourne shell, command-line tools provided
>> by
>
> double "from-from"
Thanks, fixed.
janneke
Ricardo Wurmus writes:
> Hi janneke!
Hi Ricardo!
>> +Guix---like other GNU/Linux distributions---is traditionally bootstrapped
>> from
>> +from a set of bootstrap binaries: Bourne shell, command-line tools provided
>> by
>
> ^— this is an extra “from”.
thanks for pointing out all these
Hello,
nice work here !
On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 9:48 PM Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
> --8<---cut here---start->8---
> +Guix---like other GNU/Linux distributions---is traditionally bootstrapped
> from
> +from a set of bootstrap binaries: Bourne shell,
Hi janneke!
> I have added this text to wip-bootstrap, image not shown inline here,
> WDYT?
[…]
> +@node Reduced Binary Seed Bootstrap
> +@section The Reduced Binary Seed Bootstrap
> +
> +Guix---like other GNU/Linux distributions---is traditionally bootstrapped
> from
> +from a set of
Ludovic Courtès writes:
> It’s taken me a while but I successfully built
> /gnu/store/58q6748dydqxrhrw8xn2gsf60djl6gvv-hello-2.10
> for i686 from commit 5d8b7131c23d2285dd3546c59022dd5953508943 of
> ‘wip-bootstrap’. :-)
That's great!
> $ guix hash -r
Ricardo Wurmus writes:
> Using Janneke’s impressive work as the beginning of core-updates-next
> sounds good to me.
Thanks!
> I’m sorry I haven’t yet been able to review wip-bootstrap myself.
As you probably saw, Ludo' is already keeping me busy and quite some
things will need some more work.
Ludovic Courtès writes:
> Hello Janneke!
>
> It’s taken me a while but I successfully built
> /gnu/store/58q6748dydqxrhrw8xn2gsf60djl6gvv-hello-2.10
> for i686 from commit 5d8b7131c23d2285dd3546c59022dd5953508943 of
> ‘wip-bootstrap’. :-)
>
> --8<---cut
On Sun, Sep 16, 2018 at 09:24:20PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Hello Janneke!
>
> It’s taken me a while but I successfully built
> /gnu/store/58q6748dydqxrhrw8xn2gsf60djl6gvv-hello-2.10
> for i686 from commit 5d8b7131c23d2285dd3546c59022dd5953508943 of
> ‘wip-bootstrap’. :-)
I knew you
Hello Janneke!
It’s taken me a while but I successfully built
/gnu/store/58q6748dydqxrhrw8xn2gsf60djl6gvv-hello-2.10
for i686 from commit 5d8b7131c23d2285dd3546c59022dd5953508943 of
‘wip-bootstrap’. :-)
--8<---cut here---start->8---
$ guix hash -r
Gábor Boskovits writes:
> +) After bootstrapping a static glibc-2.2.5, I tried building a shared
> 2.2.5, 2.3, 2.3.4, 2.3.6, 2.4, 2.5 and 2.6. When all failed, I
> invested a couple of days to patch 2.3.6...but that started to look
> like a gargantuan undertaking. Iow,
Jan Nieuwenhuizen ezt írta (időpont: 2018. aug. 31., P
18:32):
> We have been working on the wip-bootstrap branch with the aim to remove
> bootstrap binary seeds. At the moment this is for i686-linux only.
>
> The first step was to build binutils-mesboot-2.20.1a,
> glibc-mesboot-2.2.5 and
We have been working on the wip-bootstrap branch with the aim to remove
bootstrap binary seeds. At the moment this is for i686-linux only.
The first step was to build binutils-mesboot-2.20.1a,
glibc-mesboot-2.2.5 and gcc-mesboot-4.7.4 without the use of any binary
binutils, glibc or gcc.
The
23 matches
Mail list logo
