Re: New England Guix Meetup Interest?

On Wed, Feb 7, 2024 at 5:46 PM Juliana Sims wrote: > > Hello everyone, > > Coming off the wonderful experience of meeting up with a bunch of > fellow Guixers (Guixs? Guix? what is our demonym?) in person for the > first time at Guix Days, I would very much like to have similar > experiences more

Re: Why is it acceptable to have digital-ocean-configuration in the Guix?

On Thu, Jan 4, 2024 at 5:34 AM Tomas Volf <~@wolfsden.cz> wrote: > > Greetings, > > I would like to inquire regarding digital-ocean-configuration type used for > provisioning DigitalOcean Droplets. I do not understand why it is acceptable > to > have this type in the source code. Reading the

Re: ActtivityPub and Haunt

Hi Jonathan, On Tue, Sep 19, 2023 at 11:48 AM indieterminacy wrote: > > In wider fediverse news, > > The ActivityPub webpage is getting a rejig: > https://socialhub.activitypub.rocks/t/activitypub-rocks-portal-from-standards-movement-to-grassroots-fedi/3577 > > Im emailing, as within the

Re: Implementing the guix-dameon in Guile

Hey Christopher and Ludovic, First, congrats on the NLnet funding! I've wanted to see this project happen for years so I'm excited to see it finally happening. On Thu, Sep 14, 2023 at 9:30 AM Ludovic Courtès wrote: > > Hi Christopher, > > Christopher Baines skribis: > > > My plan is to focus

Re: Cuirass actors

On Thu, Sep 14, 2023 at 11:31 AM Ludovic Courtès wrote: > > Hi! > > "Thompson, David" skribis: > > > I'm curious to hear more about your inter-process transport needs! > > I’d like to have actors running in separate processes on the same > machine. I wo

Re: Cuirass actors

Hey Ludo, On Wed, Sep 13, 2023 at 5:08 PM Ludovic Courtès wrote: > > With this actor split, one could implement another “builder” backend, > for instance one that talks to a Build Coordinator process. It’s also > obviously close to the programming model encouraged by Goblins, which > should

Re: Swineherd: Guix System container manager

Hey, nice job Ricardo! This looks awesome! On Wed, Sep 13, 2023 at 11:29 AM Katherine Cox-Buday wrote: > > On 9/13/23 3:06 AM, Ricardo Wurmus wrote: > > Hi there, > > > > you know the Shepherd: it is an elegant service manager looking after a > > herd of daemons. Since it can be extended with

Re: Shepherd news + planned feature removal

Hi Ludo, On Tue, Feb 21, 2023 at 5:07 PM Ludovic Courtès wrote: > > Hello Guix! > > I recently pushed an updated and rebased variant of > ‘wip-service-monitor’ in the Shepherd, previously discussed here: > > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2022-06/msg00350.html > > I’m going to

Re: shepherd: prefix output with service names?

Hi Ricardo, On Wed, Dec 14, 2022 at 5:44 AM Ricardo Wurmus wrote: > > What do you think of prefixing every line with the name of the service > that is responsible for it? This way we could probably also > prettify/post-process the output somewhat. I think that's a great idea! - Dave

Re: [EXT] Re: Emacs integration for 'guix shell'

Hey Philip, Just a little update for this old thread. Around the time of your email the Emacs package was modified to enable native compilation. Unfortunately, it made Emacs unusable on my computer which stopped my Emacs experimentation for a bit. I'm past that now, thankfully. On Sat, Oct 1,

Re: emacs-next native compilation failures

Hi Max, On Wed, Oct 12, 2022 at 4:24 AM Max Brieiev wrote: > > Hi, > > Recently, Guix started building Emacs with native compilation. > > I did 'guix pull' few days ago (I hadn't done it for a few months), and > it broke my Emacs. > > The 'guix package -u emacs-next' finished building Emacs

Re: Emacs integration for 'guix shell'

Hi Philip, On Sat, Oct 1, 2022 at 4:22 AM Philip Kaludercic wrote: > > "Thompson, David" writes: > > > Hello all, > > > > I recently wrote a little blog post titled "Guix for development" [0] > > and in it I mentioned using a tool called di

Re: Emacs integration for 'guix shell'

On Mon, Sep 26, 2022 at 10:44 PM Maxim Cournoyer wrote: > > Hi, > > Olivier Dion via "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System > distribution." writes: > > [...] > > > I have the following in my .dir-locals.el for my library libpatch. The > > idea is the same, but without direnv: > > > >

Emacs integration for 'guix shell'

Hello all, I recently wrote a little blog post titled "Guix for development" [0] and in it I mentioned using a tool called direnv and emacs-direnv as a way to integrate 'guix shell' with Emacs. This integration has vastly improved my Emacs experience. I can open a shell buffer and the environment

Re: branch master updated: gnu: gitolite: Wrap programs instead of using propagated inputs.

Okay so I was a little confused because gitolite has no test suite. Turns out this failure is for the system test of the gitolite service that I didn't know existed. I figured out how to run that and reproduced the failure. Despite git-minimal being sufficient for everything I use gitolite for

Re: branch master updated: gnu: gitolite: Wrap programs instead of using propagated inputs.

On Mon, Sep 5, 2022 at 1:22 PM Tobias Geerinckx-Rice wrote: > > Thompson, David 写道： > > Will this build be retried at some point? > > Yes: now ;-) > > (There are no automatic retries.) > > Fresh new errors at > <https://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/1333185/

Re: branch master updated: gnu: gitolite: Wrap programs instead of using propagated inputs.

On Mon, Sep 5, 2022 at 9:01 AM Mathieu Othacehe wrote: > > > Hello David, > > I noticed that the gitolite test is now failing. Any chance it is > related to the recent work on the package? > > https://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/1333185/details Hmm, it built successfully for me and worked when I

Re: [EXT] cloud-init?

Hi Simon, On Fri, Aug 26, 2022 at 4:16 AM Simon Josefsson via Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution. wrote: > > I would like to deploy Guix VM's and in many VM hosting environments, > having cloud-init on the Guix VM image would be useful for configuration > of network

Re: [EXT] Please reply: License of your contributions to the blog at guix.gnu.org

Hi, Sorry, I haven't been paying attention to mailing lists lately. I agree with CC-BY-SA 4.0 and GFDL 1.3+ dual-licensing for my contributions to the Guix blog. - Dave On Mon, Jul 4, 2022 at 9:56 AM Ludovic Courtès wrote: > Hello Danny, David, and Laura! > > I hope this message finds you

Re: [EXT] Re: [EXT] Re: Medium-term road map

On Wed, May 6, 2020 at 3:46 PM Jack Hill wrote: > > > Long story short: Guix need not worry about this. > > I think we may want to do some work in Guix to support this workflow > conveniently. That work could include having a secrets management service, > bootstrapping new hosts for access to the

Re: [EXT] Re: Medium-term road map

On Sat, Apr 25, 2020 at 5:38 PM Jack Hill wrote: > > * Continued development of guix deploy. Figuring out how to deploy secrets > to remote machines would be great. I used to think this was a problem that guix deploy had to deal with but after many years doing devops full-time I no longer think

Re: Ansible and GuixOps questions

Hello Robert, On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 6:57 AM rchar01 wrote: > > Probably many admins / DevOps are heavily using Ansible. I also use this > solution to configure systems and services (on Debian and CentOS). > I would like to transfer infrastructure to the Guix System and some questions >

Re: Guix and FSDG

On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 2:20 PM Raghav Gururajan wrote: > > I completely agree with you. The way you explained, does show that Guix > comply with FSDG. The thing is, the semantics used in current version > of FSDG does not explain things well. That's why I pointed out that > FSDG require

Re: Guix and FSDG

Hi, just a quick note to begin: Please do not cross-post to multiple mailing lists because it tends to cause confusion for everyone reading those lists. I have included only guix-devel in the CC list for this reply. On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 5:02 AM Raghav Gururajan wrote: > > (b) Facilitation of

Re: Joint statement on the GNU Project

Stop sending these incoherent essay length rants to the Guix mailing lists. You've made your point dozens of times. Thanks in advance. - Dave

Re: “Guix Profiles in Practice”

On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 6:57 AM Ludovic Courtès wrote: > > Hello Guix! > > Here’s a new blog post by Pierre Neidhardt entitled “Guix Profiles in > Practice”: > > https://guix.gnu.org/blog/2019/guix-profiles-in-practice/ > > A great discussion on the benefits of manifests and on ways to manage >

Re: "guix deploy" is in git master

On Mon, Jul 8, 2019 at 3:29 PM Ricardo Wurmus wrote: > > Similarly, it would be great if “guix deploy” would continue deploying > other machines in the list even if one of them couldn’t be deployed due > to an error. I have a list of 24 machines and a few of them fail with > the user-homes error

Re: Guix beyond 1.0: let’s have a roadmap!

On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 12:31 PM Ludovic Courtès wrote: > > What do *you* want Guix to address in the future? * Extend 'guix environment' to cover use-cases that people currently use docker-compose for * Improve UX of 'guix environment' by using sane defaults and conventions such as reading from

Re: One-shot Shepherd services

On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 5:38 PM Ludovic Courtès wrote: > > Hello Guix! > > Today I added support for “one-shot” services in the Shepherd: > > > https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/shepherd.git/commit/?id=c121eedfff7a50feddcf08e173d2b0dd807e8804 > > One-shot services start, perform a short

Re: GNU Guix 1.0.0 released

Congrats everyone! What an accomplishment! - Dave

Re: Status update on 1.0

On Fri, Mar 15, 2019 at 10:33 AM Ludovic Courtès wrote: > > Hi, > > Gábor Boskovits skribis: > > > Ludovic Courtès ezt írta (időpont: 2019. márc. 13., Sze, > > 16:21): > >> > >> Hello Guix! > > > >> • IPv6 support in ‘static-networking-service’: as discussed at the > >> Guix Days, we’ll

building "guix deploy"

Hello everyone! Chris Webber and I spent the morning chatting about how we want to approach making "guix deploy" a reality and then started hacking on it in the afternoon. Although we weren't able to complete a working prototype by the end of the day, we were able to get pretty close. We

Re: virtual network interfaces in container

On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 12:55 PM Giovanni Biscuolo wrote: > > Hello devel! > > please is there any wip on implementing virtual network interfaces in > "guix system container"s? Not that I know of. I punted on that when I wrote the container implementation because it's a lot of extra work and

Re: It's time to build "guix deploy"

On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 8:34 AM Christopher Lemmer Webber wrote: > > Thompson, David writes: > > >> Maybe Dave and I can meet up IRL now that we're close enough to each > >> other to chat about it. But I know it's less fun than it used to be for > >> Dave

Re: It's time to build "guix deploy"

Hi Chris, Here we go again, eh? :) On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 8:31 AM Christopher Lemmer Webber wrote: > > Hi, > > This has come up several times. A lot of us want "guix deploy". > Personally, I'm running a variety of Debian servers and one Guix server > and I am terrible at maintaining all of

Re: Guix Days starting in two days!

On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 4:58 AM Ludovic Courtès wrote: > > Hello Guix! > > The Guix Days are starting in two days! \o/ > > We’ll be meeting this Thursday 31st at ICAB¹ at 9:30AM for coffee and > starting at 10AM. > > We’ll update as > needed

Re: Using a CDN or some other mirror?

On Tue, Dec 4, 2018 at 4:15 PM wrote: > > Hartmut Goebel transcribed 771 bytes: > > Am 03.12.2018 um 17:12 schrieb Ludovic Courtès: > > > Thus, I’m thinking about using a similar setup, but hosting the mirror > > > on some Big Corp CDN or similar. > > > > Isn't this a contradiction: Building a

Re: Using a CDN or some other mirror?

On Tue, Dec 4, 2018 at 9:06 AM Ludovic Courtès wrote: > > Hi Hartmut, > > Hartmut Goebel skribis: > > > Am 03.12.2018 um 17:12 schrieb Ludovic Courtès: > >> Thus, I’m thinking about using a similar setup, but hosting the mirror > >> on some Big Corp CDN or similar. > > > > Isn't this a

guile-next package needs new native-search-paths

Hey everyone, First of all: Thanks, Ludo, for the new guile-next package. I tried building it myself but couldn't figure out how to make the test suite pass. There's just one small issue: The native search paths are wrong. They are using the 2.2 search paths currently and thus you can't use it

Re: Have GPGPU support in guix?

On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 11:31 PM, Chris Marusich wrote: > Jonathan Brielmaier writes: > >> On 26/04/2018 10:04, Mark H Weaver wrote: >>> What about firmware? Do we know which AMD Radeon cards, if any, can be >>> used without including nonfree

Re: Preferred blog format - Markdown or SXML?

On Sun, Apr 22, 2018 at 10:22 AM, Adam Massmann wrote: > > Hi, > > Pierre Neidhardt writes: > >> What about Org-mode? >> Rationale: >> >> http://karl-voit.at/2017/09/23/orgmode-as-markup-only > > The website uses the haunt [1] static site generator

[ANN] "Practical, verifiable software freedom with GuixSD" presentation now available

Hello everyone, The FSF has uploaded my talk about Guix from this past weekend's LibrePlanet conference. If you're interested, you can watch it at this URL: https://media.libreplanet.org/u/libreplanet/m/practical-verifiable-software-freedom-with-guixsd/ The slide stream is not incorporated

Re: Guix orchestration notes

Hi Chris, On Sat, Feb 17, 2018 at 11:37 PM, Chris Marusich wrote: > Hi, > > At FOSDEM, some of us discussed "orchestration", which means something > like "how to deploy services to more than 1 machine in a coordinated > fashion". Many people contributed to the discussion.

Re: [orchestration] AWS public cloud images

Hi Mark, On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 4:18 PM, Mark Meyer wrote: > Hi, > I've the beginning of Guix cloud images available over at Github at > > https://github.com/ofosos/guix-packer/ > > There's a small writeup of what has been done and what's still missing over > here: > >

Re: Status of "GuixOps"?

On Sun, Sep 17, 2017 at 2:34 PM, Hartmut Goebel wrote: > Hi, > > in Ludo's presentation at GHM he presented "GuixOps" on a slide. What is > the status of this approach? I'm very interested in trying it out and > contributing. I made a wip-deploy branch years ago

Re: My experiences with GuixSD

Hello Jonathan, On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 6:58 PM, Jonathan Brielmaier wrote: > Hello Guix, > > two weeks ago I got a new desktop computer. I decided to remove the > ubuntu on it and tried to install GuixSD on it. I'm not a > super-linux-crack just an "average" user. > >

Re: The future of 'guix environment'

On Sun, Sep 3, 2017 at 3:15 AM, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote: > Ludovic Courtès writes: > >>> I do use guix.scm for testing `guix build'. Maybe I ma the only one >>> though. It turns out to be very useful to find out whether or not I've >>> done something that borked my package

Re: The future of 'guix environment'

On Fri, Sep 1, 2017 at 7:50 AM, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote: > > One thing I didn't see in your proposal is something like > > guix environment --manifest manifest.scm > > It really bothers me that I can only declaritavely populate/maintain > named profiles. Do you have an idea

Re: The future of 'guix environment'

On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 11:57 PM, Christopher Allan Webber <cweb...@dustycloud.org> wrote: > Thompson, David writes: > >> Ricardo, you are correct that we would lose the ability to use the >> guix.scm file for both 'guix environment' and 'guix build'. In >> pr

Re: The future of 'guix environment'

On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 11:16 AM, Ludovic Courtès <l...@gnu.org> wrote: > Heya, > > "Thompson, David" <dthomps...@worcester.edu> skribis: > >> If you've followed along this far, great! Now here's my list of >> proposed changes: >> >> 1) Ad

Re: The future of 'guix environment'

On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 3:18 AM, Jan Nieuwenhuizen <jann...@gnu.org> wrote: > Thompson, David writes: > >> Hi all, been awhile! > > Hi David! > > Great suggestions all! I use guix environment heavily and like it a > lot. Thanks! >> 4) Make 'guix envir

Re: The future of 'guix environment'

Thanks for the feedback, everyone. I'm going to try to address what everyone has been discussing. 宋文武, I agree with Andreas that making a new command is undesirable and would just lead to confusion. I think a single tool can support the major use cases well. I'd go so far as to say that I will

The future of 'guix environment'

Hi all, been awhile! I wrote the initial version of 'guix environment' almost 2 years ago, and have used it constantly since. It was a great start, but from my own experiences and feedback from others, I have identified a number of areas that need improvement. Fixing them will require breaking

Re: Combining Guix, direnv and Emacs for environment customisation

Hello Christopher, Reviving this old thread, if you don't mind. :) On Sat, May 27, 2017 at 7:31 AM, Christopher Baines wrote: > > In summary, using direnv provides a convinient way to manage different > environments created from Guix. There is now support for using direnv >

Re: [PATCH] update haunt to 0.2.1

Hey Ludo, On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 5:12 PM, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > Catonano skribis: > >> From 015719506600bcb674b1d47398af27c2b4f32d18 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >> From: humanitiesNerd >> Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2017 14:55:12 +0100 >> Subject:

Re: [PATCH] scripts: container: Pass through TERM when calling exec

Hey Christopher, On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 2:24 AM, Christopher Baines wrote: > * guix/scripts/container/exec.scm (guix-container-exec): Capture the value of > the TERM environment variable, and pass it through to the container. This > means some applications now work where

Re: [PATCH] gnu: services: Add redis-service

Hello, On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 2:24 AM, Christopher Baines wrote: > > diff --git a/gnu/services/databases.scm b/gnu/services/databases.scm > index d88c839f7..b6bdd6080 100644 > --- a/gnu/services/databases.scm > +++ b/gnu/services/databases.scm > @@ -35,7 +35,11 @@ >

Re: Emacs-Guix released outside from Guix

Hey Alex, On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 9:48 AM, Alex Kost wrote: > Hello, I've been working on Emacs interface outside from the Guix repo > for some time, I mean I'm not going to maintain it inside Guix, sorry :-( Sorry to hear about this. This move will make it difficult for me

Re: ‘guix copy’

Hi Ludo, On Sat, Dec 31, 2016 at 12:40 PM, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > Hello Guix! :-) > > I’m pleased to announce the last(?) feature of the year: ‘guix copy’! > It copies store items over SSH, pretty much like ‘guix offload’ already > does; documentation below. > > Currently

Re: [PATCH] make nginx service extensible

Hi Julien, On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 3:56 PM, Julien Lepiller wrote: > Hi, > > here are three patches for the nginx service. I finally worked on > them. > > 1. s/vhost/server/ in the web.scm and guix.texi > 2. fix a mistake with the list of names and index. > 3. make the

Re: Graphical Installer - Call for Testing.

Hi John, On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 2:59 AM, John Darrington wrote: > The wip-installer branch is ready for testing and general review. > > This branch provides a curses based graphical interface to the disk > images used for installing GuixSD. It is intended to allow

Re: [PATCH] Creating a docker image with Guix

Hi Ricardo, This is awesome! Just a couple things: 1) The amd64 architecture is hardcoded in the image. Should this instead be set to the current architecture? 2) s/configuratio/configuration/ in the docstring for 'config' in guix/docker.scm Ludovic, Ricardo, anyone else: It might be nice if

[PATCH] gnu: mesa: Enable floating point textures.

With this patch, I'm finally able to run programs that require OpenGL 3.0 when using a Nouveau powered GPU. Floating point textures are disabled by default in Mesa due to patent concerns. I assume that it's okay to include this in Guix because it's similar to how we include lame despite MP3

Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add emacs-lua-mode.

On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 12:52 PM, ng0 wrote: > Hi, > > We already have lua-mode, what is the difference with this one? > > http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git/commit/?id=26e08b4d33918a844a42fd0f859ee640990ca757 The difference is that I didn't notice that package

Redis security fix release 3.2.4 now available

I just pushed an update to our Redis package (commit 5f4194f68728531f09596bb359c58addf86efc5e) to address a security vulnerability which has been out for 16 days: https://github.com/antirez/redis/commit/6d9f8e2462fc2c426d48c941edeb78e5df7d2977 The set of people using Redis provided by Guix

Re: guix environment guix doesn't provide guix dependencies?

On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 5:20 PM, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > Hi Chris, > > Chris Marusich skribis: > >> John Darrington writes: > > [...] > >>> I don't think so. Running ./bootstrap is not part of the normal process >>> for

Re: [PATCH 5/7] gnu: Add kiss-fft-for-extempore.

On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 5:38 AM, Ricardo Wurmus wrote: > * gnu/packages/algebra.scm (kiss-fft-for-extempore): New variable. LGTM. - Dave

Re: [PATCH 6/7] gnu: Add portmidi-for-extempore.

On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 5:38 AM, Ricardo Wurmus wrote: > * gnu/packages/music.scm (portmidi-for-extempore): New variable. > --- > gnu/packages/music.scm | 17 + > 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/gnu/packages/music.scm b/gnu/packages/music.scm

Re: [PATCH 1/7] gnu: Add nanovg-for-extempore.

On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 5:38 AM, Ricardo Wurmus wrote: > * gnu/packages/gl.scm (nanovg-for-extempore): New variable. LGTM. - Dave

Re: [PATCH 4/7] gnu: Add llvm-for-extempore.

On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 5:38 AM, Ricardo Wurmus wrote: > * gnu/packages/llvm.scm (llvm-for-extempore): New variable. > --- > gnu/packages/llvm.scm | 8 > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/gnu/packages/llvm.scm b/gnu/packages/llvm.scm > index

Re: [PATCH 2/7] gnu: Add assimp.

On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 5:38 AM, Ricardo Wurmus wrote: > * gnu/packages/graphics.scm (assimp): New variable. Awesome! Now someone can package guile-assimp. :) LGTM. - Dave

Re: [PATCH 3/7] gnu: Add stb-image-for-extempore.

On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 5:38 AM, Ricardo Wurmus wrote: > * gnu/packages/image.scm (stb-image-for-extempore): New variable. LGTM. - Dave

Re: [PATCH] Adding .xsession to guile-wm

On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 9:23 PM, Alex ter Weele wrote: > I don't believe there is a standard, but different packages do it > different ways. Under my patch, guile-wm will regenerate its .desktop as > part of the build process, so its Exec= should be kept up-to-date. We

Re: [PATCH] Adding .xsession to guile-wm

On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 11:56 AM, Alex ter Weele wrote: > Manually making a .desktop is what xmonad and fluxbox do: > http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git/tree/gnu/packages/wm.scm#n244 > http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git/tree/gnu/packages/wm.scm#n359 > Hence

Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add sonata

On Sun, Sep 11, 2016 at 11:08 AM, Leo Famulari wrote: > On Sun, Sep 11, 2016 at 11:00:37AM +0100, Christopher Baines wrote: >> * gnu/packages/mpd.scm (sonata): New variable. > > Thanks! Pushed as 6c86cef5d36d613be0a62f8f18e276232abf51f0. > > This will make it easier for my

Re: [PATCH] Adding .xsession to guile-wm

On Sun, Sep 11, 2016 at 11:01 PM, Alex ter Weele wrote: > Adding an xsession to guile-wm so that display managers will identify it > as an available wm. I think it would be best if this were submitted as a patch to guile-wm upstream instead, and we can include the patch

Re: [PATCH] services: nginx: Actually check if configuration is valid.

On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 10:21 PM, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <m...@tobias.gr> wrote: > Dave, > > On 09/09/16 04:09, Thompson, David wrote: >> Maybe this could be done at build-time instead? > > The nginx service points to a stateful configuration file, like > /etc/nginx.con

Re: [PATCH] services: nginx: Actually check if configuration is valid.

On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 10:05 PM, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice wrote: > * gnu/services/web.scm (nginx-activation): Fix path to nginx binary. > --- > > Hullo again! > > I suspect not many people run nginx (or dovecot, but that's a different > matter) on Guix. The nginx activation script

Re: GSoC NPM

On Sun, Sep 4, 2016 at 10:11 AM, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote: >* add --binary option to importer, sets (arguments (#:binary? #t)) This violates a core principle of Guix: reproducible builds. I don't support patches that encourage using pre-built binaries. > As a first

Re: GSoC NPM

On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 10:24 AM, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote: > Also, I found that you prefer going through the repository/github > instead of using the dist tarball. Why is that? The tarballs distributed by NPM are considered binaries, not source. - Dave

Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add Infernal.

On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 9:35 AM, Ricardo Wurmus wrote: > * gnu/packages/bioinformatics.scm (infernal): New variable. > --- > gnu/packages/bioinformatics.scm | 27 +++ > 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+) > > diff --git

Re: Building for Android and F-Droid

On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 7:33 AM, Hartmut Goebel wrote: > Hello, > > I just want to share an idea I had: > > Recently I was involved in packaging a app for f-droid. The f-droid build > system consists of 1) a virtual machine which get cleaned up after each > build. and

Re: screenshot of the web interface to the GNU Guix package manager

On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 9:56 AM, ng0 wrote: > Ricardo Wurmus writes: > >> knx...@onionmail.info writes: >> >>> On https://git.dthompson.us/guix-web.git/blob/HEAD:/README.md >>> >>> there is a dead link to >>>

Re: screenshot of the web interface to the GNU Guix package manager

On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 9:45 AM, wrote: > On https://git.dthompson.us/guix-web.git/blob/HEAD:/README.md > > there is a dead link to > http://media.dthompson.us/mgoblin_media/media_entries/20/Screenshot_from_2014-08-13_180724.png Sorry about that, my MediaGoblin server is

Re: [PATCH] gnu: node: Update to 6.4.0.

On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 1:55 PM, Jelle Licht wrote: > > This patch builds reproducible, although that was also the case for me > with the previous Node 6.3.1. patch. It would be great if someone could > verify this. > > This patch supercedes the 'gnu: node: Update to 6.3.1.'

Re: [PATCH v2 2/6] gnu: fpga: Add abc.

diff --git a/gnu/packages/fpga.scm b/gnu/packages/fpga.scm index 112d53b..7571f87 100644 --- a/gnu/packages/fpga.scm +++ b/gnu/packages/fpga.scm @@ -38,3 +38,46 @@ #:use-module (gnu packages version-control) #:use-module (gnu packages libftdi)) +;; To compile as C code (default): +;; make

Re: [PATCH v2 1/6] gnu: Add fpga module.

On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 2:06 PM, Danny Milosavljevic wrote: > > * gnu/packages/fpga.scm: New file. > --- > gnu/local.mk | 1 + > gnu/packages/fpga.scm | 40 > 2 files changed, 41 insertions(+) > create mode 100644

Re: [PATCH v2 3/6] gnu: fpga: Add iverilog.

diff --git a/gnu/packages/fpga.scm b/gnu/packages/fpga.scm index 7571f87..b0d4819 100644 --- a/gnu/packages/fpga.scm +++ b/gnu/packages/fpga.scm @@ -81,3 +81,30 @@ and formal verification.") ;; FIXME use license: MIT Modern variant as described in: ;;

Re: Specifying Java version when using ant-build-system

On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 10:17 AM, Danny Milosavljevic wrote: > Hi, > > how can I specify that I need a Java 1.8 compiler and source level when using > ant-build-system? > > Also, guix/build-system/ant.scm says: > > (define* (ant-build store name inputs >

Re: [PATCH 2/5] gnu: Add avr-gcc.

On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 7:59 AM, Danny Milosavljevic wrote: > What does the search-paths form do? Does it set environment variables in the > profile as well? Search path information is used in build environments (guix build), user-defined environments (guix

Re: [PATCH] ui: 'package->recutils' serializes the source field.

On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 9:42 AM, Ricardo Wurmus wrote: > > Ben Woodcroft writes: > >> On 10/08/16 22:27, David Craven wrote: I don't have anything to to contribute beyond psuedo-quoting Ludo: let's not lose our hair over this! >>> I'll let

Re: [PATCH 2/5] gnu: Add avr-gcc.

On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 3:52 AM, Ricardo Wurmus wrote: > > Maybe Dave knows more about this? I haven't had time to look into anything, but last I checked I was able to successfully compile the firmware I'm interested in with avr-toolchain. - Dave

Re: Adding ruby-rails and ruby-sinatra.

On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 8:11 AM, Ben Woodcroft wrote: > Hi all, > > I am quite happy to announce that we are almost on rails. There's a new > branch 'wip-rails' on savannah with a new file 'gnu/packages/rails-wip.scm', > which includes ~100 ruby packages towards rails and

Re: [PATCH v2] gnu: node: Update to 6.3.1.

On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 9:13 AM, Jelle Licht wrote: > > Attached you will find the updated version of this patch. Please let me > know what you think. I could point out a few nits about the commit message, but I think someone with commit access should just clean it up and push.

Re: [PATCH] gnu: red-eclipse: Update to 1.5.5.

On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 9:03 AM, Kei Kebreau wrote: > > An important version bump for Red Eclipse, with necessary changes to > keep it building properly. I've also included the example server > configuration file in the config directory. LGTM. I really need to try this game

Re: 'guix environment' as a build tool.

On Sun, Jul 31, 2016 at 9:55 AM, Ludovic Courtès <l...@gnu.org> wrote: > Hello! > > "Thompson, David" <dthomps...@worcester.edu> skribis: > >> On Sat, Jul 30, 2016 at 10:05 PM, Mathieu Lirzin <m...@gnu.org> wrote: >>> l...@gnu.org (Ludovic

Re: 'guix environment' as a build tool. (was: [GSoC] Continuous integration tool à la Hydra.)

On Sat, Jul 30, 2016 at 10:05 PM, Mathieu Lirzin wrote: > l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes: > >> Mathieu Lirzin skribis: >> >>> I have tested successfully with the following command on a foreign >>> system: >>> >>> guix environment --ad-hoc automake pkg-config

Re: [PATCH] gnu: password-store: Wrap PATH.

On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 5:07 AM, Mathieu Lirzin wrote: > Hello, > > Alex Griffin writes: > >> On Thu, Jul 28, 2016, at 07:20 PM, Alex Griffin wrote: >> >> From 74b838fea52293386169299881cdd7cfefff7f4d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >> From: Alex Griffin

Re: Ricardo Wurmus appointed co-maintainer

On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 6:27 AM, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > Hello Guix! > > I’m happy to announce that Ricardo Wurmus has just been appointed by the > GNU overseers to join me as co-maintainer of GNU Guix. Congrats Ricardo! I can think of no one better for the job. :) - Dave

Re: [PATCH] gnu: fish: Update to 2.3.1.

On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 3:01 AM, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice wrote: > * gnu/packages/fish.scm (fish): Update to 2.3.1. > [home-page, source]: Use 'https' in the URL. LGTM. Do you have commit access? - Dave

  1   2   3   4   5   >