Success! Thank you.
65;6003;1c
On Fri, Apr 23, 2021 at 11:19:28AM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Florian, could you try again with the attached patch?
It succeeds on two full installs of Enlightenment, no errors, no
prolonged getting stuck.
> If you have the courage, it would be awesome if
This is a continuation of the thread started at http://issues.guix.gnu.org/47852
Ekaitz: What do we want to be the main point of the programs: their UI or their
goal?
jgart: I would prefer for them to be catalogued based on their intended usage
or goal, as Ekaitz
suggested.
What do people
Hi,
Are all these constants (%base-packages, for example)? Is this a Guix
convention or does it come from Guile? Although looking at Guile's Variable
index I see many constants in uppercase, and also some variables prefixed with
the percent sign, while Guix' Programming index doesn't seem to
Am Freitag, den 23.04.2021, 14:22 + schrieb Luis Felipe:
> Hi,
>
> Are all these constants (%base-packages, for example)? Is this a Guix
> convention or does it come from Guile? Although looking at Guile's
> Variable index I see many constants in uppercase, and also some
> variables prefixed
Hi,
Mark H Weaver writes:
> Hi Léo,
>
> Léo Le Bouter writes:
>
>> I don't share your analysis, the security fixes werent stripped because
>> glib/cairo was also updated to latest version in subsequent commits
>> which were pushed all at once.
>
> 'glib' was updated, but 'cairo' wasn't,
Hi Maxim!
Actually, there *is* a "new" stable release available on their release
page, 1.17.2
It seems 1.16.0 is the latest+stable version.
Quoting their download, "Please download one of the latest
[releases](https://cairographics.org/releases/) in order to get an
API-stable version of
On Fri, Apr 23, 2021 at 09:33:07PM +0200, Léo Le Bouter wrote:
> I knew about this but I didnt feel like telling Raghav to do yet
> another rebase. I felt like Raghav was taking on with so much already.
> The rebase was specially complicated because Raghav's commit changed
> indentation, git has
Hi,
On Thu, 22 Apr 2021 22:15:34 +0100
Christopher Baines wrote:
I'm stuck.
> I'd suggest avoiding '() as the value for hash and hash-algorithm when
> they're NULL in the database. One option here that I've used in some
> places is to return a alist rather than a list. This can simplify JSON
Hi Maxim!
Oh, indeed, sorry for the confusion. I think I got tricked by seeing
the changelog for 1.17.2 under their releases/ directory
(https://www.cairographics.org/releases/ChangeLog.cairo-1.17.2).
No worries! I was confused by that too, while I was working on cairo
package.
Regards,
Luciana Lima Brito writes:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, 22 Apr 2021 22:15:34 +0100
> Christopher Baines wrote:
>
> I'm stuck.
>
>> I'd suggest avoiding '() as the value for hash and hash-algorithm when
>> they're NULL in the database. One option here that I've used in some
>> places is to return a alist
Hello Maxim,
On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 10:00:15PM -0400, Maxim Cournoyer wrote:
> That's exactly what we're doing now (disable Go module with
> GO11MODULE=off and use GOPATH to find the sources). Debian does
> something lazy like just calling 'go module vendor', which builds a huge
> directory
Hello Raghav,
Raghav Gururajan writes:
> Hi Maxim!
>
>> Actually, there *is* a "new" stable release available on their release
>> page, 1.17.2
>
> It seems 1.16.0 is the latest+stable version.
>
> Quoting their download, "Please download one of the latest
>
On Fri, Apr 23, 2021 at 08:50:37PM +0200, Léo Le Bouter wrote:
> I think there is no problem in accepting criticism but there is a
> certain way Mark presents criticism and I don't feel like I can respond
> to it when it is written in such way. Over several emails Mark was
> looking to point to
Ludovic Courtès writes:
> Hello Chris!
>
> Christopher Baines skribis:
>
>> In May last year (2020), I submitted an application to NLNet. The work I
>> set out wasn't something I was doing at the time, but something I hadn't
>> yet found time to work on, tooling specifically around security
Bengt Richter writes:
> Given that crims monitor developer discussions to discover
> unfixed vulnerabilities and clues re exploiting them,
> what are your ideas to avoid building a tool that can be abused?
>
> E.g., How will your tool avoid leaking info during an embargo window
> while trusted
Hi,
A quick search got me this:
https://github.com/DalekBaldwin/on-lisp/blob/master/on-lisp.asd
So it seems that the license is an informal
> As long as you tell people it's modified and link to the original,
> that's fine. --pg
Not sure what to make of it.
I've heard of a few libraries
On Fri, 2021-04-23 at 15:18 -0400, Leo Famulari wrote:
> Léo and Raghav, you need to keep learning our workflow around
> security
> updates. It's not okay to remove security patches and later update a
> package to a fixed version in a different commit. `git rebase` is the
> tool to learn for
Am Freitag, den 23.04.2021, 15:04 + schrieb jgart:
> This is a continuation of the thread started at
> http://issues.guix.gnu.org/47852
>
> Ekaitz: What do we want to be the main point of the programs: their
> UI or their goal?
>
> jgart: I would prefer for them to be catalogued based on
On Fri, Apr 23, 2021 at 10:00:14PM +0200, Leo Prikler wrote:
> Spreadsheets sounds fine to me, but I think the most important ones
> (libreoffice and org-mode) are already excluded from that module for
> obvious reasons ;)
> Perhaps an even more generic "office" module might be better, because
>
On Fri, 2021-04-23 at 13:52 -0400, Maxim Cournoyer wrote:
> Actually, there *is* a "new" stable release available on their
> release
> page, 1.17.2 [0]
>
> According to NVD [1], that latest version has no known CVE [1].
>
> Léo, could it be that you had planned to do this update, but it
>
Hi,
Am Freitag, den 23.04.2021, 20:50 +0200 schrieb Léo Le Bouter:
> I think there is no problem in accepting criticism but there is a
> certain way Mark presents criticism and I don't feel like I can
> respond
> to it when it is written in such way. Over several emails Mark was
> looking to
Hi François,
François writes:
> Hello Maxim,
>
> On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 10:00:15PM -0400, Maxim Cournoyer wrote:
>> That's exactly what we're doing now (disable Go module with
>> GO11MODULE=off and use GOPATH to find the sources). Debian does
>> something lazy like just calling 'go module
On April 23, 2021, Leo Famulari wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 23, 2021 at 10:00:14PM +0200, Leo Prikler wrote:
> > Spreadsheets sounds fine to me, but I think the most important ones
> > (libreoffice and org-mode) are already excluded from that module for
> > obvious reasons ;)
> > Perhaps an even more
Hi,
On Fri, Apr 23 2021, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Maxim Cournoyer skribis:
>
>>> +(define-syntax-rule (without-field-serialization definition)
>>> + (syntax-parameterize ((configuration-field-serialization?
>>> + (identifier-syntax #f)))
>>> +definition
>>>
Hi,
On Fri, Apr 23 2021, Maxim Cournoyer wrote:
>> But the problem here is that it doesn’t force the user to configure the
>> field. In a Git config for example, the user should be forced to set
>> ‘user.name’ and ‘user.email’, otherwise they can’t commit anything. You
>> will just have to set
It seems after testing lots of pages this one escaped me since I only
tested the working case.
Please find the quick fix in the link below.
https://pastebin.ubuntu.com/p/s7tWyPHZ8F/
I'm looking forward to making another contribution. Could you please
review it as soon as possible?
Thanks,
Canan
Hi Florian,
(Cc: Chris who’s also familiar with (guix http-client).)
"pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)" skribis:
> It still gets stuck (sometimes with enlightenment, one time with
> udisks, restarting the install fixed it once). After getting stuck,
> this different error message is shown now; no
Canan Talayhan writes:
> It seems after testing lots of pages this one escaped me since I only
> tested the working case.
>
> Please find the quick fix in the link below.
> https://pastebin.ubuntu.com/p/s7tWyPHZ8F/
Great, that fixes the issue with the revision comparison page.
> I'm looking
28 matches
Mail list logo
