Re: Staging

Leo Famulari writes: > There are some patches on the staging branch, including an update to the > time zone database. > > What are the plans for the next week or so? Should we try merging the > staging branch in that timeframe? Yes, let's start this in a few days, when Hydra

Staging

There are some patches on the staging branch, including an update to the time zone database. What are the plans for the next week or so? Should we try merging the staging branch in that timeframe? signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: 02/05: gnu: luajit: Update to 2.1.0-beta3.

Mark, On Fri, 2018-02-09 at 03:43 -0500, Mark H Weaver wrote: > > nckx pushed a commit to branch master > > in repository guix. > > > > commit 906f1b48e20a032c22a164c89f9e8862ab2bec7a > > Author: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice > > Date: Wed Jan 3 09:01:53 2018 +0100 > > > > gnu:

timeout option not honoured (formerly how to handle armhf time-out on package?)

the fix did not work, see https://hydra.gnu.org/build/2513115 est project /tmp/guix-build-ldc-0.17.4.drv-0/build Start 1: build-druntime-ldc-unittest 1/673 Test #1: build-druntime-ldc-unittest . Passed 533.53 sec Start 2: build-druntime-test-runner

Re: glibc 2.26 refuses to run on CentOS 6.8

Hi Ricardo, > Does this work even though the official minimum kernel version for glibc > 2.26 is 3.2.0? I think so, BUT the patchset looks pretty similar to what would happen if you specified the configure flag except for one spot. So maybe Nix found out some ill effects. The most worrying part

Re: [WIP]: localize guix.texi

Le Mon, 19 Feb 2018 23:34:37 +0100, Julien Lepiller a écrit : > Hi, > > here is my first attempt at localizing guix.texi. This patch adds > guix.fr.texi, a localized version of the manual. It uses po4a to > generate the .po file and use that same file to generate the

[WIP]: localize guix.texi

Hi, here is my first attempt at localizing guix.texi. This patch adds guix.fr.texi, a localized version of the manual. It uses po4a to generate the .po file and use that same file to generate the localized manual. I had to include the guix.fr.texi in the commit because it is necessary that it

Re: glibc 2.26 refuses to run on CentOS 6.8

Hi Danny, > Can you try just passing --enable-kernel=2.6.32 to "configure" of glibc > instead? > > It should set the minimal version without any weird patching. Does this work even though the official minimum kernel version for glibc 2.26 is 3.2.0? > But newer glibc has moved a lot of kernel

Re: glibc 2.26 refuses to run on CentOS 6.8

Ricardo Wurmus writes: >> Here’s a patch to graft the glibc to apply the patch to allow the 2.6.32 >> kernel. I’m going to apply this at work now. > > That patch had a couple of problems. Here’s a new version. Sad to hear of your troubles, thanks a lot for posting this. We discovered at Verum

Re: glibc 2.26 refuses to run on CentOS 6.8

Ricardo Wurmus writes: > Ricardo Wurmus writes: > >> Ricardo Wurmus writes: >> >>> The NixOS developers patch glibc to make sure that all software still >>> runs on Linux 2.6.32: >>> >>> >>>

Re: glibc 2.26 refuses to run on CentOS 6.8

Hi Ricardo, sorry to hear about those problems. Can you try just passing --enable-kernel=2.6.32 to "configure" of glibc instead? It should set the minimal version without any weird patching. Our glibc/linux in gnu/packages/base.scm specifies --enable-kernel=3.2.0 which we could modify to

Re: glibc 2.26 refuses to run on CentOS 6.8

Ricardo Wurmus writes: > Ricardo Wurmus writes: > >> The NixOS developers patch glibc to make sure that all software still >> runs on Linux 2.6.32: >> >> >>

Re: glibc 2.26 refuses to run on CentOS 6.8

Ricardo Wurmus writes: > The NixOS developers patch glibc to make sure that all software still > runs on Linux 2.6.32: > > > https://raw.githubusercontent.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/master/pkgs/development/libraries/glibc/allow-kernel-2.6.32.patch > > Can we please

glibc 2.26 refuses to run on CentOS 6.8

Hi Guix, I have a bad day. After the upgrade to glibc 2.26 none of the Guix-installed software runs on the HPC cluster running CentOS 6.8. The glibc 2.26 expects a minimum kernel version of 3.x on x86_64, but CentOS 6.8 only comes with a heavily patched 2.6.32. The NixOS developers patch glibc

[PATCH] database: db-get-builds: Inline output selection.

* src/cuirass/database.scm (db-get-builds): Inline output selection. --- src/cuirass/database.scm | 87 +--- 1 file changed, 83 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/cuirass/database.scm b/src/cuirass/database.scm index 5a4631f..f19ee03 100644

Re: Guix to participate in the Google Summer of Code

Hello Ricardo, Ricardo Wurmus writes: > Hi Alex, > >> I want to be a student this year since this will be my final chance (I >> am graduating this year). I look at the libreplanet page and I think >> only the build daemon project is suitable for me since I don't have >>

[PATCH] database: Simplify 'db-get-builds'.

* src/cuirass/database.scm (db-get-builds): Modify. (db-get-build): Modify. --- src/cuirass/database.scm | 165 --- 1 file changed, 55 insertions(+), 110 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/cuirass/database.scm b/src/cuirass/database.scm index

Re: guix pull fails with test error

Ricardo Wurmus writes: > Ricardo Wurmus writes: > >> Hi Guix, >> >> “guix pull” fails building Guix itself. I don’t have access to the >> test-suite.log. Here’s the output: >> >> --8<---cut

Re: guix pull fails with test error

Ricardo Wurmus writes: > Hi Guix, > > “guix pull” fails building Guix itself. I don’t have access to the > test-suite.log. Here’s the output: > > --8<---cut here---start->8--- > […] > PASS: tests/texlive.scm > FAIL:

Re: Graphically isolating Guix containers with Xpra.

Hi Ludo, I've tried 'guix run' for a little bit and I think it has a lot of potential! One of the problems with guix environment containers is that it can take quite a while to build. 'guix run' could solve that. Adding Xpra to 'guix run' and/or 'guix environment' in some way could definitely be

guix pull fails with test error

Hi Guix, “guix pull” fails building Guix itself. I don’t have access to the test-suite.log. Here’s the output: --8<---cut here---start->8--- […] PASS: tests/texlive.scm FAIL: tests/store.scm […]

Re: Java updates

Gábor Boskovits writes: >> Are there any known big problems that remain to be solved here? >> >> > There are two missing patchests. One for bootstrapping java-asm, and > one that adds ant-junit to packages that needs them. Okay, thanks for the reminder. > One of the