Indeed, you're right: I no longer need it. But I decided to test it so
that people can make use of the patch you suggested.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Adonay Felipe Nogueira skribis:
> I have good news: The patch suggested by Ludovic does work. :)
>
> I did a test with a simple recipe (because I no longer need to deal with
> zipbomb itself, since I found the tar.gz generated by their repository,
> which luckly isn't a
Thank you very much! :)
I have good news: The patch suggested by Ludovic does work. :)
I did a test with a simple recipe (because I no longer need to deal with
zipbomb itself, since I found the tar.gz generated by their repository,
which luckly isn't a tarbomb).
Now, reverting the patch with
On Sat, Oct 15, 2016 at 05:47:01PM -0300, Adonay Felipe Nogueira wrote:
> Note: I'm using Guix with other distribution, not GuixSD.
>
> I was trying to find out what is the "working tree" in my case, and I
> decided to investigate "/gnu/store", and I found three possible places
> that are
Note: I'm using Guix with other distribution, not GuixSD.
I was trying to find out what is the "working tree" in my case, and I
decided to investigate "/gnu/store", and I found three possible places
that are directories:
/gnu/store/...-guix-0.11.0-1.4420
/gnu/store/...-guix-latest
Hi,
Adonay Felipe Nogueira skribis:
> Sorry for taking so long to answer.
>
> How do I use the patch in the source file?
>
> It seems to refer to some Guix internal, not a package definition.
Right, what I posted is a patch for Guix. You can store it in a file
and
Also, I forgot to tell: I found their Git repository, and that offers
the source files in a directory inside a compressed file.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
I removed the snippet and tried replacing the unpack phase, and that did
worked around the problem.
Also, I found their Git repository, and that offers the source files in
a directory inside a compressed file.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Sorry for taking so long to answer.
How do I use the patch in the source file?
It seems to refer to some Guix internal, not a package definition.
Meanwhile, I'll try to take the patch's content and apply it directly to
the recipe (although my knowledge is very limited).
signature.asc
Hello!
Adonay Felipe Nogueira skribis:
> Archive: /gnu/store/52v106n4y88myk2c8nykymfidq6080ws-cryptopp-5.6.4.zip
> inflating: 3way.cpp
> inflating: 3way.h
[...]
>?: 0 [chdir "3way.cpp"]
>
> ERROR: In procedure chdir:
> ERROR:
Hi,
On 09/23/2016 12:49 AM, Adonay Felipe Nogueira wrote:
I tried your suggestions, and the unpack phase doesn't seem to be
working as expected. Inspecting **all** the directories created with
--keep-failed shows that the "source" directory wasn't made.
I believe the problem now is the snippet,
I tried your suggestions, and the unpack phase doesn't seem to be
working as expected. Inspecting **all** the directories created with
--keep-failed shows that the "source" directory wasn't made.
In attachment are the new recipes that I'm using and also the `guix
build` log.
;;; GNU Guix ---
On 09/22/2016 11:18 AM, Ben Woodcroft wrote:
Welcome Adoney,
Also, I forgot to say, make sure to remove the "-mtune=native" flag from
the gcc calls, and there is no need to set 'gcc' as an input if you are
using the gnu-build-system.
ben
Welcome Adoney,
On 09/22/2016 01:24 AM, Adonay Felipe Nogueira wrote:
[..]
Doing:
$ guix build --fallback "cryptopp"
... outputs:
# Begin of output
starting phase `build'
make: *** No rule to make target 'dynamic'. Stop.
phase `build' failed after 0.2 seconds
builder for
Note: I'm not a programmer, the only thing I can understand is basic
Guile Scheme and basic Bash scripting. So, I'm not really fit to make
changes in the Crypto++'s source files by myself.
I'm writing a recipe for Crypto++ and other packages. I'm not a
programmer, but I decided to try to
15 matches
Mail list logo