Ludovic Courtès writes:
> With a few exceptions, our blog posts do not have a license, which is
> not great
Good catch, I agree!
Janneke
--
Jan Nieuwenhuizen | GNU LilyPond http://lilypond.org
Freelance IT http://JoyofSource.com | Avatar® http://AvatarAcademy.com
Hi Andrew,
Andrew Tropin writes:
[...]
> Ludovic mentioned someday that nginx-configuration is problematic, but I
> highlighted the generic problems, which are applicable for many other
> guix service configurations.
>
> I discussed some other pros and cons of record-based configurations in
>
On 2022-01-27, Yasuaki Kudo wrote:
> Does Guix really run out of the box in Debian?
>
> I have never tried it but my friend Debian expert friend keeps telling me
> that:
>
> * Just apt-get installing Guix doesn't work
What doesn't work?
The main two issues I'm aware of are...
Issue with "guix
Well I have to tell you I am not too familiar with either Debian or Guix So
with that disclaimer:
- If I remember correctly, Guix in Debian just doesn't work straight away after
apt-get install, meaning enabling of certain Guix services also required?
- He needs to have everything that Guix
Yasuaki Kudo writes:
> Does Guix really run out of the box in Debian?
>
> I have never tried it but my friend Debian expert friend keeps telling me
> that:
>
> * Just apt-get installing Guix doesn't work
How does “apt install guix” not work? There’s an older version of Guix
in Debian.
Does Guix really run out of the box in Debian?
I have never tried it but my friend Debian expert friend keeps telling me that:
* Just apt-get installing Guix doesn't work
* and his really big complaint is evidently he creates "virtual environments"
(short of full-on VMware, I imagine it is an
Sławomir Lach writes:
> Solution is simple:
> 1. Keep older packages in GUIX repo, so developers could request older
> version
> in scripts
Unforunately, it’s really not that simply to keep older packages around.
I’m maintaining packages for a bunch of bioinformatics tools, for
example,
Vagrant Cascadian 写道：
Just for clarity, do you mean the GFDL with a laundry-list of
non-free
anti-features excluded, like the guix manual:
I think that goes without saying, but clarity is good: thanks for
bringing it up.
Invariants would be a deal-breaker for several of us I'm sure,
On 2022-01-26, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> With a few exceptions, our blog posts do not have a license, which is
> not great as it prevents sharing and reuse, at least by those outside
> Guix circles (we discussed it in the past but never got around to fixing
> it).
>
> I’d like us to clarify that,
How does that sound?
Excellent.
Thanks!
T G-R
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hi everyone,
I was granted commit access to the repository [1] one hour ago. I am
signing this mail with the key that will be used to sign commits. My
public key can be found at [2] and [3].
Looking forward to working with all of you.
Vinicius
[1]
Maybe it's road to security hell, but it is also very important for beginners
and developers.
Promote GNU GUIX by add support for installers/some scripts, which detects OS
and install software by package manager based on detection.
It is very hard to keep this kind of scripts fresh, because
Hello,
Ludovic Courtès writes:
> Hello Guix!
>
> With a few exceptions, our blog posts do not have a license, which is
> not great as it prevents sharing and reuse, at least by those outside
> Guix circles (we discussed it in the past but never got around to fixing
> it).
>
> I’d like us to
Hi,
If shepherd is run as root, it assumes it is the init system and reboots
the system. Since shepherd is not just an init system, but can also be
used as a non-init process to manage other daemons, this is probably not
good default behaviour. At the very least, it would be nice to have a
Ludovic Courtès writes:
> With a few exceptions, our blog posts do not have a license, which is
> not great as it prevents sharing and reuse, at least by those outside
> Guix circles (we discussed it in the past but never got around to fixing
> it).
>
> I’d like us to clarify that, with a
Me too.
--
Kinds regards Oliver Propst
https://twitter.com/Opropst
On January 26, 2022 10:24:11 AM GMT+01:00, "Ludovic Courtès"
wrote:
>Hello Guix!
>
>With a few exceptions, our blog posts do not have a license, which is
>not great as it prevents sharing and reuse, at least by those outside
>Guix circles (we discussed it in the past but never got around to
On Wed, Jan 26, 2022 at 10:24:11AM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Hello Guix!
>
> With a few exceptions, our blog posts do not have a license, which is
> not great as it prevents sharing and reuse, at least by those outside
> Guix circles (we discussed it in the past but never got around to
I agree!
On 1/26/22 11:24, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
Hello Guix!
With a few exceptions, our blog posts do not have a license, which is
not great as it prevents sharing and reuse, at least by those outside
Guix circles (we discussed it in the past but never got around to fixing
it).
I’d like us
Hello Guix!
With a few exceptions, our blog posts do not have a license, which is
not great as it prevents sharing and reuse, at least by those outside
Guix circles (we discussed it in the past but never got around to fixing
it).
I’d like us to clarify that, with a footer on blog posts saying
> I have some attention problems, so I don't follow all the patches on
> guix-patches, please CC me for Guix Home related changes if it's
> possible and not very burdening.
I'll make a special search query, which shows all the messages with
"home:" in subject line, so I should be fine on
Am Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 04:11:16PM +0100 schrieb Ludovic Courtès:
> Heh. :-) Done! That should appear on-line soon (you may have to
> reload with Ctrl-F5.)
Thanks, working well! (Except for the sun that has disappeared again...)
Andreas
On 2022-01-24 16:37, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> Andrew Tropin skribis:
>
>>> Making Guix Home part of Guix was and still is a commitment, in
>>> particular the commitment that we’d all be working on one
>>> implementation, that there are no “competitive incompatible
>>>
On 2022-01-21 10:30, Maxime Devos wrote:
> Andrew Tropin schreef op do 20-01-2022 om 16:20 [+0300]:
>> [...]
>>
>> From what I understood from Liliana's and Maxime's replies: I'm not the
>> only one finding the original implementation to be more intuitive and
>> consistent with the rest of Guix
On 2022-01-21 10:30, Maxime Devos wrote:
> Andrew Tropin schreef op do 20-01-2022 om 16:20 [+0300]:
>> [...]
>>
>> From what I understood from Liliana's and Maxime's replies: I'm not the
>> only one finding the original implementation to be more intuitive and
>> consistent with the rest of Guix
25 matches
Mail list logo
