On 2024-03-09 02:41, Simon Tournier wrote:
Hi,
Well, I do not see if there is a reply. If no, sorry! If yes, I am
just adding my own curiosity. :-)
Hello :) This was the first reply.
CC: guix-maintainers and guix-sysadmin
CC: Mark Weaver
On lun., 08 janv. 2024 at 13:19, Jing Luo wrote:
Hi,
Simon Tournier writes:
> Hi,
>
> CC: guix-maintainers
> CC: guix-sysadmin
>
> On lun., 22 janv. 2024 at 19:58, Sharlatan Hellseher
> wrote:
>
>> May I ask someone with admin rights to the build farm to set up
>> go-team branch, please?
>
> What is the status of this request? Is it
On 2024-03-11, John Kehayias wrote:
> On Sunday, March 10th, 2024 at 9:58 PM, Vagrant Cascadian
> wrote:
>> On 2024-03-10, Suhail Singh wrote:
>>
>> > Vagrant Cascadian vagr...@debian.org writes:
>> >
>> > > but "guix pull" does not update the running guix-daemon;
>> >
>> > Just to be clear,
Hello,
I am looking through the [backlog of open patch
submissions](https://issues.guix.gnu.org/search?query=is%3Aopen+tag%3Apatch) to
see if any are actionable on my end. One such patch is [issue 55728 which
updates python-mock](https://issues.guix.gnu.org/55728). Based on the output of
Hi Matt. I would almost want to push your changes, but we still
disagree on some wordings.
Also,
Matt writes:
> I realigned the subject. It was previously changed to "doc: Removing
> much of Binary Installation" which is misleading. The topic is how to
> clarify installation based on
Hi Greg,
On mer., 17 janv. 2024 at 12:17, Greg Hogan wrote:
> What is the preferred process for when a patch review is provided
> (often by a committer) but no response is received from the submitter
> (for many weeks or months)?
>
> Is it appropriate to make the recommended changes and submit
Hi,
On lun., 29 janv. 2024 at 17:44, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> That used to be the case until commit
> 672d3d4a87839b0692c307df0edb66cd16bcbf1a, which enabled colors even when
> ‘INSIDE_EMACS’ is set.
>
> Pierre, do you remember what the rationale was?
I am not Pierre. :-) The context seems:
Hi,
CC: guix-maintainers
CC: guix-sysadmin
On lun., 22 janv. 2024 at 19:58, Sharlatan Hellseher
wrote:
> May I ask someone with admin rights to the build farm to set up
> go-team branch, please?
What is the status of this request? Is it doable? I do not see the
specification on
Hi Antoine,
Reading this blog post:
https://lewo.abesis.fr/posts/nix-build-container-image/
and from my understanding, “guix pack” is currently something similar to
’dockerTools.buildImage’ [1]
On lun., 26 févr. 2024 at 18:33, Simon Tournier
wrote:
> Well, I have not followed on which
Hi,
Well, I do not see if there is a reply. If no, sorry! If yes, I am
just adding my own curiosity. :-)
CC: guix-maintainers and guix-sysadmin
CC: Mark Weaver
On lun., 08 janv. 2024 at 13:19, Jing Luo wrote:
> I am Jing Luo, a new member from the GNU webmaster team. I noticed that
>
On 2024-03-09, 10:42 +0100, Josselin Poiret wrote:
> Of course, I'm known as jpoiret there.
Hi Josselin,
Thanks for the patches , which I've applied and tested as follows.
./pre-inst-env guix build grub
./pre-inst-env guix lint grub
./pre-inst-env guix build --check grub
Everything passed
On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 05:42:20PM -0500, Richard Sent wrote:
> Hi Guix,
>
> There isn't an unversioned symbol for rust-cargo defined or exported by
> the (gnu packages crates-io) module. I think it would be best if an
> unversioned rust-cargo symbol was created that was equal to the highest
>
On Thu, Mar 07, 2024 at 02:09:32PM +, Steve George wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I had a couple of ideas - but would need help from someone to mentor
>
> 1. Moldable development in Guix
> Exploratory REPL experience is one of the hall-marks of 'moldable' systems.
> This shortens the development cycle
13 matches
Mail list logo
