RE: [h-cost] Mona Lisa

2006-09-30 Thread otsisto
-Original Message- http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/85/Mona_Lisa.jpeg I'm only looking at the online picture, but I think that thing by her left shoulder might be a leaf or palm or something, that she is holding in her left hand. See how her fingers are positioned? and

Re: [h-cost] Mona Lisa

2006-09-29 Thread Sue Clemenger
at them, so I may be wrong. I thought it worth pursuing as an alternative explanation is all. ;o) --Sue - Original Message - From: Audrey Bergeron-Morin [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Historical Costume [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2006 11:03 PM Subject: Re: [h-cost] Mona Lisa

Re: [h-cost] Mona Lisa

2006-09-29 Thread Jean Waddie
otsisto [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote Note the Mona Lisa's left shoulder. There seems to be a shear something which I do not think is her veil. http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/85/Mona_Lisa.jpeg I'm only looking at the online picture, but I think that thing by her left shoulder might

RE: [h-cost] Mona Lisa

2006-09-28 Thread otsisto
Could they be thinking of something like this. http://tinyurl.com/e8esf But then, perhaps not. Note the Mona Lisa's left shoulder. There seems to be a shear something which I do not think is her veil. http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/85/Mona_Lisa.jpeg De w/ a 101 temp. so take

Re: [h-cost] Mona Lisa

2006-09-28 Thread Dawn
otsisto wrote: Could they be thinking of something like this. http://tinyurl.com/e8esf Oooh! Thanks for hunting that up. Yes, I think they could be. Does this lady look pregnant to you? She does to me. But then, perhaps not. Note the Mona Lisa's left shoulder. There seems to be a shear

Re: [h-cost] Mona Lisa

2006-09-28 Thread Sue Clemenger
Bergeron-Morin [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Historical Costume [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2006 4:23 PM Subject: Re: [h-cost] Mona Lisa If they're describing it as a gauzy, nearly transparent layer over her dress then I doubt it was worn for modesty. Didn't Queen Elizabeth wear

Re: [h-cost] Mona Lisa

2006-09-28 Thread Audrey Bergeron-Morin
Actually, it sounds like they're talking about a distinct style that I've seen in lots of ItalianRen paintings, although usually a little more obviously in view. They look (to my fading memory) like an early cross between a fichu and a partlet --Sue Oh, THOSE. But if it were that, it

[h-cost] Mona Lisa

2006-09-27 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IN the last day or so, there have been a number of reports on the intensive laser scan that a Canadian outfit is doing on DaVinci's Mona Lisa. In addition to a number of other new information, they are saying that they have detected a gauze veil on her head that they are claiming demonstrates

Re: [h-cost] Mona Lisa

2006-09-27 Thread Dawn
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: IN the last day or so, there have been a number of reports on the intensive laser scan that a Canadian outfit is doing on DaVinci's Mona Lisa. In addition to a number of other new information, they are saying that they have detected a gauze veil on her head that they are

Re: [h-cost] Mona Lisa

2006-09-27 Thread Glenda Robinson
Not my period either, but I find it amusing they've had to use intensive laser scanning to detect something I (and I suppose most others here) could see just by looking at a photograph in a book. I never realised 'no-one' had seen it. It's quite obvious around her hairline. Glenda.

Re: [h-cost] Mona Lisa

2006-09-27 Thread Dawn
Glenda Robinson wrote: Not my period either, but I find it amusing they've had to use intensive laser scanning to detect something I (and I suppose most others here) could see just by looking at a photograph in a book. I never realised 'no-one' had seen it. It's quite obvious around her

Re: [h-cost] Mona Lisa

2006-09-27 Thread Dawn
Sharon at Collierfam.com wrote: Don't know of this, but if true, could be for privacy/modesty during nursing. Just a thought. If they're describing it as a gauzy, nearly transparent layer over her dress then I doubt it was worn for modesty. Dawn

Re: [h-cost] Mona Lisa

2006-09-27 Thread Penny
I think the main problem is that we are so used to seeing paintings that have been air-brushed in media. There are plenty of painting, textiles, costumes, that have been in private and institutional collections that have lost so much in detail lost to grime or aging process. I recall being so

Re: [h-cost] Mona Lisa

2006-09-27 Thread david webb
] To: Historical Costume [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 27, 2006 9:18 PM Subject: Re: [h-cost] Mona Lisa Sharon at Collierfam.com wrote: Don't know of this, but if true, could be for privacy/modesty during nursing. Just a thought. If they're describing it as a gauzy, nearly

Re: [h-cost] Mona Lisa

2006-09-27 Thread Penny
Sheridan, It is wonderful the Canadians have this technology. Big kudos! It makes me wonderful what is under the vanish, dirt, and such so many other paintings. Penny Ladnier, Owner, The Costume Gallery Websites www.costumegallery.com www.costumelibrary.com www.costumeclassroom.com

Re: [h-cost] Mona Lisa

2006-09-27 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- david webb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: As a proud Canadian, standing on guard for thee, trusty ally to Britain and the U.S. in peace and war, etc. etc. yadda, yadda, I winced a bit at the reference to the Canadian outfit (which makes it sound as if the local cowboys, hunting lodge or wedding