Greetings from Guix! [0]
We're having trouble building ilmbase-2.2.0 for the i686 architecture on
Linux, with gcc-4.9.3.
The build process fails during testing. Specifically, it fails
testBoxAlgo, like this:
ImathTest: testBoxAlgo.cpp:892: void {anonymous}::boxMatrixTransform():
Assertion `b21
Hi,
On 12/6/15, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Yes, could you adjust it and send an updated patch?
>
I've attached the new patch here. I've shortened a few lines,
including the one requested.
In particular, I've shortened every line of the description to 70
columns. Because of that, it looks like the
On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 10:17:38PM +0100, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
> Hi Florian,
>
> thanks for the patch!
>
> > From 6dee84494a522921baacbcad8c7618c9eb709eb1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > From: Florian Paul Schmidt
> > Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2015 15:30:14 +0100
> > Subject: [PATCH] swh-plugins-lv2: New v
Ricardo Wurmus writes:
>> +(define-public swh-plugins-lv2
>> + (let ((commit "5098e09e255eaed14e0d40ca5e7e6dfcb782d7ea"))
>
> We usually don’t use full commit hashes. You could probably trim it to
> the first six characters or so.
I would recommend using at least 10 characters, maybe more. We
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> Leo Famulari skribis:
>
>> On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 11:36:46AM +0100, Andreas Enge wrote:
>>> On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 11:14:24AM +0200, Efraim Flashner wrote:
>>> > The impression I got from looking at the build farm thank-yous on the
>>> > website
>>> > w
Leo Famulari skribis:
> On Wed, Dec 02, 2015 at 10:07:23AM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>> David Thompson skribis:
>>
>> > Looking for some feedback on my first stab at making the nginx service
>> > extensible. With this extension mechanism, future web applications
>> > (such as GNU MediaGobl
Leo Famulari skribis:
> On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 11:36:46AM +0100, Andreas Enge wrote:
>> On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 11:14:24AM +0200, Efraim Flashner wrote:
>> > The impression I got from looking at the build farm thank-yous on the
>> > website
>> > was that we have lowered requirements for what we
Alex Kost skribis:
> * gnu/packages/emacs.scm (emacs-w3m): Update to 1.4.538+0.20141022.
> [arguments]: Symlink 'autoloads' to a compiled "w3m-load.elc".
LGTM!
Ludo'.
Alex Kost skribis:
> * gnu/packages/emacs.scm (emacs-w3m)[arguments]: Use 'modify-syntax'.
OK!
Ludo'.
Alex Kost skribis:
> * emacs/guix-emacs.el (guix-emacs-autoloads-regexp): New variable.
> (guix-emacs-find-autoloads-in-directory): Return a list of autoloads
> without extensions.
LGTM.
However, note that autoloads may only be compressed when we know they do
not embed store file names (whi
I was distracted from important stuff and found myself writing a GNOME
updater, brought to you in commit e80c0f8.
Useful, and at the same time scary:
--8<---cut here---start->8---
$ ./pre-inst-env guix refresh -t gnome
gnu/packages/mail.scm:211:13: gmime would
Florian Paul Schmidt writes:
>>> + (alist-cons-after
>>
>> Please use ‘modify-phases’ instead of the ‘alist-*’ stuff.
>
> OK, noted. I think I searched through other packages to come up with this.
>
> fps@cherry ~/src/guix [env]$ grep "#:phases (alist-cons-after"
> gnu/packages/*.scm | wc
On 12/07/2015 10:17 PM, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
Hi Florian,
thanks for the patch!
Hi rekado,
thanks for the feedback :)
The commit message should be:
gnu: Add swh-plugins-lv2.
* gnu/packages/audio.scm (swh-plugins-lv2): New variable.
Oh drats, no more -a -m "lalalala" commits.
Hi Florian,
thanks for the patch!
> From 6dee84494a522921baacbcad8c7618c9eb709eb1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Florian Paul Schmidt
> Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2015 15:30:14 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH] swh-plugins-lv2: New variable
The commit message should be:
gnu: Add swh-plugins-lv2.
* gnu
Yes, I'm aware of the readability issues and it seems that my testing of
protonmail services proofs to me that I should just stick to my old email
provider.
I'll have it fixed in some days.
There was a follow-up email, I'll look into the link provided there and the
info you gave me and see if I
Pushed, thanks!
Andreas
On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 07:54:51PM +0100, Andreas Enge wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 12:54:53PM -0500, anonymiss wrote:
> > I've read https://www.gnu.org/software/guix/manual/html_node/
> > Packaging-Guidelines.html and I am done with the gnunet-gtk.scm, at least as
> > far as I can go without t
* gnu/packages/linux.scm (util-linux)[description]: Give some more
information about the package.
---
gnu/packages/linux.scm | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/linux.scm b/gnu/packages/linux.scm
index 9252ca8..6ffd7e1 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/l
This package's description is too vague. Hopefully, this patch will save
some time for people who are trying to figure what package provides some
software like libuuid, dmesg, agetty, and others.
Leo Famulari (1):
gnu: util-linux: Make description more descriptive.
gnu/packages/linux.scm | 5 +
On Wed, Dec 02, 2015 at 10:07:23AM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> David Thompson skribis:
>
> > Looking for some feedback on my first stab at making the nginx service
> > extensible. With this extension mechanism, future web applications
> > (such as GNU MediaGoblin) that use nginx as a front-e
On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 01:49:18PM -0500, anonymiss wrote:
> I'm sorry for top-posting, my setup is a bit difficult at the moment.
That's too bad, it's difficult to read your messages. You should
probably join us on IRC. We are on #guix on irc.freenode.net. You will
get help more quickly there.
>
On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 02:42:02PM -0500, Leo Famulari wrote:
> - "Util-linux is a random collection of utilities for the Linux kernel.")
> +(description "A diverse collection of Linux kernel utilities. It
> provides
> +dmesg and includes tools for working with filesystems, block devices,
This package's description is too vague. Hopefully, this patch will save
some time for people who are trying to figure what package provides some
software like libuuid, dmesg, agetty, and others.
Leo Famulari (1):
gnu: util-linux: Make description more descriptive.
gnu/packages/linux.scm | 5 +
* gnu/packages/linux.scm (util-linux)[description]: Give some more
information about the package.
---
gnu/packages/linux.scm | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/linux.scm b/gnu/packages/linux.scm
index 9252ca8..a944685 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/l
On Fri, 4 Dec 2015 10:53:42 +0100
Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
> Efraim Flashner writes:
>
> > * gnu/packages/python.scm (python-rauth, python2-rauth): New variables.
> > ---
> > gnu/packages/python.scm | 33 +
> > 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/
On Thu, 3 Dec 2015 16:43:27 +0200
Efraim Flashner wrote:
> * gnu/packages/openstack.scm (python-swiftclient, python2-swiftclient):
> New variables.
> ---
> gnu/packages/openstack.scm | 53
> ++
> 1 file changed, 53 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/gnu
On Fri, 4 Dec 2015 11:00:02 +0100
Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
> Efraim Flashner writes:
>
> > +(define-public python2-functools32
> > + (package
> > +(name "python2-functools32")
> > +(version "3.2.3-2")
> > +(source
> > + (origin
> > +(method url-fetch)
> > +(uri (p
On Fri, 4 Dec 2015 10:57:27 +0100
Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
> Efraim Flashner writes:
>
> > +(define-public git-annex-remote-hubic
> > + (package
> > +(name "git-annex-remote-hubic")
> > +(version "0.3.1")
> > +(source (origin
> > + (method url-fetch)
> > + (u
On Thu, 3 Dec 2015 16:43:29 +0200
Efraim Flashner wrote:
> * gnu/packages/python.scm (python-pyasn1-modules)
> (python2-pyasn1-modules): New variables.
> ---
> gnu/packages/python.scm | 24
> 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/gnu/packages/python.scm b/g
On Thu, 3 Dec 2015 16:43:25 +0200
Efraim Flashner wrote:
> * gnu/packages/openstack.scm (python-keystoneclient)
> (python2-keystoneclient): New variables.
> ---
> gnu/packages/openstack.scm | 73
> +-
> 1 file changed, 72 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
On Thu, 3 Dec 2015 16:43:24 +0200
Efraim Flashner wrote:
> * gnu/packages/python.scm (python-requests): Update to 2.8.1.
> [native-inputs]: Move python-setuptools here.
> [inputs]: Add python-py, python-pytest, python-pytest-cov, python-wheel.
> [arguments]: Enable tests.
> ---
> gnu/packages/p
On Thu, 3 Dec 2015 16:43:26 +0200
Efraim Flashner wrote:
> * gnu/packages/python.scm (python2-futures): New variable.
> ---
> gnu/packages/python.scm | 23 +++
> 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/gnu/packages/python.scm b/gnu/packages/python.scm
> index 8084
On Thu, 3 Dec 2015 16:43:23 +0200
Efraim Flashner wrote:
> * gnu/packages/python.scm (python-wheel, python2-wheel): New variable.
> ---
> gnu/packages/python.scm | 28
> 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/gnu/packages/python.scm b/gnu/packages/python
On Thu, 3 Dec 2015 23:25:26 +0100
Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
> Efraim Flashner writes:
>
> > + (build-system python-build-system)
> > + (inputs
> > + `(("python-coverage" ,python-coverage)
> > + ("python-pytest" ,python-pytest)))
>
> If these Python modules need to be available at runtime
Okay, this makes sense to me.
I'll try if I can make it to test-build (the only part I am not exactly sure of
is which set of modules is needed (this could be solved by just
appending/copying the relevant part of gnunet-gtk into the gnunet.scm), and how
to reproduce
src_configure() {
econf \
--d
On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 12:54:53PM -0500, anonymiss wrote:
> I've read https://www.gnu.org/software/guix/manual/html_node/
> Packaging-Guidelines.html and I am done with the gnunet-gtk.scm, at least as
> far as I can go without testing.
It would be better to add the package to the existing gnunet.
I'm sorry for top-posting, my setup is a bit difficult at the moment.
So: "If you are just testing packages and not GuixSD / system stuff, try `guix
environment --ad-hoc foo`, and maybe also the `--pure` option."
and looking at guix environment --help output, with my file being
/home/user/gnunet
On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 11:36:46AM +0100, Andreas Enge wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 11:14:24AM +0200, Efraim Flashner wrote:
> > The impression I got from looking at the build farm thank-yous on the
> > website
> > was that we have lowered requirements for what we're looking for in armhf
> > b
On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 12:54:53PM -0500, anonymiss wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've read
> https://www.gnu.org/software/guix/manual/html_node/Packaging-Guidelines.html
> and I am done with the gnunet-gtk.scm, at least as far as I can go without
> testing.
> My question is, do I check out the guix.git for
Hi,
I've read
https://www.gnu.org/software/guix/manual/html_node/Packaging-Guidelines.html
and I am done with the gnunet-gtk.scm, at least as far as I can go without
testing.
My question is, do I check out the guix.git for testing the package with
./pre-inst-env guix build $pkg-name --keep-fail
On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 8:22 AM, Thompson, David
wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 6, 2015 at 4:56 PM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>> "Thompson, David" skribis:
>>
>>> On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 3:00 AM, Ricardo Wurmus
>>> wrote:
David Thompson writes:
> Found this little order of operations issue
On Sun, Dec 6, 2015 at 4:56 PM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> "Thompson, David" skribis:
>
>> On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 3:00 AM, Ricardo Wurmus
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> David Thompson writes:
>>>
Found this little order of operations issue when trying to button up the
Transmission service.
>>>
>>> L
On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 11:14:24AM +0200, Efraim Flashner wrote:
> The impression I got from looking at the build farm thank-yous on the website
> was that we have lowered requirements for what we're looking for in armhf
> build machines, at least in terms of RAM. In terms of freedom the Raspberry
The impression I got from looking at the build farm thank-yous on the website
was that we have lowered requirements for what we're looking for in armhf
build machines, at least in terms of RAM. In terms of freedom the Raspberry
Pi 2 isn't great, but in terms of cost its pretty inexpensive. Is this
44 matches
Mail list logo
