Re: [h-cost] Butterick 5832

2012-12-17 Thread Marjorie Wilser
Thoughts: not as early as 1837, because earlier sleeve fullness fell to the elbow and only later (42-3) disappeared; wider bertha looks better to me, but my reading suggests somewhere in between for depth. Note collection below shows an asymmetric bertha in one view. Not quite as

Re: [h-cost] Butterick 5832

2012-12-17 Thread Sharon Collier
It looks as if someone tried to make a pattern based on the dress from July 1839, (pink, in upper left corner), but mis-interpreted the drawing and made it asymmetrical. Sharon C. -Original Message- From: h-costume-boun...@indra.com [mailto:h-costume-boun...@indra.com] On Behalf Of

Re: [h-cost] Butterick 5832

2012-12-17 Thread humbugfoto1
Thanks for the help. I'm also wondering about two small details on this pattern. It's designed to close with hooks and eyes (wonder of wonders, NOT a zipper) but I wonder if lacing might be more appropriate to the time period (1840). Also, the sleeves end with a slit (at least 3-4 inches)

Re: [h-cost] Butterick 5832

2012-12-17 Thread Catherine Olanich Raymond
On 12/17/2012 07:58 PM, humbugfo...@att.net wrote: Thanks for the help. I'm also wondering about two small details on this pattern. It's designed to close with hooks and eyes (wonder of wonders, NOT a zipper) but I wonder if lacing might be more appropriate to the time period (1840). Also, the