Marius Bakke skribis:
> Gábor Boskovits writes:
>
>> Ok, the keep it this way. Another question, this came up, as
>> I was trying to find a nice solution to reset-gzip-timestamps failing.
>> I got different pieces of advice if I should reset the
2018-02-15 15:16 GMT+01:00 Marius Bakke :
> Gábor Boskovits writes:
>
> > Ok, the keep it this way. Another question, this came up, as
> > I was trying to find a nice solution to reset-gzip-timestamps failing.
> > I got different pieces of advice if I
Gábor Boskovits writes:
> Ok, the keep it this way. Another question, this came up, as
> I was trying to find a nice solution to reset-gzip-timestamps failing.
> I got different pieces of advice if I should reset the permissions after
> resetting the timestamp, but I'm still
2018-02-15 14:22 GMT+01:00 Ludovic Courtès :
> Gábor Boskovits skribis:
>
> > Ok, the keep it this way. Another question, this came up, as
> > I was trying to find a nice solution to reset-gzip-timestamps failing.
> > I got different pieces of advice if I
Gábor Boskovits skribis:
> Ok, the keep it this way. Another question, this came up, as
> I was trying to find a nice solution to reset-gzip-timestamps failing.
> I got different pieces of advice if I should reset the permissions after
> resetting the timestamp, but I'm
2018-02-15 0:28 GMT+01:00 Ludovic Courtès :
> Gábor Boskovits skribis:
>
> > the make-file-writeable function seems a bit too imperative to me, it
> would
> > look better if we could have a with-file-writeable function, so that we
> can
> > constrain the size
Gábor Boskovits skribis:
> the make-file-writeable function seems a bit too imperative to me, it would
> look better if we could have a with-file-writeable function, so that we can
> constrain the size effect, and more. Moreover if a file is read-only to
> start with, it
2018-02-14 20:13 GMT+01:00 Leo Famulari :
> On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 02:51:08PM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> > Gábor Boskovits skribis:
> >
> > > the make-file-writeable function seems a bit too imperative to me, it
> would
> > > look better if we could
On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 02:51:08PM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Gábor Boskovits skribis:
>
> > the make-file-writeable function seems a bit too imperative to me, it would
> > look better if we could have a with-file-writeable function, so that we can
> > constrain the
Gábor Boskovits skribis:
> the make-file-writeable function seems a bit too imperative to me, it would
> look better if we could have a with-file-writeable function, so that we can
> constrain the size effect, and more. Moreover if a file is read-only to
> start with, it
the make-file-writeable function seems a bit too imperative to me, it would
look better if we could have a with-file-writeable function, so that we can
constrain the size effect, and more. Moreover if a file is read-only to
start with, it might be a good idea to keep it that way anyways. WDYT?
11 matches
Mail list logo