On Sun, 12 Jan 2020 00:39:55 +0100
Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> The “or any later version” wording is present in source file headers,
> so it’s definitely ‘gpl2+’, not ‘gpl2’.
Right, that's what I was supposed to say, but my brain removed the "+".
> I fixed this one and a couple of
Hi,
Jan skribis:
> Don't know if this is a good place, but gnome-color-manager in this
> commit:
> https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git/commit/?id=29ae18db0578bbdbc0119703f7412fe91927e80e
> has GPL2 license in the "license" field and the COPYING file also tells
> the license is GPL2, but
Don't know if this is a good place, but gnome-color-manager in this
commit:
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git/commit/?id=29ae18db0578bbdbc0119703f7412fe91927e80e
has GPL2 license in the "license" field and the COPYING file also tells
the license is GPL2, but if you check a random source
> Yes! I don't think I'm alone in frustration over unnecessary packages
> installed systemwide.
:-)
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Wed, 8 Jan 2020 12:40:52 +0200
Efraim Flashner wrote:
>
> For better or worse Gnome is the dominant desktop in the GNU/Linux
> market space and we do have it packaged and offer it as part of our
> default desktop example. Furthermore Raghav has already been working
> on making Gnome better
On Wed, 08 Jan 2020 07:06:26 +
"Raghav Gururajan" wrote:
> Hello Jan!
>
> Yeah, I am too disappointed by some or half of the things they
> incorporated into the project. The thing is, I want to bring more
> newcomers of GNU+Linux System into Guix. I would like to see Guix
> being deployed
On Tue, 2020-01-07 at 11:32 +, Raghav Gururajan wrote:
> Hello Guix Folks!
>
> I would like to contribute to Guix via Outreachy program. Based on
> domains listed in http://guix.gnu.org/contribute, I would like to
> work on "Packages".
>
> After brief discussion with Tobias (nckx) on IRC, I
On Tue, Jan 07, 2020 at 07:06:58PM +0100, Jan wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Tue, 07 Jan 2020 11:32:10 +
> "Raghav Gururajan" wrote:
>
> > Hello Guix Folks!
> >
> > 1) Improve GNOME Software Stack and GNOME Desktop Environment's
> > user-experience in Guix.
> >
> In my opinion we should stay away
Oh, I forgot mention something in my previous reply.
One more reason I lean towards GNOME over KDE is because of GNOME Human
Interface Guidelines.
1) Cognitive Ergonomics (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cognitive_ergonomics)
2) Human-Computer Interaction
Hello Jan!
> In my opinion we should stay away from GNOME, because it is a Red Hat
> project, rather than GNU now. More than this, GNOME makes some bad for
> user freedom decisions, for example they promote nonfree software in
> their "Software" application. They also promote nonfree services
Hi!
On Tue, 07 Jan 2020 11:32:10 +
"Raghav Gururajan" wrote:
> Hello Guix Folks!
>
> 1) Improve GNOME Software Stack and GNOME Desktop Environment's
> user-experience in Guix.
>
In my opinion we should stay away from GNOME, because it is a Red Hat
project, rather than GNU now. More than
Hello Guix Folks!
I would like to contribute to Guix via Outreachy program. Based on domains
listed in http://guix.gnu.org/contribute, I would like to work on "Packages".
After brief discussion with Tobias (nckx) on IRC, I came up with following
ideas.
1) Improve GNOME Software Stack and
Hello Guix Folks! I would like to contribute to Guix via Outreachy program.
Based on domains listed in http://guix.gnu.org/contribute
(http://guix.gnu.org/contribute/), I would like to work on "Packages". After
brief discussion with Tobias (nckx) on IRC, I came up with following ideas. 1)
13 matches
Mail list logo
