Hi,
Christina O'Donnell skribis:
> On 06/05/2024 11:12, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
[...]
>> For sure I’d be happy if the test suite could run faster, but does
>> upstream offer such an option? When you say “a single pass”, is that
>> something upstream supports?
> Yes, you can control the tests
Hi,
On 06/05/2024 11:12, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
Hi,
Christina O'Donnell skribis:
Tangentially, given how long nss takes to build, do you think that
it'd be worth shaving it down to a single test pass? Currently it runs
each test up to 3 times, which takes ~1h on my machine with no other
Hi,
Christina O'Donnell skribis:
> Tangentially, given how long nss takes to build, do you think that
> it'd be worth shaving it down to a single test pass? Currently it runs
> each test up to 3 times, which takes ~1h on my machine with no other
> build running. Running only the standard pass
machine with no other build
running. Running only the standard pass takes 2.5-3x less time, which is
a huge quality of life improvement.
Kind regards,
Christina
On 02/05/2024 09:15, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
Hi Christina,
Nice work!
Christina O'Donnell skribis:
I've got as far as making nss
Hi Christina,
Nice work!
Christina O'Donnell skribis:
> I've got as far as making nss 3.98 reproducible, however updating it to 3.99
> results in 51 test failures. These are regressions, and worked correctly for
> 3.98. I'm not entirely sure what the issue is, but I've run ou
gnu/packages/patches/nss-Disable-library-signing.patch: Disable library
signing to make the build reproducible.
gnu/packages/nss.scm (nss): Apply this new patch.
Change-Id: I7860bae219ecc4a79423a590c27a1097ae2e7874
---
gnu/packages/nss.scm | 3 +-
Hi,
I believe I have a fix for this, I'm just waiting on my machine to hurry
up and confirm it, might end up running over night, then I'll send my
patch up.
I'm doing two native builds and two cross-builds.
I've also updated to 3.99.
Kind regards,
Christina
On 25/04/2024 15:06, Christina
