ng0 writes:
> For "historic" reasons this also bundles mkpasswd to encrypt passwords.
> I don't want to unbundle this right now, this should be a job for upstream.
Should we provide the "mkpasswd" binary in its own output?
I will submit a small patch.
> PPoint is: A whois client for guix. We h
ng0 writes:
> * gnu/packages/networking.scm (whois): New variable.
I pushed the updated version of this as
9c798f9036d2d3f90e567052efb06b269c08ed14 with a minor modification to
the description.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Marius Bakke writes:
> ng0 writes:
>
>> Marius Bakke writes:
>>
>>> ng0 writes:
>>>
>>>
I have my uclibc-ng system not booted: When I specify libiconv in the
inputs, shouldn't it get reported by ldd?
ng0@shadowwalker
/gnu/store/fkkvgiqa0x01j6cxipddmn7k20hax1xn-whois-5
ng0 writes:
> Marius Bakke writes:
>
>> ng0 writes:
>>
>>
>>> I have my uclibc-ng system not booted: When I specify libiconv in the
>>> inputs, shouldn't it get reported by ldd?
>>>
>>> ng0@shadowwalker
>>> /gnu/store/fkkvgiqa0x01j6cxipddmn7k20hax1xn-whois-5.2.12/bin$ ls
>>> mkpasswd whois
>>
Marius Bakke writes:
> ng0 writes:
>
>
>> I have my uclibc-ng system not booted: When I specify libiconv in the
>> inputs, shouldn't it get reported by ldd?
>>
>> ng0@shadowwalker
>> /gnu/store/fkkvgiqa0x01j6cxipddmn7k20hax1xn-whois-5.2.12/bin$ ls
>> mkpasswd whois
>> ng0@shadowwalker
>> /gnu
ng0 writes:
> I have my uclibc-ng system not booted: When I specify libiconv in the
> inputs, shouldn't it get reported by ldd?
>
> ng0@shadowwalker
> /gnu/store/fkkvgiqa0x01j6cxipddmn7k20hax1xn-whois-5.2.12/bin$ ls
> mkpasswd whois
> ng0@shadowwalker
> /gnu/store/fkkvgiqa0x01j6cxipddmn7k20ha
ng0 writes:
> Marius Bakke writes:
>
>> ng0 writes:
>>
>>> * gnu/packages/networking.scm (whois): New variable.
>>
>> Thanks! This works for me. I have a couple of remarks that can be added
>> before committing if you agree, no need to send an updated patch.
>>
>> * The source headers seems to
Marius Bakke writes:
> ng0 writes:
>
>>> * The Debian package is built with HAVE_ICONV=1, should we set that too?
>>
>> I can send an updated patch with libiconv in the inputs. This is when
>> you use a libc which does not provide a (usable) iconv, which is why
>> Gentoo provides the option to b
ng0 writes:
>> * The Debian package is built with HAVE_ICONV=1, should we set that too?
>
> I can send an updated patch with libiconv in the inputs. This is when
> you use a libc which does not provide a (usable) iconv, which is why
> Gentoo provides the option to build it with this too. As we ar
Marius Bakke writes:
> ng0 writes:
>
>> * gnu/packages/networking.scm (whois): New variable.
>
> Thanks! This works for me. I have a couple of remarks that can be added
> before committing if you agree, no need to send an updated patch.
>
> * The source headers seems to indicate that this is GPL
ng0 writes:
> * gnu/packages/networking.scm (whois): New variable.
Thanks! This works for me. I have a couple of remarks that can be added
before committing if you agree, no need to send an updated patch.
* The source headers seems to indicate that this is GPL2+.
* The only reference to this pr
11 matches
Mail list logo