Re: [h-cost] Where is everyone hanging out these days?

2011-08-08 Thread Michael Deibert
I joined sometime last year. The only way I found out about this list, is
from the search result regarding the Gothic Fitted Gown. I've my degree in
Theater, with focus in theatrical costuming. However, I am very interested
in the historical aspect of things - why things were worn as such, how they
were sewn, what did they wear underneath everything to give the right shape,
etc. Even for my designs, I always prefer to go the historical route versus
the theatrical route. Not always possible, but I at least make good
arguements for doing so. I also have projects I'm working on on the side,
those I focus on the historical point of things. I enjoy this list because,
as many others have pointed out, it is a general list not specific to eras.
Any question I have can usually be answered. I also do not have the time to
read all the blogs or lists out there so I must simplify things and go with
this one.

Michael

On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 3:03 PM, Beteena Paradise bete...@mostlymedieval.com
 wrote:

 I joined sometime between 2002 and 2003 because I was living in Atlanta at
 the
 time. Does anyone else mark time by where they lived? Gotta love the army!
 Anyway, I don't remember where I heard about this list. I just remember
 that it
 had something to do with Robin Netherton. I don't know if she mentioned it
 somewhere or it came up doing an internet search for research. I took a
 costuming hiatus for a couple of years around 2005 so didn't really pay
 much
 attention to posts on this list. It goes to its own folder so sometimes I
 just
 let them accumulate. But every so often I would go back to reading
 regularly.

 Teena


 On Mon, 8 Aug 2011 01:08:13 -0400 penn...@costumegallery.com writes:
  So here are the questions...how did you find the h-costume email
  list?  And
  what year did you join?  It will be really interesting how the
  newbies have
  found it.
 
  I found it as one of two costume email lists in 1996 on AOL.
 
  Penny Ladnier, owner
  The Costume Gallery Websites
  www.costumegallery.com
  15 websites of fashion, costume, and textile history
  FaceBook:
 
 http://www.facebook.com/pages/The-Costume-Gallery-Websites/10749841596157
 9
 
 
  ___
  h-costume mailing list
  h-costume@mail.indra.com
  http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume
 
 

 ___
 h-costume mailing list
 h-costume@mail.indra.com
 http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume
 ___
 h-costume mailing list
 h-costume@mail.indra.com
 http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume

___
h-costume mailing list
h-costume@mail.indra.com
http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume


Re: [h-cost] Corset patterns and research questions

2011-03-25 Thread Michael Deibert
I hope I'm not asking for too much, but could we perhaps have some
references - for both viewpoints. Perhaps it's just a simple confusion or
misunderstanding? And perhaps both could be right. But until we have
references to either or both if that be the case, I'd like to avoid being
the start of an arguement on here!

Michael Deibert
OAS AAS LLS

On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 12:50 PM, albert...@aol.com wrote:

 The spoon busk was quite before the 19th C. so it
 wouldn't be considered for the Victorian period anyway.
 ***
 The spoon busk is almost exclusively 1870s... so it is VERY victorian.
 _
 h-costume mailing list
 h-costume@mail.indra.com
 http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume

___
h-costume mailing list
h-costume@mail.indra.com
http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume


Re: [h-cost] Corset patterns and research questions

2011-03-25 Thread Michael Deibert
Fran

I was actually referencing to the issue of when spoon busks were in style
- but those links are still great! I was unaware of the first three!

While there can be many good links through The Costumer's Manifesto, there
are also some not so great ones, in addition to stores. It just takes longer
to sort though sometimes.

Michael
OAS AAS LLS

On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 1:44 PM, Lavolta Press f...@lavoltapress.comwrote:



 On 3/25/2011 10:04 AM, Michael Deibert wrote:

 I hope I'm not asking for too much, but could we perhaps have some
 references - for both viewpoints.


 I agree that research in books and other publications is where you should
 start. Here are three different bibliographies:

 http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Corset/Bibliography/Old_English

 http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Corset/Bibliography/English

 http://www.calectasia.com/Bibliography.php

 and a long set of corset links:

 http://costumes.org/history/100pages/corsetlinks.htm

 You can find more with a net search. These are just the first few I brought
 up in a casual search.


 Fran
 Lavolta Press
 Books of historic clothing patterns
 www.lavoltapress.com






 ___
 h-costume mailing list
 h-costume@mail.indra.com
 http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume

___
h-costume mailing list
h-costume@mail.indra.com
http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume


[h-cost] Corset patterns and research questions

2011-03-24 Thread Michael Deibert
Good morning everyone!

I'm doing some research into corsets, and thought it best to start on here
where many of you already have research. While I know a lot regarding
corsets, I have two main focuses.

The first is regarding corset patterns. I am hoping to develop a corset
pattern and thus would like to be able to have as many corset patterns to
base it off of as I can. While any corset pattern works, I am specifically
hoping to find Victorian era corset patterns with hip and/or bust gores.
From the many companies out there currently selling commercial pattersn,
there are few who focus on corsets with gores. I am looking at trying to
simplify the process of grading for different sizes, and believe that there
might be a way to accomplish this with gored patterns. So if any of you have
or know of patterns that I can get, please direct me in that direction!
(Remember copyright laws and direct me to where I can find things, rather
than just copy and paste.)

Second, the little research I've done so far indicates that during the
Victorian eras, there were many corset patterns that used gores - yet many
of the current commercial patterns focus on those without. Is there a reason
for this that anyone might be aware of? Is it easier to fit without gores?
Are gored patterns more difficult to make up? Any help in this direction is
also a huge plus!

Please don't shy away, the more I can accumulate, the better my final
pattern shall be once it is ready! Thanks in advance!

Michael Deibert
___
h-costume mailing list
h-costume@mail.indra.com
http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume


Re: [h-cost] Corset patterns and research questions

2011-03-24 Thread Michael Deibert
All of these are great ideas, great tidbits of advice, and have given me
plenty of things to ponder! But perhaps I need to clarify a few things so we
don't get too far off track, or just keep re-itterating the same things over
and over.

First, I'm only on the preliminary research steps, nowhere near even
drafting out a pattern let alone going beyond. I have my concept, and while
it is rather unique and new (from what I can tell so far, that is) - it is
focused more on fitting the modern woman's measurements and shape than it is
on style. It's not new in the concept, however the use of that concept might
be. (Sorry if that's vague!) Because the corset is a historical garment, one
that completely fascinates me as well, I will do all that I can to
incorporate the history into the design.

In terms of style, period, decade, etc - I say that I want a Victorian
style, in comparison to Tudor/Elizabethan or 18th century stays (completely
drastic styles and ones that unfortunately won't work with my concept at
this time.) Which decade or specific look within Victorian eras? That, I
honestly do not know! I have general sketches in my mind but as far as
settling on a specific decade, I need much more research. Everything right
now is general and broad - I'm trying to amass as much information as I can
in order to create the best style and design that 1) works with my overall
concept, 2) is marketable, and 3) sells.

Concept: Without giving anything away, I will be using both hip and bust
gores. Yes, it would be more challenging to make up, but for the overall
goals of fitting the modern woman, I believe the extra effort will be worth
it. (I can easily be wrong, but only trial and error may tell!)

Marketability: My ideal market is a bridge between the historical
re-enactors and fashion. After all, the past influences the future. If,
however, once I have the pattern worked out, and start testing it and making
some test corsets, they end up appealing more to the fantasy/renaissance, or
even goth scenes then I will adapt and start marketing to them instead
because one of the goals is to make a return on my investment if possible. I
also accept that I will probably alienate some people simply because of the
style, and some perhaps because of the concept itself. But if the first
design is successful, then I can adapt and hopefully add additional styles
that would bring those people back into play.

Lastly, to touch on the issue you bring up with gores and fit vs shaping the
body. It is a valid point, and will definitely be a fine line (if one even
exists) that I will have to decide. While I agree that the corset shapes the
body and provides the support, you can't squeeze a women who wears a DD bra
into a corset designed for a woman with an A cup - even if all their other
measurements are the same. Or perhaps it is and my concept might have to be
thrown out. My research and trials (along with help from those of you who've
gone through this or are familiar with the concepts, etc), will ultimately
decide where things go.

Sorry if I repeated things I've already mentioned - I'm trying to clear up
any misunderstandings and establish better grounds to continue. And I do
promise, I will TRY to keep emails short as well!

Michael Deibert
OAS AAS LLS
___
h-costume mailing list
h-costume@mail.indra.com
http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume


Re: [h-cost] Corset patterns and research questions

2011-03-24 Thread Michael Deibert
Thank you Fran, for that reminder and clarification. While I very well could
work out a licensing agreement to use a current corset pattern, I'm still
leaning towards going back to the primary sources to develope one. Yes, I
could easily be wasting my time in the end, but because the concept is
unique, I think it's best to at least start that route.

I'm also keeping long-term goals in mind. If I started off using another
company's pattern to make corsets and sell them, what happens when I want to
branch out into a different style? I would either have to start completley
new then so I can call it my own, or use another company's pattern. How soon
do you just become a maker of one company? I would rather have things by my
work, patterns that I can work to fit other styles and perhaps even eras.
And perhaps I'm just stubborn and need to try it my way first - If that's
the case, then I fully accept any and all warnings that I was foolish to
insist upon re-inventing the wheel. (sorry if my attempt at humor doesn't
get across as intended!)

But definitely thanks for that reminder!

Michael Deibert
OAS AAS LLS

On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 1:33 PM, Lavolta Press f...@lavoltapress.comwrote:


  The Laughing Moon one is the only corset pattern Ive used with gores,
 but since I started with fantasy corsets, I haven't used many historical
 patterns,i nstead I've developed my own and modified others for myself.


 I'm not sure a see a need for a Victorian corset pattern people would call
 generic (even though it's not). A number of them are already on the
 market. Re copyright issues:

 What is copyrighted is the pattern, illustrations, and instructions.
 Whether a company restricts if the pattern can be used for garments made for
 sale, and if so how many garments and under what circumstances, is a
 licensing issue. Getting a license is a question of formally asking
 permission and possibly, paying for it. Also, of getting consent in writing
 with a signature.  I think Butterick/Simplicity/Vogue and McCall's require
 licenses. With smaller companies the issue varies.

 What I am getting at is, if you like a Laughing Moon or Past Patterns
 corset pattern (Past Patterns has published several excellent corset
 patterns), I suggest contacting the company, saying you want to make
 garments for sale, and asking if that is acceptable to them. If they say
 yes, you have saved yourself a lot of trouble.

 Fran
 Lavolta Press
 Books of historic clothing patterns
 www.lavoltapress.com

 ___
 h-costume mailing list
 h-costume@mail.indra.com
 http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume

___
h-costume mailing list
h-costume@mail.indra.com
http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume


Re: [h-cost] Authenticity

2011-03-14 Thread Michael Deibert
Why must they be nasty arguements? While it's unfortunate some people react
that way, if there are valid arguements to be made which can be supported
through either research or even experience, and we can remain civil - isn't
that what constitutes a good discussion?

Perhaps, if that topic is buried in the old archives, it would be worth
reviving. After all, new research has been made, perhaps new technology. And
there are new members on this list - that equals new viewpoints.

Lastly, why would people unsubscribe just because others on the list are
reviving a topic that not only is of interest to them, but is one of the key
reasons this list exists? All they have to do is delete those emails if they
don't want to participate. There have been several posts on here that either
do not interest me, or are specific questions that I cannot add input on -
so I read them, and archive or delete the email. Simple as that.

And I think I might have to get my hands on a copy of that book!

Michael

On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 2:57 PM, Cin cinbar...@gmail.com wrote:

 Carol,
 We dont discuss the Great Authenticity Issue on this list anymore.
 All the nasty arguments  bitter recriminations have been made.  Find
 the old fights in the archives.  Discuss it  you'll see a wave of
 unsubscribes.
 --cin
 Cynthia Barnes
 cinbar...@gmail.com



 On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 2:08 PM, Carol Kocian aqua...@patriot.net wrote:
  - Where do we draw the line between what is acceptable as historically
  accurate vs historically authentic?
 
  - With modern sewing skills and fads (such as zippers), where do we
  encorporate those skills to aid in construction of period garments, or
 do we
  insist on using the period methods?
 
  Historic activities run the gamut from immersion reenactment to a town's
  history days event, with different expectations and requirements for
  different events. Sometimes someone will ask a discussion list if
 something
  is OK, when really that decision is up to the event organizers or the
  leadership of  a particular group.
 
  Where you draw the line is different than where I would draw it, and it
  could even be different for the garments in the same outfit.
 
  Absolute authenticity is a moving target, because the more we know, the
 more
  details there are that are harder t0 reach.
 
  That leads into the next question — where to substitute modern skills.
 When
  more labor-intensive methods are used, for example hand stitching, custom
  weaving, hand-knitting and the like, the potential for clients gets
 smaller.
  Some of these methods become a labor of love, a desire to learn a
 technique
  for its own sake.
 
  All costume, including the broader sense that all clothing is costume, is
 a
  deliberate effort to communicate something to the rest of the world.
  Appearance is important, the outermost layer. Some groups have the
 standard
  of hand stitching for visible seams, but machine sewn is ok for interior
  construction — for eras before the sewing machine was around.
 Underpinnings
  do make a difference in how the costume looks from the outside, but how
 much
  does it matter that the corset looks right, as long as it gives the right
  shaping. But once you have a reason to show the corset, its appearance
  becomes more important.
 
  Beyond that, as above, it starts to depend on personal interest in a
  particular technique or a desire to learn the techniques of a particular
  era.
 
  -Carol
  ___
  h-costume mailing list
  h-costume@mail.indra.com
  http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume
 

 ___
 h-costume mailing list
 h-costume@mail.indra.com
 http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume

___
h-costume mailing list
h-costume@mail.indra.com
http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume


Re: [h-cost] This Group and costume and ....

2011-03-14 Thread Michael Deibert
For those interested, here is the link to this list's info page which does a
good job of covering what this list is about.
http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume/

Here's just the first paragraph:

 This list concentrates on re-creating period costume, from the Bronze
 age to the mid-20th Century. Its emphasis is on accurate historical
 reproduction of clothing, historical techniques for garment construction,
 as well as the application of those techniques in modern clothing design.
 Other topics appropriate for discussion include adapting historical
 clothing for the modern figure, clothing evolution, theatrical costumes,
 patterns, materials, books, and sources for supplies.


Note that it includes clothing evolution. [please forgive the very brief
history] It used to be that every single garment was sewn by hand at home.
During the Middle Ages, guilds grew that focused on making clothing among
other things. Yet, much of the lower classes still made their own clothes.
Time progressed, governments changed... but we reached a point in the
Industrial age when the sewing machine was made. While many people still
sewed by hand, the machine changed the way things were done. This lead to
further developments and in short, we reached the point where we are today:
some sew by hand in authentic traditions, some sew using machines, some of
us sew historical garments, some sew our own clothes, some mass produce
garments.

Yes, there are other groups out there (and thank you for listing the links).
While I am aware of some of those and others, other people might not be.

The other discussion on here led me to realize that there is natural bias
among all of us who deal with fabric. But is it warranted bias? Or are we
just being stubborn and refuse to listen. In no means am I accusing anyone,
in fact I think we all are guilty of this in some form - myself included.
The same theory I had been discussing on the other forum I am on to get
feedback from that aspect. I had gotten some feedback from historical
costumers here. Laurie's post broke things down even simpler.

Fran, you mentioned that if you dont want to read some of the posts on here,
you simply ignore them. I completely agree! My time is limited as well. No
need to be forced to read anything.

Michael
___
h-costume mailing list
h-costume@mail.indra.com
http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume


Re: [h-cost] hoop storage

2011-03-14 Thread Michael Deibert
The two that I have hang rather nicely if you take a string and, after
collapsing the hoops, tie it around where the CF would be. Just simply tie
this around a strong hanger and it fits perfectly in most closet spaces.
___
h-costume mailing list
h-costume@mail.indra.com
http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume


Re: [h-cost] Authenticity

2011-03-14 Thread Michael Deibert
I agree. That level of maturity is what needs to be kept. It's all about
meta-cognition. You have to always consider where someone is coming from -
and usually it's not the same. Also, if we had no variety... things would
get rather boring and we'd stop sharing information because there'd be
nothing different to share.

Perhaps thankfuly, I have not been on a list-serve where things flamed on
for weeks. But if I was, I would either be actively involved in the debate
or I'd just ignore it and delete the emails.

I never tried to start another flame war or tried dictating what it should
be. I stated that I was going off-topic from the start.
Nor was I on this list during those flame wars - so was unaware that those
questions would start a huge fight instead of an educational discussion and
debate.

Michael
___
h-costume mailing list
h-costume@mail.indra.com
http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume


Re: [h-cost] History of Costume text?

2011-03-12 Thread Michael Deibert
 the classes.


Perhaps the program you went through was better prepared than others, I
cannot say. Perhaps things in general have changed since you've taken that
program either for the better or for worse ... it's hard to say because each
school's program can (and often does) vary drastically from others programs.

My dream program, as you call it, would focus on core basic courses
covering the common steps I mentioned above, paired with additional
specialized courses that are optional electives but not required. I'll use
the pattern-making reference to explain. The core class in pattern making
would cover the basics of flat pattern drafting, draping, correcting
patterns to improve fit, and perhaps even touch briefly in grading. A
student finishing that course would have a basic understand of the skills
needed in each area. The optional electives (say they'd be required to take
at least two electives in pattern making) would be focused on the specific
areas. Flat Pattern Drafting I  II, Draping I  II, Pattern Alterations,
Pattern Grading. While they would have to take at least two of the
electives, they could just focus on Flat Pattern Drafting, or just take the
two Draping courses. Apply the similar layout to each of the core steps, and
you have a Fashion Design  Production program that would be excellent for a
community college. Since most colleges offer minors in areas they offer full
degrees, the ideal minor program in this dream school would only require a
student take each of the core basic classes, perhaps with one or two
electives to add variety. This minor program then is perfect for the
home-sewer looking to take her skills to the next level, for the
custom-clothier to refine their skills, etc.

There are plenty of specialized schools, such as Parsons and FIT, that focus
entirely in the field. They have the ability to create whole programs just
on Fashion Design, or Pattern Making, etc.



 What I am getting at is:  People making historic costumes for themselves
 may not be familiar with grading ready-to-wear sizes, or with mass
 manufacturing, or with CAD programs.


Most of those who make historic costumes for themselves did not go to a
fashion design school (judging from what I have seen), but instead became
interested in it as a hobby and as their interest progressed, they learned
the skills they did not yet have. That's perfectly fine, but not exactly
what we're discussing here - we're talking about the courses a program
should have to cover what needs to be covered, yet allow options for
students to specialize in their specific segments of the garment field.
Kudos to anyone who takes a book, or takes a class and learns something new
from it, especially if they teach themselves - we never stop learning even
after going for an education.


Michael Deibert
___
h-costume mailing list
h-costume@mail.indra.com
http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume


Re: [h-cost] History of Costume text?

2011-03-12 Thread Michael Deibert
On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 1:51 PM, Lavolta Press f...@lavoltapress.comwrote:

 Can we get back to historical costuming now?


That's what I've been trying to do!

The point, however, is that everyone on this list already knows the basic
 steps of producing garments for their purposes. They do not need you to
 lecture them about it. You're not addressing a roomful of clueless newbies
 to whom you can dispense your wisdom about how the garment industry
 works--even though you're not working in it and just repeating what you
 heard on another forum.


Then please don't patronize me the same way you claim I am. And I am working
in the industry, not just repeating what I have been told. Yet I also am a
costume designer and am knowledgable in those skills. And I do custom,
period garments. Am I an expert? No, but I never claimed I am either.


 There are people on this list who hold different views on things like,
 whether a given garment is totally authentic for a given wearer in a given
 period--and whether it even matters if the person wearing the garment is not
 a historical interpreter. I personally think that holding a different view
 is not a misconception.


I think that's a wonderful topic for discussion. Perhaps a new thread? Here
are some questions that I've pondered.

- Where do we draw the line between what is acceptable as historically
accurate vs historically authentic?
- With modern sewing skills and fads (such as zippers), where do we
encorporate those skills to aid in construction of period garments, or do we
insist on using the period methods?

Michael.
___
h-costume mailing list
h-costume@mail.indra.com
http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume


Re: [h-cost] History of Costume text?

2011-03-11 Thread Michael Deibert
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 2:10 PM, Lavolta Press f...@lavoltapress.comwrote:

 * In every course I was in, the students wanted to make garments for
 themselves, regardless of their goals for the course. If they were going to
 put all that time and money into making something they loved, they wanted to
 wear it.


There is some sense in doing this in the RTW learning process. Most fashion
degree programs culminate in the creation of a line that is then shown as a
final project. I know of at least one recent graduate (she's active on the
forums I mentioned), who decided that since she was putting all this work
into creating her line, she wanted to do it correctly so that it could be
manufactured and earn back all the money she invested in the project to
graduate. So a program geared with this in mind would be extremely
beneficial but only if they themselves were the target market for their
line.



 * We were always taught custom fitting ... it's not how the ready-to-wear
 industry works. There's no way anyone could have been induced to buy an
 industry dress form for a standard size and make all the clothes for it
 (considering none of the students were exactly an industry standard size,
 which of course was the point of the fitting lessons).


This is a slight misconception and I'll avoid going into sizing issues. But
while there are industrial sized dress forms, the industry standard size is
a medium. The actual measurements of your line's medium is based on your
target market and your fit model. A fit model is the actual model you will
fit everything to - this is where the training on how to custom fit models
comes in handy.

Where the industry process differs from the home-sewing mindset is that
after the sample (muslin in home-sewing world) is fit to the fit model, the
pattern is then corrected to the new changes. The home-sewer takes the fit
sample and finishes it off because the alterations were done on the almost
finished garment.


Lastly, that is extremely unforunate regarding your male classmate but I
completely sympathize with him. As a male myself, most of the drafting books
and courses out there are geared towards women's clothing - not men.
Tailoring courses are for the male clothing yet unless you apprentice under
a tailor, very few courses come close to covering the basics of drafting
men's patterns.

Michael Deibert
OAS AAS LLS
___
h-costume mailing list
h-costume@mail.indra.com
http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume


Re: [h-cost] History of Costume text?

2011-03-11 Thread Michael Deibert
Quickly to wrap this up since we seem to agree to disagree... and if you'd
like to continue this because there are some interesting things brought up,
feel free to send me a private email.

First of all,

Remember, this is an e-list that focuses explicitly on making historic
 clothing.


I know exactly what this list is for, else I would not have signed up to
recieve the postings. I too, make made-to-measure, custom designed period
clothing. My degree is in theater with focus on costuming. The only thing
holding me back from knowing and doing the same things others on here do is
that I have not yet had the time to master all the skills.

Even though this is a historical costume list-serve, everything mentioned in
our discussion is completely relevent to original post of this thread.

Now, onto the rest of it and only because it should explain why I initially
went off topic as you proclaim. Here is the full context of the quote:

*On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 3:37 PM, Kathryn Pinner pinn...@mccc.edu wrote:
*

 *The powers that be at my community college (where I am a theatrical
 costume and set designer) have decided to start a Fashion Design and
 Merchandizing program (the push seems to be from the merchandizing/businesss
 side) and they are expecting me to teach the history of costume, basic
 sewing, and textiles.*


The point I made was that they are starting a Fashion Design and
Merchandizing *program*. Yes, Kate mentions that her courses are geared
towards history of costume, basic sewing, and textiles. Yet, since she is
one of the professors involved in the overall program, she can have input
into what the course are - even is she might not actually teach them.

[On a side note, history of costume would be of little help to a fashion
design major - unless it covers the history of modern fashion or period
fashion is become a mainstream revival without my knowledge.]

Yes, many people want to learn to sew their own clothes that fit them. That
is why all the community colleges around the area I live have continuing
education classes, which are separate from their degree courses. A course
such as the one you describe is better suited towards those courses, where
the more specialized courses would be for those pursing that degree program.

*The instructor actively helped to place students who wanted factory jobs
 into factories in the local garment industry (which used to be much more
 vital than it is today).  But, not everyone wants to sew on the factory
 floor, not to mention most of that work gets outsourced to third-world
 countries these days.
 *


True, the industry is not as vital today as it was even ten years ago. But
actually, the current trend is bringing manufacturing back into the US
because that is what the customers want - except there are no workers to do
the work. The manufacturing field in the US is full of open jobs for the
taking, yet most college graduates do not want to do actualy work but
instead become the next overnight sensation.


 *No matter what manufacturers do to sizing, they still will never custom
 fit the human body, unless they make clothes on a custom basis.
 *


Manufacturing clothing will never fit everyone perfectly - that's a fact
that has not nor will change. That is one of many reasons there is the
distinction between made-to-measure garments and those that are RTW
manufactured.


Michael Deibert
OAS AAS LLS
___
h-costume mailing list
h-costume@mail.indra.com
http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume


Re: [h-cost] History of Costume text?

2011-03-11 Thread Michael Deibert
First off let me apologize. It was a side comment that popped into my mind
that almost didn't make it through to the final edited post. Perhaps my mind
was preoccupied on the rest of the post that it made sense at the time?
Regardless, upon both replies and rethinking it myself I have to say even I
disagree with my own comment! [remember to think before typing next time!]

And Laurie, no fight needed. We all are entitled to our thoughts, and its
always best when they can be further supported such as both yours and
Carol's.

The history of costume/fashion [not to risk another side topic but I always
find it hard to distinquish between the two yet both words have different
connotations to most of society... hmmm...] is definitely something that is
needed. In all honesty, I wish I had more! I think my bias is that the only
course I had in studing for my degree was a combined Costume Design and
Costume History course - geared only towards theater. So not only was it
really half a course, but not once was the topic of how modern fashion draws
conclusions from historical periods. It wasn't until I really focused in on
theatrical costuming, that my interest in history in general grew - mostly
because now I felt in order to understand how the changes in costume
dictated/were dictated by changes in society.

And Carol, anytime actual research methods are employed is a huge benefit to
any degree. The world we live in seems to require proof before believing in
something. Research provides that. Knowing not only how to reseach but, more
importantly, how to apply that research to the use you need it to be is an
extremely useful skill. And I'd be perfectly fine with a revival of the
crinoline hoops or even the bustle!

And before I create more mess and drama, I completely agree Laurie that it
seems to have turned into the Fashion Design crowd versus the Historical
Costume crowd... and here I am debating for both sides at the middle of the
arguement! Extremely sorry, that was not my intent! But as you point out,
there are multiple ways we are all alike. Regardless of the time period,
both sides create a look based on research. Both sides use patterns of some
kind to transfer that design into the 3D reality. We all are constantly
sourcing for the right materials, be it for a certain look or certain price
point. At some point in the process we perfect the pattern to the intended
target wearer (be it one person or an entire age group). Almost always is
there something that needs to be undone and resewn, or replanned, etc.
Always. And after all that mess, both sides exit the process with a finished
garment that meets all the requirements they were aiming for.

It's only when we think we've learned everything we need to know, that we've
only just begun to learn the lesson.

Michael Deibert
___
h-costume mailing list
h-costume@mail.indra.com
http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume


Re: [h-cost] History of Costume text?

2011-03-11 Thread Michael Deibert
First, I don't think there exists a state that actually has money right now
- but that's a whole nothing topic! I am definitely not talking about
courses offered by fabric stores - unless one is an absolute complete
beginner and even then, the projects are way too simple.

Also, tuition is going up everywhere - unfortunately because it also means
that many future students might not get their education now because of the
increases.

As to the dream situation you refer to, its unfortunately not as easy as
that. Both sides (the aspiring amateur and the industry professionals) are
much more alike than either would like to agree. Except neither side is
willing to even talk to each other, let alone share the information that
would help bridge the chasm between the two. It really comes down to the
same basic steps that both sides follow, with slight changes in the order
and importance each side places on those steps. But most programs out their
focus solely on one or the other. Simple work on the cooperation, perhaps
even collaboration with certificate programs instead of full out degree
programs, would provide students with skills they need to get a job after
they graduate.  I hope that makes sense.
___
h-costume mailing list
h-costume@mail.indra.com
http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume


Re: [h-cost] History of Costume text?

2011-03-10 Thread Michael Deibert
Is this a new degree program? How many courses will be required for the new
degree and do you have any control over what they might, or could be?

In terms of those books, I personally don't know either. But unless it is a
course entirely on costume history, I would advise to give brief lectures of
each period. This is how the Costume History course I had was taught.
(Granted it was combined equally with costume design so the time was really
limited.) But my professor spent one of the two classes each week on a time
period, starting from the Egyptians and working forward in history. It was a
very brief into to each period but it covered the basic differences as the
era's changed - enough to cover costume history but if one wanted a
further knowledge, they then knew terms and resources to research. We did
not have a required book in the costume history portion, however on our
syllabus were listed a couple books that were recommended to purchase. Many
of these could even be bought second-hand for cheap.

On another note, if they are pushing for a fashion design degree with the
aims of being able to design and then produce a line, then I would highly
recommend Kathleen Fasanella's book *The Entrapreneur's Guide to Sewn
Product Manufacturing*. It is the only book of its kind, and it is aimed
soley at Design Entrepreneurs (DE's) in any sewn product field. Within its
pages, there is real-world, industry advice on everything from what not to
do, to how to go through every stage of the process. She wrote and published
it herself, so it can be quite frank at times but the points she makes are
worth it! She has a blog at http://www.fashion-incubator.com/. For the
purchase of a new book, anyone can then gain access to the members only
forum where everyone is somehow connected to the industry and there are many
DE's on there in the process of developing lines - I'm one of them!
Currently, most fashion design schools worry all about the designing element
and put little emphasis on actual manufacturing. If your community college
focus on the degree from this angle, not only will it be a unique program
out there but the students who earn that degree will be able to actually get
jobs. Most fashion school graduates are unprepared for the industry and the
industry is way oversaturated with amazing designers who can't manufacture
their designs because their education lacked those skills.

And if it helps, my degree is in theatrical costuming, not fashion. Most of
the DE's on Kathleen's site did not go to fashion schools either and those
who did only have a slight advantage over those who didn't but mostly in
skill such as patternmaking or such.

Hope this helps, and at the least check out Kathleen's blog. She also
replies to emails and has even talked to people over the phone before to
help them out.

Michael Deibert



On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 3:37 PM, Kathryn Pinner pinn...@mccc.edu wrote:

 The powers that be at my community college (where I am a theatrical costume
 and set designer) have decided to start a Fashion Design and Merchandizing
 program (the push seems to be from the merchandizing/businesss side) and
 they are expecting me to teach the history of costume, basic sewing, and
 textiles. They seem to be leaning toward using books from Pearson  and the
 the text for costume history they are looking at is 'History of World
 Costume and Fashion' by Daniel Delis Hill. Anyone know this text and have a
 comment? (I suggested 'Survey of Historic Costume' by Tortora  Eubanks --
 don't know if they will listen to me).  Other texts they are looking at are
 'The Sewing Book' by Alison Smith and 'Textiles' by Kadolph. Any comments?


 Kate Pinner

 ___
 h-costume mailing list
 h-costume@mail.indra.com
 http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume

___
h-costume mailing list
h-costume@mail.indra.com
http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume


Re: [h-cost] History of Costume text?

2011-03-10 Thread Michael Deibert
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 5:18 PM, Lavolta Press f...@lavoltapress.comwrote:


  On another note, if they are pushing for a fashion design degree with the
 aims of being able to design and then produce a line, then I would highly
 recommend Kathleen Fasanella's book *The Entrapreneur's Guide to Sewn
 Product Manufacturing*.

 On Amazon I searched on Fashion Design, and also found How to Set Up and
 Run a Fashion Label,Basics Fashion Design: Developing a Collection, 200
 Projects to Get You into Fashion Design, How to Open and Operate a
 Financially Successful Fashion Design Business, (this seems very similar
 the The Entrepreneur's Guide,) and a number of other books on setting up
 and running your own design business, as well as books I have not mentioned
 that focus entering the industry by working for other companies. Some of
 these books look excellent, for anyone interested in these topics.


While I cannot attest to the books you mentioned, Kathleen Fasanella's book
*The Entrepreneur's Guide to Sewn-Product Manufacturing* is NOT a book on
how to start a fashion design business, how to start a sewn manufacturing
business, etc. She takes one page and goes over a very short, brief run down
of things like that. It's actually quite humorous!  Her take on it is there
are way too many books out there on how to actually get a business started,
regardless of whether its in fashion or sewn products - and she is quite
right.

What her book does cover, are things that no other book has covered before.
Her book is actually known as the blue book in the industry know for those
who know of it. Some of the topics covered are: How to plan a line, style
numbers, What are blocks, Determining market entry, Producting Scheduling,
Sale's Reps, Market trends: what customers want, Producting costing, Setting
up shop, Improving product quality, Cutting a pattern for shrinkage, Why
DE's are destined to succeed, and many more.

She even has the full table of contents on here website, and some chapters
are free to preview. Here's the link:
http://www.fashion-incubator.com/products_services/table-of-contents/. I
recommend anyone interested in this to check it out - even if you are just
looking to achieve that professional, industry standard look (which btw is
not because of industrial secret techniques, but rather because the pattern
and the process are perfected that they can be quickly sewn in repetition
for large orders and still have the same qualifing markers in all finished
garments.)

And no, Kathleen is not paying me to advertise her book or anything like
that. I have learned more from her one book than I have any of the other
books I've read and looked into getting.
___
h-costume mailing list
h-costume@mail.indra.com
http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume


Re: [h-cost] Downton Abbey

2011-01-17 Thread Michael Deibert
I'd be surprised if the Big Three even gave it a thought. Plus, with my
experience in all of their historical patterns they shoot out, I spend
much more time having to deal with them than they are actually worth (mostly
the Big Three all have to add wearing ease - which is completely wrong for
something form fitting as a corset!). There are only a few smaller companies
that actually produce correct historical patterns.

Even if it would become the next costume drama, which I think wouldn't be
such a bad thing except maybe for the fabric companys, it would help hone in
on what really makes a historical costume because you can't just throw
something together and embellish the heck out of it when it's the size of
Barbie.

Mike

On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 4:14 PM, WorkroomButtons.com 
westvillagedrap...@yahoo.com wrote:

 By everyone,  do you mean major pattern companies?  Is PBS even on the
 radar of the Big Three?

 Dede

 --- On Mon, 1/17/11, Lavolta Press f...@lavoltapress.com wrote:
 So is this the next costume drama where everyone will be rushing to
 reproduce the costumes?

 Fran
 ___
 h-costume mailing list
 h-costume@mail.indra.com
 http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume

___
h-costume mailing list
h-costume@mail.indra.com
http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume


Re: [h-cost] Downton Abbey

2011-01-17 Thread Michael Deibert
Oop! I just realized that I had combined two different threads into one and
posted on here! (Was thinking more about the miniature sized costume
threads)

As for Downtown Abbey, I haven't seen it yet but it does look like a great
show and I definitely see where the idea of that influencing patterns.
However, because it's not a mainstream movie, or IMHO one of the major shows
currently airing, I dont think it will have much influence. For example, was
there a huge surge of patterns when The Tudors started airing? I don't
recall one yet that was a fairly major show.

Mike

On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 5:34 PM, annbw...@aol.com wrote:



 In a message dated 1/17/2011 4:33:03 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,
 exst...@gmail.com writes:

 It's a  BBC show,
 According to their website, it is indeed British, but ITV1, not  BBC.

 Ann Wass
 ___
 h-costume mailing list
 h-costume@mail.indra.com
 http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume

___
h-costume mailing list
h-costume@mail.indra.com
http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume