Re: [h-cost] Not tying your bonnet strings ?

2011-11-19 Thread Linda Walton
Thank you, Elizabeth W. and Sharon C. - I never realised that wearing a hat could have so many implications! I wonder if the idea is modern of doing honour to the occasion by wearing a hat, which seems to be coming back into custom and not just fashion. When I wore a hat as part of my school

Re: [h-cost] Not tying your bonnet strings ?

2011-11-19 Thread Sharon Collier
Re: gloves: a kickback to the Victorian thing of never being tanned; it meant you worked! Same reasoning behind always wearing a hat. A LADY did not get tanned from working in the sun. Some women took arsenic in tiny doses to give them that really pale look. The ideal was to be really pale with

Re: [h-cost] Not tying your bonnet strings ?

2011-11-19 Thread Sharon Collier
Actually, at Fezziwigs, one removes one's bonnet because it is difficult to see while one is dancing. While on a short visit to the Adventurer's Club or Tavistock House, one leaves one's bonnet on; if one is staying to have tea or dine, one removes it. Sharon -Original Message- From:

Re: [h-cost] Not tying your bonnet strings ?

2011-11-19 Thread albertcat
Most 19th century bonnets I've seen, real and costume, will stay on as well as any hat and the strings don't really keep it on, except maybe in windy weather or in an open coach. I'm willing to bet that many times the tying of one's bonnet string, and how they are to be tied is dictated by

Re: [h-cost] Not tying your bonnet strings ?

2011-11-19 Thread Lavolta Press
On 11/19/2011 1:57 PM, albert...@aol.com wrote: Most 19th century bonnets I've seen, real and costume, will stay on as well as any hat and the strings don't really keep it on, except maybe in windy weather or in an open coach. snip There are various 19th-century paintings of women